Outcomes in Catheter Ablation of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia in Myocarditis Compared with Ischemic Heart Disease.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.31083/RCM25604
Sheng Su, Le Li, Xi Peng, Likun Zhou, Zhuxin Zhang, Yulong Xiong, Zhenhao Zhang, Mengtong Xu, Yan Yao
{"title":"Outcomes in Catheter Ablation of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia in Myocarditis Compared with Ischemic Heart Disease.","authors":"Sheng Su, Le Li, Xi Peng, Likun Zhou, Zhuxin Zhang, Yulong Xiong, Zhenhao Zhang, Mengtong Xu, Yan Yao","doi":"10.31083/RCM25604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The substrates for arrhythmias in myocarditis and ischemic heart disease (IHD) are different, but it is yet to be determined whether there is a difference in outcomes following catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular tachycardia (VT) associated with these two conditions. This study aimed to compare outcomes after CA of VT in patients with myocarditis versus those with IHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing CA for sustained VT confirmed by endomyocardial biopsy as myocarditis, and patients with IHD experiencing sustained VT undergoing CA were retrospectively enrolled from February 2017 to March 2023. Initially, an endocardial approach was employed, reserving epicardial ablation procedures for non-responders. The primary endpoint was VT recurrence during follow up. All-cause mortality, repeat CA for VT and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation served as secondary endpoints. Kaplan-Meier curves compared outcomes between patient groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 109 patients with IHD and 20 patients with myocarditis who underwent CA for sustained VT, from February 2017 to March 2023. Compared with IHD patients, myocarditis patients had a statistically significant lower complete short-term success rate of CA (60.0% vs. 85.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.013). During a follow-up period of 37 ± 21 months, 8 (40.0%) myocarditis patients experienced VT recurrence compared to 57 (52.3%) IHD patients, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. During follow-up, 2 (10.0%) myocarditis patients died and 2 (10.0%) underwent repeat CA for VT recurrence, while 9 (8.3%) IHD patients died, 14 (12.8%) underwent a second CA for VT recurrence, and 8 (7.3%) received an ICD implantation. Additionally, there were no notable variations between the two groups regarding all-cause mortality, repeat CA for VT and ICD implantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was demonstrated that the efficacy of CA in sustained VT in myocarditis patients was similar to that in IHD. For myocarditis patients with VT, CA might be equally effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":"25604"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM25604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The substrates for arrhythmias in myocarditis and ischemic heart disease (IHD) are different, but it is yet to be determined whether there is a difference in outcomes following catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular tachycardia (VT) associated with these two conditions. This study aimed to compare outcomes after CA of VT in patients with myocarditis versus those with IHD.

Methods: Patients undergoing CA for sustained VT confirmed by endomyocardial biopsy as myocarditis, and patients with IHD experiencing sustained VT undergoing CA were retrospectively enrolled from February 2017 to March 2023. Initially, an endocardial approach was employed, reserving epicardial ablation procedures for non-responders. The primary endpoint was VT recurrence during follow up. All-cause mortality, repeat CA for VT and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation served as secondary endpoints. Kaplan-Meier curves compared outcomes between patient groups.

Results: This study included 109 patients with IHD and 20 patients with myocarditis who underwent CA for sustained VT, from February 2017 to March 2023. Compared with IHD patients, myocarditis patients had a statistically significant lower complete short-term success rate of CA (60.0% vs. 85.3%, p = 0.013). During a follow-up period of 37 ± 21 months, 8 (40.0%) myocarditis patients experienced VT recurrence compared to 57 (52.3%) IHD patients, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. During follow-up, 2 (10.0%) myocarditis patients died and 2 (10.0%) underwent repeat CA for VT recurrence, while 9 (8.3%) IHD patients died, 14 (12.8%) underwent a second CA for VT recurrence, and 8 (7.3%) received an ICD implantation. Additionally, there were no notable variations between the two groups regarding all-cause mortality, repeat CA for VT and ICD implantation.

Conclusions: It was demonstrated that the efficacy of CA in sustained VT in myocarditis patients was similar to that in IHD. For myocarditis patients with VT, CA might be equally effective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心肌炎与缺血性心脏病患者持续性室性心动过速的导管消融疗效比较。
背景:心肌炎和缺血性心脏病(IHD)的心律失常的底物不同,但尚不清楚导管消融(CA)治疗与这两种疾病相关的室性心动过速(VT)后的结果是否有差异。本研究的目的是比较心肌炎患者与IHD患者房颤停搏后的结果。方法:回顾性纳入2017年2月至2023年3月,经心肌内膜活检证实为心肌炎的持续性VT行CA的患者,以及行CA的持续性VT的IHD患者。最初,采用心内膜入路,对无反应者保留心外膜消融手术。主要终点为随访期间室速复发。全因死亡率、房颤重复CA和植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入作为次要终点。Kaplan-Meier曲线比较了患者组之间的结果。结果:该研究纳入了2017年2月至2023年3月期间109例IHD患者和20例心肌炎患者因持续VT接受CA治疗。与IHD患者相比,心肌炎患者CA的短期完全成功率(60.0% vs 85.3%, p = 0.013)有统计学意义。在37±21个月的随访中,心肌炎患者有8例(40.0%)房颤复发,IHD患者有57例(52.3%)房颤复发,两组间差异无统计学意义。随访期间,2例(10.0%)心肌炎患者死亡,2例(10.0%)因室速复发再次行CA, 9例(8.3%)IHD患者死亡,14例(12.8%)因室速复发再次行CA, 8例(7.3%)接受ICD植入。此外,两组在全因死亡率、室性心动过速重复CA和ICD植入方面无显著差异。结论:CA治疗心肌炎患者持续室速的效果与IHD患者相似。对于伴有室性心动过速的心肌炎患者,CA可能同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Critical Reappraisal of Takotsubo Syndrome (TS) and Myocarditis Association: "The Myocarditis-Like Features" Seen in TS Are Secondary Changes and not True Myocarditis. Functional Substrate Mapping in Ablation for Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia. Potential Similarity of Serum Cholesterol Multivariate Coefficients in the Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease Across Populations: A Review From the Seven Countries Study. Right Ventricular Function in Patients With Significant Tricuspid Regurgitation. Optimization of Distal Radial Access Into Clinical Routine Practice Through Ultrasound Guidance: A Review and Technical Guide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1