Efficacy and Safety of Aprocitentan in the Treatment of Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Evidence from Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.31083/RCM25909
Li Zheng, Ming Liu, Xiaotong Gu, Yatong Zhang, Yan Wang
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Aprocitentan in the Treatment of Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Evidence from Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Li Zheng, Ming Liu, Xiaotong Gu, Yatong Zhang, Yan Wang","doi":"10.31083/RCM25909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension is one of the most prevalent disorders encountered in medical practice, yet effective pharmacotherapy options for resistant hypertension are limited. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aprocitentan in treating hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception to June 3, 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy and safety between aprocitentan and placebo in treating hypertension. According to the dosage of aprocitentan, the study was divided into a low-dose group (10-12.5 mg), medium-dose group (25 mg), and high-dose group (50 mg).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included five RCTs, which incorporated 1224 patients, and displayed that aprocitentan can reduce the mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) [(low dose subgroup: mean difference (MD): -3.85 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI): -7.47 to -0.23; <i>p</i> = 0.040; medium dose group: MD: -5.56 mmHg; 95% CI: -10.69 to -0.44; <i>p</i> = 0.030)], mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) (low dose subgroup: MD: -3.95 mmHg; 95% CI: -4.06 to -3.85; <i>p</i> < 0.001; medium dose group: MD: -4.75 mmHg; 95% CI: -5.91 to -3.60; <i>p</i> < 0.001), 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure (maSBP) (low dose group: MD: -4.18 mmHg; 95% CI: -4.32 to -4.04; <i>p</i> < 0.001; medium dose group: MD: -5.89 mmHg; 95% CI: -6.03 to -5.75; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (maDBP) (low dose group: MD: -4.33 mmHg; 95% CI: -4.42 to -4.24; <i>p</i> < 0.001; medium dose group: MD: -5.82 mmHg; 95% CI: -5.91 to -5.73; <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the high-dose group, there was no difference between the aprocitentan and placebo groups in the msSBP (MD: -4.83 mmHg; 95% CI: -11.44 to 1.79; <i>p</i> = 0.150). Meanwhile, the safety profile of aprocitentan was good, and no significant differences in the frequency of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed compared to the placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aprocitentan significantly reduces blood pressure and has a good safety profile. However, it is worth noting that high doses of aprocitentan (50 mg) did not yield better blood pressure-lowering effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":"25909"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM25909","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is one of the most prevalent disorders encountered in medical practice, yet effective pharmacotherapy options for resistant hypertension are limited. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aprocitentan in treating hypertension.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception to June 3, 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy and safety between aprocitentan and placebo in treating hypertension. According to the dosage of aprocitentan, the study was divided into a low-dose group (10-12.5 mg), medium-dose group (25 mg), and high-dose group (50 mg).

Results: This meta-analysis included five RCTs, which incorporated 1224 patients, and displayed that aprocitentan can reduce the mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) [(low dose subgroup: mean difference (MD): -3.85 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI): -7.47 to -0.23; p = 0.040; medium dose group: MD: -5.56 mmHg; 95% CI: -10.69 to -0.44; p = 0.030)], mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) (low dose subgroup: MD: -3.95 mmHg; 95% CI: -4.06 to -3.85; p < 0.001; medium dose group: MD: -4.75 mmHg; 95% CI: -5.91 to -3.60; p < 0.001), 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure (maSBP) (low dose group: MD: -4.18 mmHg; 95% CI: -4.32 to -4.04; p < 0.001; medium dose group: MD: -5.89 mmHg; 95% CI: -6.03 to -5.75; p < 0.001), and 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (maDBP) (low dose group: MD: -4.33 mmHg; 95% CI: -4.42 to -4.24; p < 0.001; medium dose group: MD: -5.82 mmHg; 95% CI: -5.91 to -5.73; p < 0.001). In the high-dose group, there was no difference between the aprocitentan and placebo groups in the msSBP (MD: -4.83 mmHg; 95% CI: -11.44 to 1.79; p = 0.150). Meanwhile, the safety profile of aprocitentan was good, and no significant differences in the frequency of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed compared to the placebo.

Conclusions: Aprocitentan significantly reduces blood pressure and has a good safety profile. However, it is worth noting that high doses of aprocitentan (50 mg) did not yield better blood pressure-lowering effects.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿普昔坦治疗高血压的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验证据的荟萃分析。
背景:高血压是医学实践中最常见的疾病之一,但对顽固性高血压的有效药物治疗选择有限。在这项荟萃分析中,我们旨在评估阿普昔坦治疗高血压的有效性和安全性。方法:我们检索了PubMed、Embase、ClinicalTrials.gov和Cochrane Library数据库,检索了从成立到2024年6月3日的随机对照试验(rct),比较了阿普昔坦和安慰剂治疗高血压的有效性和安全性。根据阿普西坦的剂量分为低剂量组(10-12.5 mg)、中剂量组(25 mg)和高剂量组(50 mg)。结果:本荟萃分析纳入5项随机对照试验,纳入1224例患者,结果显示阿普昔坦可降低平均坐位收缩压(msSBP)[低剂量亚组:平均差值(MD): -3.85 mmHg;95%置信区间(CI): -7.47 ~ -0.23;P = 0.040;中剂量组:MD: -5.56 mmHg;95% CI: -10.69 ~ -0.44;p = 0.030)],平均坐位舒张压(msDBP)(低剂量亚组:MD: -3.95 mmHg;95% CI: -4.06 ~ -3.85;P < 0.001;中剂量组:MD: -4.75 mmHg;95% CI: -5.91 ~ -3.60;p < 0.001), 24小时动态收缩压(maSBP)(低剂量组:MD: -4.18 mmHg;95% CI: -4.32 ~ -4.04;P < 0.001;中剂量组:MD: -5.89 mmHg;95% CI: -6.03 ~ -5.75;p < 0.001)和24小时动态舒张压(maDBP)(低剂量组:MD: -4.33 mmHg;95% CI: -4.42 ~ -4.24;P < 0.001;中剂量组:MD: -5.82 mmHg;95% CI: -5.91 ~ -5.73;P < 0.001)。在高剂量组,阿procitentan和安慰剂组在msSBP方面没有差异(MD: -4.83 mmHg;95% CI: -11.44 ~ 1.79;P = 0.150)。同时,阿procitentan的安全性良好,与安慰剂相比,在不良事件(ae)和严重不良事件(sae)的频率上没有显著差异。结论:阿普昔坦可显著降低血压,具有良好的安全性。然而,值得注意的是,大剂量的阿procitentan (50mg)并没有产生更好的降血压效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Critical Reappraisal of Takotsubo Syndrome (TS) and Myocarditis Association: "The Myocarditis-Like Features" Seen in TS Are Secondary Changes and not True Myocarditis. Functional Substrate Mapping in Ablation for Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia. Potential Similarity of Serum Cholesterol Multivariate Coefficients in the Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease Across Populations: A Review From the Seven Countries Study. Right Ventricular Function in Patients With Significant Tricuspid Regurgitation. Optimization of Distal Radial Access Into Clinical Routine Practice Through Ultrasound Guidance: A Review and Technical Guide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1