A European Delphi Consensus on the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Patients with Heritable Aortic Diseases.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.01.033
Daniel Gil-Sala, Julie De Backer, Isabelle Van Herzeele, Gisela Teixidó-Tura, Anders Wanhainen, Sergi Bellmunt-Montoya
{"title":"A European Delphi Consensus on the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Patients with Heritable Aortic Diseases.","authors":"Daniel Gil-Sala, Julie De Backer, Isabelle Van Herzeele, Gisela Teixidó-Tura, Anders Wanhainen, Sergi Bellmunt-Montoya","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.01.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a patient with an underlying heritable aortic disease (HAD) is rare, and evidence based recommendations for its management are lacking. This study aimed to generate a consensus from multidisciplinary specialists on the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of AAA associated with HAD and to define topics of interest for future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi consensus was designed involving European multidisciplinary specialists and reported using the ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) reporting guideline. Four rounds were carried out by email: the first two rounds to agree on the content of the questionnaire and the final two rounds to reach an agreement. Questions focused on the composition of the team, imaging, clinical suspicion, genetic testing, medical management, indications for surgical repair, surgical technique, surveillance, exercise, and quality of life. The level of agreement for each question was graded using a Likert type scale and classified into four categories: A (very strong), B (strong), C (fair), and D (no agreement).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 experts from 18 different hospitals and 10 different countries participated in the study: 19 vascular surgeons, 11 cardiologists, four geneticists, and one cardiac surgeon. Of the 97 statements of the final questionnaire, 16 were graded A (16%), 23 B (24%), five C (5%), and 44 D (45%). The experts highlighted the need to develop personalised therapies for each pathology, as well as international multicentre databases to collect data on the natural course of AAA patients with HAD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This Delphi process led to consensus on several aspects of care for patients with AAA and underlying HAD, providing guidance to manage them in a more standardised fashion. The agreements reached focus on the multidisciplinary aortic teams, imaging and genetic diagnosis, treatment, and follow up. Furthermore, several topics for future research were identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.01.033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a patient with an underlying heritable aortic disease (HAD) is rare, and evidence based recommendations for its management are lacking. This study aimed to generate a consensus from multidisciplinary specialists on the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of AAA associated with HAD and to define topics of interest for future research.

Methods: A Delphi consensus was designed involving European multidisciplinary specialists and reported using the ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) reporting guideline. Four rounds were carried out by email: the first two rounds to agree on the content of the questionnaire and the final two rounds to reach an agreement. Questions focused on the composition of the team, imaging, clinical suspicion, genetic testing, medical management, indications for surgical repair, surgical technique, surveillance, exercise, and quality of life. The level of agreement for each question was graded using a Likert type scale and classified into four categories: A (very strong), B (strong), C (fair), and D (no agreement).

Results: A total of 35 experts from 18 different hospitals and 10 different countries participated in the study: 19 vascular surgeons, 11 cardiologists, four geneticists, and one cardiac surgeon. Of the 97 statements of the final questionnaire, 16 were graded A (16%), 23 B (24%), five C (5%), and 44 D (45%). The experts highlighted the need to develop personalised therapies for each pathology, as well as international multicentre databases to collect data on the natural course of AAA patients with HAD.

Conclusion: This Delphi process led to consensus on several aspects of care for patients with AAA and underlying HAD, providing guidance to manage them in a more standardised fashion. The agreements reached focus on the multidisciplinary aortic teams, imaging and genetic diagnosis, treatment, and follow up. Furthermore, several topics for future research were identified.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
471
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles. Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Proposal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Guidelines to Stratify Surveillance after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair in a Single Centre. Staring at the Future, Looking for the Bigger Picture. To Be or Not to Be: Primary or Staged Brachiobasilic Arteriovenous Fistula; That Is The Question. Correlation Between Lean Psoas Muscle Area and Incidence of Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Open Surgery. Varicography Guided Foam Sclerotherapy for Symptomatic Extrapelvic Varices Originating from Clitoris Pelvic Escape Point.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1