Editor's Choice – A European Delphi Consensus on the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Patients with Heritable Aortic Diseases

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.01.033
Daniel Gil-Sala , Julie De Backer , Isabelle Van Herzeele , Gisela Teixidó-Tura , Anders Wanhainen , Sergi Bellmunt-Montoya
{"title":"Editor's Choice – A European Delphi Consensus on the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Patients with Heritable Aortic Diseases","authors":"Daniel Gil-Sala ,&nbsp;Julie De Backer ,&nbsp;Isabelle Van Herzeele ,&nbsp;Gisela Teixidó-Tura ,&nbsp;Anders Wanhainen ,&nbsp;Sergi Bellmunt-Montoya","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.01.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a patient with an underlying heritable aortic disease (HAD) is rare, and evidence based recommendations for its management are lacking. This study aimed to generate a consensus from multidisciplinary specialists on the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of AAA associated with HAD and to define topics of interest for future research.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A Delphi consensus was designed involving European multidisciplinary specialists and reported using the ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) reporting guideline. Four rounds were carried out by email: the first two rounds to agree on the content of the questionnaire and the final two rounds to reach an agreement. Questions focused on the composition of the team, imaging, clinical suspicion, genetic testing, medical management, indications for surgical repair, surgical technique, surveillance, exercise, and quality of life. The level of agreement for each question was graded using a Likert type scale and classified into four categories: A (very strong), B (strong), C (fair), and D (no agreement).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 35 experts from 18 different hospitals and 10 different countries participated in the study: 19 vascular surgeons, 11 cardiologists, four geneticists, and one cardiac surgeon. Of the 97 statements of the final questionnaire, 16 were graded A (16%), 23 B (24%), five C (5%), 44 D (45%) and nine (9%) were invalid. The experts highlighted the need to develop personalised therapies for each pathology, as well as international multicentre databases to collect data on the natural course of AAA patients with HAD.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This Delphi process led to consensus on several aspects of care for patients with AAA and underlying HAD, providing guidance to manage them in a more standardised fashion. The agreements reached focus on multidisciplinary aortic teams, imaging and genetic diagnosis, treatment, and follow up. Furthermore, several topics for future research were identified.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":"69 5","pages":"Pages 723-731"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078588425001042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a patient with an underlying heritable aortic disease (HAD) is rare, and evidence based recommendations for its management are lacking. This study aimed to generate a consensus from multidisciplinary specialists on the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of AAA associated with HAD and to define topics of interest for future research.

Methods

A Delphi consensus was designed involving European multidisciplinary specialists and reported using the ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) reporting guideline. Four rounds were carried out by email: the first two rounds to agree on the content of the questionnaire and the final two rounds to reach an agreement. Questions focused on the composition of the team, imaging, clinical suspicion, genetic testing, medical management, indications for surgical repair, surgical technique, surveillance, exercise, and quality of life. The level of agreement for each question was graded using a Likert type scale and classified into four categories: A (very strong), B (strong), C (fair), and D (no agreement).

Results

A total of 35 experts from 18 different hospitals and 10 different countries participated in the study: 19 vascular surgeons, 11 cardiologists, four geneticists, and one cardiac surgeon. Of the 97 statements of the final questionnaire, 16 were graded A (16%), 23 B (24%), five C (5%), 44 D (45%) and nine (9%) were invalid. The experts highlighted the need to develop personalised therapies for each pathology, as well as international multicentre databases to collect data on the natural course of AAA patients with HAD.

Conclusion

This Delphi process led to consensus on several aspects of care for patients with AAA and underlying HAD, providing guidance to manage them in a more standardised fashion. The agreements reached focus on multidisciplinary aortic teams, imaging and genetic diagnosis, treatment, and follow up. Furthermore, several topics for future research were identified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遗传性主动脉疾病患者腹主动脉瘤治疗的欧洲德尔菲共识
目的:腹主动脉瘤(AAA)合并潜在遗传性主动脉疾病(HAD)的患者很少见,目前缺乏基于证据的治疗建议。本研究旨在从多学科专家那里就HAD相关的AAA的诊断、治疗和监测达成共识,并确定未来研究的兴趣主题。方法:设计德尔菲共识,涉及欧洲多学科专家,并使用准确共识报告文件(ACCORD)报告指南进行报告。通过电子邮件进行了四轮:前两轮就问卷内容达成一致,后两轮达成一致。问题集中在团队组成、影像学、临床怀疑、基因检测、医疗管理、手术修复指征、手术技术、监测、锻炼和生活质量等方面。每个问题的一致程度使用李克特量表进行评分,并分为四类:a(非常强),B(强),C(一般)和D(不一致)。结果:共有来自18家不同医院和10个不同国家的35名专家参与了这项研究:19名血管外科医生、11名心脏病专家、4名遗传学家和1名心脏外科医生。在最终问卷的97个陈述中,A级16个(16%),B级23个(24%),C级5个(5%),D级44个(45%)。专家们强调需要针对每种病理开发个性化的治疗方法,以及建立国际多中心数据库来收集AAA级HAD患者自然病程的数据。结论:这个德尔菲过程在AAA和潜在HAD患者护理的几个方面达成了共识,为以更标准化的方式管理他们提供了指导。达成的协议集中在多学科主动脉小组、影像学和基因诊断、治疗和随访。此外,还确定了未来研究的几个主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
471
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles. Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography for the Characterisation of Endoleaks after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Development and Feasibility of a Standardised Cine Protocol. Rapid Vertebral Erosion Due to Chronic Contained Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Benchmarking Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Radiation: Sweden's National Diagnostic Reference Levels as a Catalyst for Quality Improvement. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Women: Under Studied, Under Diagnosed, and Under Screened? Come on to the Femoral and Celebrate the FESTIVAL! But Are We Celebrating the Right Strategy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1