Best Practices for Storage of Reusable Medical Devices in the Military Health System.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Military Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1093/milmed/usaf023
Matthew G Blake, Marissa Gracia, James Uregen, Elena Brown, Kenneth Romito, Christopher Stucky, Christy Mitchell, Bethany Atwood
{"title":"Best Practices for Storage of Reusable Medical Devices in the Military Health System.","authors":"Matthew G Blake, Marissa Gracia, James Uregen, Elena Brown, Kenneth Romito, Christopher Stucky, Christy Mitchell, Bethany Atwood","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The storage of reusable medical devices (RMDs) is the final reprocessing phase and the step that directly precedes point-of-care delivery. Reusable medical devices, including surgical tools necessitating sterilization and semicritical devices such as endoscopes, undergo high-level disinfection. The rigorous reprocessing protocols and subsequent storage of RMDs are crucial in preserving their sterility and asepsis. This ensures they are available, clean, and safe for patient use, thereby significantly reducing the risk of surgical site infection. The stringent requirements for RMD storage are a testament to the critical role it plays in patient safety, making it a demanding task for health care organizations (HCOs) to comply with. These challenges are further amplified in austere environments. This integrative review aims to identify optimal storage practices, emphasize the critical importance of RMD storage in the Military Health System, and derive implications for policies and future considerations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The authors performed an integrative review and comprehensive literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase using the keywords \"instrument storage,\" \"surgical instruments,\" \"sterile storage,\" \"sterile wrap,\" and \"flexible endoscope storage.\" Articles were limited to English from 1980 to 2024. Additionally, the authors reviewed international guidelines to support RMD storage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The integrative review of 42 articles and 14 guidelines and articles identified 6 central themes supporting RMD storage, which include facility design, environmental considerations, sterile storage packaging systems, considerations for event-related sterile storage, point-of-care delivery, and endoscope storage best practices. The abundance of evidence-based recommendations and guidelines complicates adherence to optimal practices in HCOs, presenting significant challenges in austere environments. Integrating RMD storage considerations into training, exercises, and operations help promote a culture of RMD stewardship to ensure safe surgical and procedural care within the Military Health System.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although surgical teams' capabilities are crucial in delivering effective care in a dynamic environment, the management and storage of RMDs are equally essential. Numerous organizations have outlined rigorous guidelines for HCOs to comply with, which can be intensified in austere conditions. Ultimately, a commitment to integrating the literature and developing the groundwork for clinical practice guidelines can improve the safe storage of RMDs in both standard and austere environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The storage of reusable medical devices (RMDs) is the final reprocessing phase and the step that directly precedes point-of-care delivery. Reusable medical devices, including surgical tools necessitating sterilization and semicritical devices such as endoscopes, undergo high-level disinfection. The rigorous reprocessing protocols and subsequent storage of RMDs are crucial in preserving their sterility and asepsis. This ensures they are available, clean, and safe for patient use, thereby significantly reducing the risk of surgical site infection. The stringent requirements for RMD storage are a testament to the critical role it plays in patient safety, making it a demanding task for health care organizations (HCOs) to comply with. These challenges are further amplified in austere environments. This integrative review aims to identify optimal storage practices, emphasize the critical importance of RMD storage in the Military Health System, and derive implications for policies and future considerations.

Materials and methods: The authors performed an integrative review and comprehensive literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase using the keywords "instrument storage," "surgical instruments," "sterile storage," "sterile wrap," and "flexible endoscope storage." Articles were limited to English from 1980 to 2024. Additionally, the authors reviewed international guidelines to support RMD storage.

Results: The integrative review of 42 articles and 14 guidelines and articles identified 6 central themes supporting RMD storage, which include facility design, environmental considerations, sterile storage packaging systems, considerations for event-related sterile storage, point-of-care delivery, and endoscope storage best practices. The abundance of evidence-based recommendations and guidelines complicates adherence to optimal practices in HCOs, presenting significant challenges in austere environments. Integrating RMD storage considerations into training, exercises, and operations help promote a culture of RMD stewardship to ensure safe surgical and procedural care within the Military Health System.

Conclusion: Although surgical teams' capabilities are crucial in delivering effective care in a dynamic environment, the management and storage of RMDs are equally essential. Numerous organizations have outlined rigorous guidelines for HCOs to comply with, which can be intensified in austere conditions. Ultimately, a commitment to integrating the literature and developing the groundwork for clinical practice guidelines can improve the safe storage of RMDs in both standard and austere environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军事卫生系统中储存可重复使用医疗器械的最佳做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
期刊最新文献
Comparing Veteran and Nonveteran Epigenetic Aging in a Representative Sample of United States Adults. Primary Care Visit Rates Among Canadian Veterans in Ontario: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Sex- and Length of Service-stratified Comparisons With Nonveterans. Parental Mental Health Conditions and Infant Health Outcomes Among Military Families. Letter from the Chief Executive Officer Dr. John Cho. Heat Strokes in Active-Duty Military.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1