Real-world single-center preliminary experience of radiofrequency balloon pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Andrea Dell'Aquila, Carmelo La Greca, Amedeo Prezioso, Simone Zanchi, Joseph Antoine Kheir, Domenico Pecora
{"title":"Real-world single-center preliminary experience of radiofrequency balloon pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation.","authors":"Andrea Dell'Aquila, Carmelo La Greca, Amedeo Prezioso, Simone Zanchi, Joseph Antoine Kheir, Domenico Pecora","doi":"10.1016/j.ipej.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by percutaneous transcatheter ablation is its pivotal treatment. Nowadays, several techniques using different energy sources are used, such as radiofrequency (RF), cryoablation and laser ablation. A new technology that combines the strengths of different techniques has been developed, in particular having both the speed of one-shot techniques and the selectivity and precision of point-by-point RF: the RF balloon (RFB). Recent clinical studies<sup>1-3</sup> have demonstrated its efficacy and safety, with good results in terms of first pass isolation, procedural duration and fluoroscopy time. However, real-world data regarding RFB ablation is scarce, therefore with this study we aimed to describe the experience of our center with this technology (one of the first adopting it in our country). We prospectively enrolled in a single-center a total of 20 consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation with RFB. The primary endpoint, i.e. PVI defined as stable absence of any electrical conduction from and into the veins, was met by 18 patient (90%). Mean procedural and fluoroscopy times were 79±30.68 min and and 15.36±6.57 min, respectively, dwelling time was 30.3±8.09 min. The only complication reported was a single case mild pericardial effusion 24 h after the procedure, likely of inflammatory nature, which was treated conservatively and resolved before discharge. With this study we demonstrated that PVI with RFB appears to be an effective and safe technique in a real world setting, with many upsides and a reduced atrial dwelling time that theoretically could reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications. Further studies on larger number of patients are needed to confirm the results we obtained.</p>","PeriodicalId":35900,"journal":{"name":"Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2025.01.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by percutaneous transcatheter ablation is its pivotal treatment. Nowadays, several techniques using different energy sources are used, such as radiofrequency (RF), cryoablation and laser ablation. A new technology that combines the strengths of different techniques has been developed, in particular having both the speed of one-shot techniques and the selectivity and precision of point-by-point RF: the RF balloon (RFB). Recent clinical studies1-3 have demonstrated its efficacy and safety, with good results in terms of first pass isolation, procedural duration and fluoroscopy time. However, real-world data regarding RFB ablation is scarce, therefore with this study we aimed to describe the experience of our center with this technology (one of the first adopting it in our country). We prospectively enrolled in a single-center a total of 20 consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation with RFB. The primary endpoint, i.e. PVI defined as stable absence of any electrical conduction from and into the veins, was met by 18 patient (90%). Mean procedural and fluoroscopy times were 79±30.68 min and and 15.36±6.57 min, respectively, dwelling time was 30.3±8.09 min. The only complication reported was a single case mild pericardial effusion 24 h after the procedure, likely of inflammatory nature, which was treated conservatively and resolved before discharge. With this study we demonstrated that PVI with RFB appears to be an effective and safe technique in a real world setting, with many upsides and a reduced atrial dwelling time that theoretically could reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications. Further studies on larger number of patients are needed to confirm the results we obtained.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal is a peer reviewed online journal devoted to cardiac pacing and electrophysiology. Editorial Advisory Board includes eminent personalities in the field of cardiac pacing and electrophysiology from Asia, Australia, Europe and North America.
期刊最新文献
Real-world single-center preliminary experience of radiofrequency balloon pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation. Targeting Deep Substrates With Radiofrequency: Unipolar With Half-Normal Saline Irrigation vs. Bipolar With Normal Saline Irrigation. Conduction disease in cardiac amyloidosis patients: A case series suggesting a role for left bundle branch area pacing. The importance of inflammation in atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with Cryo balloon ablation. Leadless pacemaker implantation in challenging scenarios: A case report series of patients with mechanical tricuspid valves.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1