Postoperative Hemorrhage in Patients with Aneurysms Associated with Arteriovenous Malformations. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123719
Valentina Corpus-Gutiérrez , Paula A. Beltrán-Guevara , Mariana Angarita-Avendaño , Felipe Ramirez-Velandia , Maria A. Del Castillo-Forero , Laura Bejarano-Mora , Juan C. Puentes-Vargas
{"title":"Postoperative Hemorrhage in Patients with Aneurysms Associated with Arteriovenous Malformations. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Valentina Corpus-Gutiérrez ,&nbsp;Paula A. Beltrán-Guevara ,&nbsp;Mariana Angarita-Avendaño ,&nbsp;Felipe Ramirez-Velandia ,&nbsp;Maria A. Del Castillo-Forero ,&nbsp;Laura Bejarano-Mora ,&nbsp;Juan C. Puentes-Vargas","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the rates of postoperative hemorrhages (PHs) for aneurysms associated with brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM) evaluating the lesion that was initially treated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review of the literature was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. After the data extraction, the total numbers and percentages were calculated through summary statistics and were subject to meta-analysis. The methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the ROBINS-I tool and to determine the certainty of the evidence, we utilized the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of the 738 records screened, 28 studies were chosen for data extraction with a total of 1671 patients. Hemorrhagic presentation was observed between 38% and 100% of patients across the studies included. The pooled period prevalence of PH after intervention was 6% (95% confidence interval [CI = 0.03–0.07). Stratified analysis according to which lesion was treated first demonstrated a slightly lower rates of PH when aneurysms were treated first, compared when the AVM was managed first or if both lesions were treated simultaneously (<em>P</em> = 0.02). Rates of hemorrhage for lesions in the infratentorial location (0.21; 95% CI = 0.01–0.42) were much higher after intervention compared to noninfratentorial location (0.05; 95% CI = 0.03–0.07), and this difference reached statistical significance (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Hemorrhage rates were lower when treating the aneurysm first, but their risk was higher when treating infratentorial lesions. The decision on which lesion should be treated first should be individualized according to the feeder vessels, the AVM and aneurysmal size, location, and overall functionality of the patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 123719"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875025000750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare the rates of postoperative hemorrhages (PHs) for aneurysms associated with brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM) evaluating the lesion that was initially treated.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. After the data extraction, the total numbers and percentages were calculated through summary statistics and were subject to meta-analysis. The methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the ROBINS-I tool and to determine the certainty of the evidence, we utilized the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology.

Results

Out of the 738 records screened, 28 studies were chosen for data extraction with a total of 1671 patients. Hemorrhagic presentation was observed between 38% and 100% of patients across the studies included. The pooled period prevalence of PH after intervention was 6% (95% confidence interval [CI = 0.03–0.07). Stratified analysis according to which lesion was treated first demonstrated a slightly lower rates of PH when aneurysms were treated first, compared when the AVM was managed first or if both lesions were treated simultaneously (P = 0.02). Rates of hemorrhage for lesions in the infratentorial location (0.21; 95% CI = 0.01–0.42) were much higher after intervention compared to noninfratentorial location (0.05; 95% CI = 0.03–0.07), and this difference reached statistical significance (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Hemorrhage rates were lower when treating the aneurysm first, but their risk was higher when treating infratentorial lesions. The decision on which lesion should be treated first should be individualized according to the feeder vessels, the AVM and aneurysmal size, location, and overall functionality of the patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动脉瘤伴动静脉畸形的术后出血。系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:比较脑动静脉畸形相关动脉瘤术后出血的发生率,以评估其最初治疗的病变。方法:根据PRISMA指南对相关文献进行系统回顾。检索在PubMed, Embase和Scopus中进行。数据提取后,通过汇总统计计算总数和百分比,并进行meta分析。使用ROBINS-I工具评估方法学质量和偏倚风险,为了确定证据的确定性,我们使用GRADE方法学。结果:在筛选的738条记录中,选择了28项研究进行数据提取,共1,671例患者。在所有纳入的研究中,有38%至100%的患者出现出血症状。干预后术后出血(PH)的总发生率为6% (95% CI=0.03-0.07)。根据先治疗哪个病变分层分析显示,与先治疗AVM或同时治疗两个病变相比,先治疗动脉瘤的PH率略低(p=0.02)。幕下病变出血率(0.21;95% CI=0.01-0.42),干预后明显高于非幕下定位(0.05;95% CI=0.03-0.07),差异有统计学意义(p结论:先治疗动脉瘤出血率较低,但治疗幕下病变出血风险较高。应根据供血血管、动静脉畸形和动脉瘤的大小、位置和患者的整体功能来决定首先治疗哪个病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Exoscopic resection of an Olfactory Groove Meningioma through an Anterior Interhemispheric Approach. Microsurgical and Endoscopic Characterization of the Anteroinferior Wall of the Cavernous Sinus: A Cadaveric Study at the Intersection of Anatomical Fossae. Technical Note: A Protocol to Preserve the Dural Safety Margin During Simultaneous Hybrid Lumbar Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy and Cervical Laminoplasty. Evaluation of a 3D Simulation Model for Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Validity Study in Neurosurgical Residency Training. Neurosurgery education in Andean Latin America: disparities in access to neuroanatomy lectures and their effect on academic excellence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1