Considerations for Perioperative Management Guidance Regarding GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Evaluation of Current Practices and Future Directions.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Military Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1093/milmed/usaf029
Kayla M Knuf, Krista B Highland, Kathryn C Houhoulis, Angela D McElrath
{"title":"Considerations for Perioperative Management Guidance Regarding GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Evaluation of Current Practices and Future Directions.","authors":"Kayla M Knuf, Krista B Highland, Kathryn C Houhoulis, Angela D McElrath","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have become increasingly prevalent and have the potential to delay gastric emptying. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) released guidance regarding the perioperative management of patients receiving GLP-1 RAs, but it is unclear the extent to which hospitals in the U.S. Military Health System have implemented policies consistent with this guidance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was sent to active duty anesthesiologists and Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) working in the U.S. Military Health System. The questions assessed the presence of institutional GLP-1 RA perioperative policies, adherence to the policy (if applicable), the basis and components of current and recommended future institutional policies, institutional tracking of policy implementation and outcomes, and knowledge, skills, barriers, and continuing medical education goals related to the perioperative management of patients receiving GLP-1 RAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 32% (N = 265); a little over half of the respondents were anesthesiologists (53%); and respondents' primary practices included over 50 institutions. More than half (54%) indicated that their primary practice location had a GLP-1 RA perioperative policy; 65% of whom indicated that they always followed the policy. In review of practice locations with >1 respondents, there was a lack of perfect agreement across most locations. The most commonly reported basis for the policy was ASA guidance (87%), followed by department leadership (37%). Barriers to any system-wide GLP-1 perioperative management policy included a lack of gastric ultrasound practice and comfort, as well as reported skills and knowledge, pressure not to cancel cases, scheduling problems, and productivity requirements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Formal policies were reported by most respondents, but inconsistencies within practice locations suggest that local policy implementation could be improved. Commonly reported barriers to future system-wide policy implementation provide data-driven information for system-wide efforts to improve policy success.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e1022-e1028"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have become increasingly prevalent and have the potential to delay gastric emptying. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) released guidance regarding the perioperative management of patients receiving GLP-1 RAs, but it is unclear the extent to which hospitals in the U.S. Military Health System have implemented policies consistent with this guidance.

Methods: A questionnaire was sent to active duty anesthesiologists and Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) working in the U.S. Military Health System. The questions assessed the presence of institutional GLP-1 RA perioperative policies, adherence to the policy (if applicable), the basis and components of current and recommended future institutional policies, institutional tracking of policy implementation and outcomes, and knowledge, skills, barriers, and continuing medical education goals related to the perioperative management of patients receiving GLP-1 RAs.

Results: The response rate was 32% (N = 265); a little over half of the respondents were anesthesiologists (53%); and respondents' primary practices included over 50 institutions. More than half (54%) indicated that their primary practice location had a GLP-1 RA perioperative policy; 65% of whom indicated that they always followed the policy. In review of practice locations with >1 respondents, there was a lack of perfect agreement across most locations. The most commonly reported basis for the policy was ASA guidance (87%), followed by department leadership (37%). Barriers to any system-wide GLP-1 perioperative management policy included a lack of gastric ultrasound practice and comfort, as well as reported skills and knowledge, pressure not to cancel cases, scheduling problems, and productivity requirements.

Conclusions: Formal policies were reported by most respondents, but inconsistencies within practice locations suggest that local policy implementation could be improved. Commonly reported barriers to future system-wide policy implementation provide data-driven information for system-wide efforts to improve policy success.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于 GLP-1 受体激动剂围手术期管理指南的考虑因素:评估当前做法和未来方向。
胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)已变得越来越普遍,并具有延迟胃排空的潜力。美国麻醉师协会(ASA)发布了关于接受GLP-1 RAs的患者围手术期管理的指南,但目前尚不清楚美国军事卫生系统中哪些医院实施了与该指南一致的政策。方法:向在美国军事卫生系统工作的现役麻醉师和注册麻醉师护士(crna)发送问卷。这些问题评估了机构GLP-1 RA围手术期政策的存在,政策的依从性(如果适用),当前和建议的未来机构政策的基础和组成部分,政策实施和结果的机构跟踪,以及与接受GLP-1 RA患者围手术期管理相关的知识、技能、障碍和继续医学教育目标。结果:有效率为32% (N = 265);超过一半的受访者是麻醉师(53%);受访者的主要做法包括50多家机构。超过一半(54%)的人表示他们的主要诊所有GLP-1 RA围手术期政策;65%的人表示他们一直遵守这项政策。在审查实践地点与bb101受访者,有缺乏完美的协议在大多数地点。最常见的政策依据是ASA指导(87%),其次是部门领导(37%)。任何全系统GLP-1围手术期管理政策的障碍包括缺乏胃超声实践和舒适度,以及报告的技能和知识,不取消病例的压力,调度问题和生产力要求。结论:大多数受访者报告了正式的政策,但实践地点之间的不一致性表明,地方政策的实施可以得到改善。通常报告的未来全系统政策实施的障碍为全系统努力提高政策的成功提供了数据驱动的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
期刊最新文献
Establishing Normative Sonographic Muscle Ratios for the Rotator Cuff in a Military Beneficiary Population. Retained Unexploded Ordnance: A Safety Analysis of Diagnostic Ultrasound on Piezoelectric Fuzes. Microlearning as an Adjunct to a 4-Hour Hands-On POCUS Curriculum for Paramedics: A Pilot Study. Changes in Physical Fitness and Program Utilization During Professional Military Education. Digital Mental Health Care for Veterans: An Overview of the Veterans Affairs (VA) Apps, Their Evidence Base, and Adoption Trends.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1