Experentia Et Progressus: An Experiential Needs Assessment of Military Health care Providers in Treating Pediatric Combat Trauma.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Military Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1093/milmed/usaf020
Matthew A Tovar, Sebastian W Lara, Sherri L Rudinsky, Sara E Bibbens
{"title":"Experentia Et Progressus: An Experiential Needs Assessment of Military Health care Providers in Treating Pediatric Combat Trauma.","authors":"Matthew A Tovar, Sebastian W Lara, Sherri L Rudinsky, Sara E Bibbens","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Children are among the most vulnerable populations affected by armed conflicts, yet there is limited data on the preparedness of military medical personnel to care for pediatric combat trauma casualties in austere or large-scale combat operations. This study aimed to assess the confidence, training needs, and resource requirements of military medical providers who have managed pediatric patients during deployment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This IRB-exempt, cross-sectional mixed-methods study used a survey created via a modified Delphi method with input from subject matter experts. The survey was distributed to active duty and reservist physicians, nurses, medics, and corpsmen who had previously deployed to combat environments. Respondents answered Likert-style questions anonymously on the SurveyMonkey platform. Data were analyzed using Welch's t-test, with statistical significance defined as P < .05. Qualitative data were coded into discrete themes and summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 84 respondents participated in the survey. Only 27% reported feeling confident or very confident in resuscitating pediatric casualties. Health care providers with prior exposure to pediatric patients reported significantly higher confidence in pediatric trauma resuscitation (P = .02). Key factors contributing to low confidence included difficulty with pediatric medication dosing, anatomical and physiological differences, lack of experience, and insufficient pediatric-specific equipment during deployment. Nearly all respondents with prior pediatric combat trauma experience expressed a desire for additional pediatric-specific predeployment training, with nearly half (47%) advocating for more robust military-civilian trauma center partnerships. Furthermore, 59% of respondents felt they lacked adequate emotional support following negative pediatric events and recommended stronger post-traumatic event debriefing and support mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many recently deployed military medical providers reported low confidence in resuscitating pediatric patients in the combat environment, because of drug dosing, anatomic and physiologic differences, and inexperience. Regardless of specialty, almost all providers requested additional pediatric training to improve baseline preparedness. These results can guide future predeployment training and inform policy to reduce unnecessary pediatric mortality on the battlefield.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Children are among the most vulnerable populations affected by armed conflicts, yet there is limited data on the preparedness of military medical personnel to care for pediatric combat trauma casualties in austere or large-scale combat operations. This study aimed to assess the confidence, training needs, and resource requirements of military medical providers who have managed pediatric patients during deployment.

Materials and methods: This IRB-exempt, cross-sectional mixed-methods study used a survey created via a modified Delphi method with input from subject matter experts. The survey was distributed to active duty and reservist physicians, nurses, medics, and corpsmen who had previously deployed to combat environments. Respondents answered Likert-style questions anonymously on the SurveyMonkey platform. Data were analyzed using Welch's t-test, with statistical significance defined as P < .05. Qualitative data were coded into discrete themes and summarized.

Results: A total of 84 respondents participated in the survey. Only 27% reported feeling confident or very confident in resuscitating pediatric casualties. Health care providers with prior exposure to pediatric patients reported significantly higher confidence in pediatric trauma resuscitation (P = .02). Key factors contributing to low confidence included difficulty with pediatric medication dosing, anatomical and physiological differences, lack of experience, and insufficient pediatric-specific equipment during deployment. Nearly all respondents with prior pediatric combat trauma experience expressed a desire for additional pediatric-specific predeployment training, with nearly half (47%) advocating for more robust military-civilian trauma center partnerships. Furthermore, 59% of respondents felt they lacked adequate emotional support following negative pediatric events and recommended stronger post-traumatic event debriefing and support mechanisms.

Conclusions: Many recently deployed military medical providers reported low confidence in resuscitating pediatric patients in the combat environment, because of drug dosing, anatomic and physiologic differences, and inexperience. Regardless of specialty, almost all providers requested additional pediatric training to improve baseline preparedness. These results can guide future predeployment training and inform policy to reduce unnecessary pediatric mortality on the battlefield.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
期刊最新文献
Preliminary Effectiveness of a Companion Dog Whole Health Intervention for Improving Balance and Gait Quality in Veterans. A Preliminary Analysis of Psychological Strengths: Service Members' Well-being Post-deployment. Effects of Endotracheal Weight-Based Epinephrine on Pharmacokinetics and Survival in Swine With a Cardiac Arrest. Genito-Urinary Trauma in the War Context: A Review of Two Decades of Experience From the French Armed Forces. Holistic Tri-Service Military Pathology: A Proposed Paradigm for Consolidation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1