Exploring Barriers and Bridging Gaps: Perspectives of Nurses, Midwives, and Lady Health Workers in the Implementation of Emergency Obstetric Care.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12669/pjms.41.1.10269
Fouzia Gul, Razia Mehsood, Shehla Noor
{"title":"Exploring Barriers and Bridging Gaps: Perspectives of Nurses, Midwives, and Lady Health Workers in the Implementation of Emergency Obstetric Care.","authors":"Fouzia Gul, Razia Mehsood, Shehla Noor","doi":"10.12669/pjms.41.1.10269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & objectives: </strong>Maternal mortality is a global concern primarily due to preventable obstetric complications. Challenges in implementing Emergency Obstetric Care (EmOC) in developing nations hinder effective reduction of these deaths. Our objective was to identify key challenges in EmOC practices among frontline healthcare providers, assess the severity and frequency of these barriers, and evaluate gaps in resources, training, and institutional support needed for effective resolution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study assessed EmOC knowledge, practical skills, and challenges among Nurses, Lady Health Visitors (LHVs), and Lady Health Workers (LHWs) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan from July 2017-June 2020. Participants were conveniently sampled from hospitals across eight districts, with data collected through a questionnaire on EmOC knowledge, practical interventions, and challenges faced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although most participants (91% of nurses, 90.2% of LHVs, 92.3% of LHWs, and 83.3% of midwives) expressed satisfaction with course content, important gaps emerged in the practical application of specific EmOC interventions. Nurses displayed 79% knowledge of the Partogram with only 60% utilization, while LHVs showed 80.5% knowledge but just 50.2% utilization. Assisted delivery knowledge and practice were particularly low among nurses (32% & 7%) & LHVs (17.1% & 2.4%) respectively. Significant gaps were found in retained placenta removal and manual vacuum aspiration, with only 12% of nurses and 3% of LHVs practicing the latter, with no utilization among LHWs or midwives. Key barriers included insufficient training and restrictive institutional policies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite high course content satisfaction, disparities in EmOC knowledge and practice persist among frontline healthcare-providers, with barriers like insufficient training and institutional limitations impacting maternal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19958,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"41 1","pages":"3-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.41.1.10269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives: Maternal mortality is a global concern primarily due to preventable obstetric complications. Challenges in implementing Emergency Obstetric Care (EmOC) in developing nations hinder effective reduction of these deaths. Our objective was to identify key challenges in EmOC practices among frontline healthcare providers, assess the severity and frequency of these barriers, and evaluate gaps in resources, training, and institutional support needed for effective resolution.

Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed EmOC knowledge, practical skills, and challenges among Nurses, Lady Health Visitors (LHVs), and Lady Health Workers (LHWs) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan from July 2017-June 2020. Participants were conveniently sampled from hospitals across eight districts, with data collected through a questionnaire on EmOC knowledge, practical interventions, and challenges faced.

Results: Although most participants (91% of nurses, 90.2% of LHVs, 92.3% of LHWs, and 83.3% of midwives) expressed satisfaction with course content, important gaps emerged in the practical application of specific EmOC interventions. Nurses displayed 79% knowledge of the Partogram with only 60% utilization, while LHVs showed 80.5% knowledge but just 50.2% utilization. Assisted delivery knowledge and practice were particularly low among nurses (32% & 7%) & LHVs (17.1% & 2.4%) respectively. Significant gaps were found in retained placenta removal and manual vacuum aspiration, with only 12% of nurses and 3% of LHVs practicing the latter, with no utilization among LHWs or midwives. Key barriers included insufficient training and restrictive institutional policies.

Conclusion: Despite high course content satisfaction, disparities in EmOC knowledge and practice persist among frontline healthcare-providers, with barriers like insufficient training and institutional limitations impacting maternal outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索障碍,缩小差距:护士、助产士和女卫生工作者在实施产科急诊中的观点。
背景与目的:孕产妇死亡率是一个全球关注的问题,主要原因是可预防的产科并发症。在发展中国家实施紧急产科护理方面的挑战阻碍了有效减少这些死亡。我们的目标是确定一线医疗保健提供者在EmOC实践中的主要挑战,评估这些障碍的严重性和频率,并评估有效解决所需的资源、培训和机构支持方面的差距。方法:本横断面研究评估了2017年7月至2020年6月巴基斯坦开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省护士、女性卫生访问者(LHVs)和女性卫生工作者(LHWs)的EmOC知识、实践技能和挑战。参与者方便地从8个地区的医院抽样,通过关于急诊医疗知识、实际干预措施和面临的挑战的问卷收集数据。结果:尽管大多数参与者(91%的护士、90.2%的LHVs、92.3%的LHWs和83.3%的助产士)对课程内容表示满意,但在具体EmOC干预措施的实际应用中出现了重大差距。护士对该方案的了解程度为79%,但使用率仅为60%;护士对该方案的了解程度为80.5%,但使用率仅为50.2%。护士(32%和7%)和lhv(17.1%和2.4%)的辅助分娩知识和实践水平尤其低。在保留胎盘移除和手动真空抽吸方面存在显著差距,只有12%的护士和3%的LHVs采用后者,LHWs和助产士中没有使用。主要障碍包括培训不足和限制性体制政策。结论:尽管课程内容满意度很高,但一线医护人员在产科产科知识和实践方面的差距仍然存在,培训不足和制度限制等障碍影响了孕产妇结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: It is a peer reviewed medical journal published regularly since 1984. It was previously known as quarterly "SPECIALIST" till December 31st 1999. It publishes original research articles, review articles, current practices, short communications & case reports. It attracts manuscripts not only from within Pakistan but also from over fifty countries from abroad. Copies of PJMS are sent to all the import medical libraries all over Pakistan and overseas particularly in South East Asia and Asia Pacific besides WHO EMRO Region countries. Eminent members of the medical profession at home and abroad regularly contribute their write-ups, manuscripts in our publications. We pursue an independent editorial policy, which allows an opportunity to the healthcare professionals to express their views without any fear or favour. That is why many opinion makers among the medical and pharmaceutical profession use this publication to communicate their viewpoint.
期刊最新文献
Frequency of Acute Stress Disorder (ASD) and Postnatal Depression in Mothers Of Preterm Neonates Hospitalized in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in Pakistan. Effects of infant touch on the growth and neurodevelopment of preterm infants. Expression of lipid metabolism-related genes in hepatocellular carcinoma and their prognostic significance. Feedback literacy among undergraduate dental students: A cross-sectional study across two institutions. Efficacy and safety of sintilimab in the treatment of sqNSCLC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1