Performance of a Toric, Monthly, Soft Contact Lens in Digital Device Users.

IF 1.8 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Clinical Optometry Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTO.S505701

Andrew D Pucker, Quentin X Franklin, Amy F Perkins, Kristopher May, Shane R Kannarr, Morgan Bromley, Chris Lievens

{"title":"Performance of a Toric, Monthly, Soft Contact Lens in Digital Device Users.","authors":"Andrew D Pucker, Quentin X Franklin, Amy F Perkins, Kristopher May, Shane R Kannarr, Morgan Bromley, Chris Lievens","doi":"10.2147/OPTO.S505701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To determine the performance of TOTAL30 for Astigmatism (T30fA; Alcon; Fort Worth, TX, USA) contact lenses (CLs) in existing CL wearers who are also frequent digital device users.Methods: This 1-month, 3-visit study recruited adult, 18- to 40-year-old subjects who were required to use daily digital devices for at least 8 hours per day. All subjects were refit into T30fA CLs. A text message visual analog scale (VAS) (±50 scale; positive being comfortable) evaluate at-home eye comfort across the day at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month. Subjects were evaluated at 1 month with the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q), Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Quality of Life questionnaire, and a custom questionnaire.Results: A total 48 subjects were analyzed (mean age = 28.8 ± 6.3 years; 75% female). At 1 month, IDEEL daily activities, feelings, and work domains scores were 96.7 ± 6.6, 96.4 ± 6.2, and 94.8 ± 8.6, respectively. CVS-Q scores were 3.48 ± 3.73. Most of the subjects indicated that they were satisfied with the overall performance of the study CLs (81.3%) and with their level of eye strain with the study CLs (87.3%). When evaluating CL comfort with the VAS, comfort did not differ across the month at each time point (all p-value ≥ 0.16), yet CL comfort did decrease minimally across the wear day (all p-value < 0.001).Conclusion: These data suggest that the monthly study CLs can provide an excellent wearing experience for those with frequent digital device use.","PeriodicalId":43701,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Optometry","volume":"17 ","pages":"11-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S505701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the performance of TOTAL30 for Astigmatism (T30fA; Alcon; Fort Worth, TX, USA) contact lenses (CLs) in existing CL wearers who are also frequent digital device users.

Methods: This 1-month, 3-visit study recruited adult, 18- to 40-year-old subjects who were required to use daily digital devices for at least 8 hours per day. All subjects were refit into T30fA CLs. A text message visual analog scale (VAS) (±50 scale; positive being comfortable) evaluate at-home eye comfort across the day at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month. Subjects were evaluated at 1 month with the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q), Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Quality of Life questionnaire, and a custom questionnaire.

Results: A total 48 subjects were analyzed (mean age = 28.8 ± 6.3 years; 75% female). At 1 month, IDEEL daily activities, feelings, and work domains scores were 96.7 ± 6.6, 96.4 ± 6.2, and 94.8 ± 8.6, respectively. CVS-Q scores were 3.48 ± 3.73. Most of the subjects indicated that they were satisfied with the overall performance of the study CLs (81.3%) and with their level of eye strain with the study CLs (87.3%). When evaluating CL comfort with the VAS, comfort did not differ across the month at each time point (all p-value ≥ 0.16), yet CL comfort did decrease minimally across the wear day (all p-value < 0.001).

Conclusion: These data suggest that the monthly study CLs can provide an excellent wearing experience for those with frequent digital device use.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

环形、月型、软性隐形眼镜在数字设备用户中的性能。

目的：测定TOTAL30检测散光(T30fA；爱尔康;沃斯堡，德克萨斯州，美国)隐形眼镜（CLs）的现有佩戴者，也经常使用数字设备。方法：这项为期1个月，3次访问的研究招募了18至40岁的成年人，他们被要求每天至少使用8小时的数字设备。所有受试者均改装为T30fA CLs。短信视觉模拟量表（VAS）(±50分；积极是舒适)评估在家中的眼睛舒适度在一天，一周和一个月。受试者在1个月时使用计算机视觉综合征问卷（CVS-Q）、干眼对日常生活的影响（IDEEL）生活质量问卷和自定义问卷对其进行评估。结果：共纳入48例患者，平均年龄28.8±6.3岁；75%的女性)。1个月时，IDEEL日常活动、感觉和工作领域得分分别为96.7±6.6、96.4±6.2和94.8±8.6。CVS-Q评分为3.48±3.73。大多数受试者表示，他们对研究CLs的整体表现（81.3%）和他们的眼疲劳水平（87.3%）感到满意。当使用VAS评估CL舒适度时，每个时间点的舒适性在一个月内没有差异（所有p值均≥0.16），但在整个佩戴日中CL舒适度确实有最小程度的下降（所有p值均< 0.001）。结论：这些数据表明，每月研究CLs可以为频繁使用数字设备的人提供良好的佩戴体验。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

5.90%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks

期刊介绍： Clinical Optometry is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on clinical optometry. All aspects of patient care are addressed within the journal as well as the practice of optometry including economic and business analyses. Basic and clinical research papers are published that cover all aspects of optics, refraction and its application to the theory and practice of optometry. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Theoretical and applied optics, Delivery of patient care in optometry practice, Refraction and correction of errors, Screening and preventative aspects of eye disease, Extended clinical roles for optometrists including shared care and provision of medications, Teaching and training optometrists, International aspects of optometry, Business practice, Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction, Health economic evaluations.