Prognostic Value of the Tricuspid Regurgitation Impact on Outcomes (TRIO) Score in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.31083/RCM26504
Jizhong Wang, Yuanwei Chen, Xuxing Zhang, Songyuan Luo, Jie Li, Fang Pei, Jianfang Luo
{"title":"Prognostic Value of the Tricuspid Regurgitation Impact on Outcomes (TRIO) Score in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.","authors":"Jizhong Wang, Yuanwei Chen, Xuxing Zhang, Songyuan Luo, Jie Li, Fang Pei, Jianfang Luo","doi":"10.31083/RCM26504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prognosis assessments for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients remain challenging, particularly as the indications for TAVI expand to lower-risk patients. This study assessed the prognostic value of the tricuspid regurgitation impact on outcomes (TRIO) score in patients after TAVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center study included 530 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI. Patients with a TRIO score >4 were compared to those with a score ≤4. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, while secondary outcomes included complications defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 (VARC-2) criteria and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including mortality, stroke, and heart failure rehospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a mean follow-up period of 22 months, patients with a TRIO score >4 had significantly higher rates of mortality (11.5% vs. 3.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and MACEs (14.9% vs. 3.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified a TRIO score >4 as an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR): 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-5.37, <i>p</i> = 0.032) and MACEs (HR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.34-5.75, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Patients with a higher TRIO score also had significantly higher rates of stroke (3.1% vs. 0.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.028), acute kidney injury (10.1% vs. 4.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.011), and MACEs (14.9% vs. 3.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) within 30 days after TAVI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TRIO score was associated with all-cause mortality and MACEs in patients after a TAVI. The TRIO score could serve as a convenient tool for risk stratification in clinical practice, aiding in identifying high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":"26504"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760539/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM26504","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prognosis assessments for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients remain challenging, particularly as the indications for TAVI expand to lower-risk patients. This study assessed the prognostic value of the tricuspid regurgitation impact on outcomes (TRIO) score in patients after TAVI.

Methods: This single-center study included 530 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI. Patients with a TRIO score >4 were compared to those with a score ≤4. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, while secondary outcomes included complications defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 (VARC-2) criteria and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including mortality, stroke, and heart failure rehospitalization.

Results: Over a mean follow-up period of 22 months, patients with a TRIO score >4 had significantly higher rates of mortality (11.5% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001) and MACEs (14.9% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified a TRIO score >4 as an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR): 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-5.37, p = 0.032) and MACEs (HR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.34-5.75, p = 0.006). Patients with a higher TRIO score also had significantly higher rates of stroke (3.1% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.028), acute kidney injury (10.1% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.011), and MACEs (14.9% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001) within 30 days after TAVI.

Conclusions: The TRIO score was associated with all-cause mortality and MACEs in patients after a TAVI. The TRIO score could serve as a convenient tool for risk stratification in clinical practice, aiding in identifying high-risk patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者三尖瓣反流对预后(TRIO)评分的影响。
背景:经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者的预后评估仍然具有挑战性,特别是当TAVI的适应症扩展到低风险患者时。本研究评估了TAVI术后三尖瓣反流对预后(TRIO)评分的影响。方法:这项单中心研究纳入了530例连续接受TAVI的患者。将TRIO评分为bbbb4的患者与评分≤4的患者进行比较。主要结局是全因死亡率,次要结局包括瓣膜学术研究联盟2 (VARC-2)标准定义的并发症和主要不良心血管事件(mace),包括死亡率、中风和心力衰竭再住院。结果:在平均22个月的随访期间,TRIO评分为bbbb4的患者死亡率(11.5% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001)和mace (14.9% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001)显著高于对照组。多变量Cox回归分析发现,TRIO评分bbbb4是全因死亡率(危险比(HR): 2.41, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.08-5.37, p = 0.032)和mace (HR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.34-5.75, p = 0.006)的独立危险因素。TRIO评分较高的患者在TAVI后30天内卒中发生率(3.1% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.028)、急性肾损伤发生率(10.1% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.011)和mace发生率(14.9% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001)也显著较高。结论:TRIO评分与TAVI后患者的全因死亡率和mace相关。在临床实践中,TRIO评分可以作为一种方便的风险分层工具,帮助识别高危患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Bridging the Gap in AL and ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis: Integrating Histopathology, Biomarkers, and Multimodal Imaging for Subtype-Specific Diagnosis. The Prognostic Gender-Related Value of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome. Epicardial Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: A Contemporary Review of Indications, Techniques, and Practical Approaches for Challenging Substrates. Heterogeneity and Clinical Translation of Cardiac-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Heart Failure: From Mechanisms to Precision Therapeutics. Resistant Hypertension: Integration of Novel Agents and Interventional Approaches in Clinical Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1