Volume–Outcome Relationship of Norwood Procedures: Insights from the National Pediatric Cardiology–Quality Improvement Collaborative Database

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.01.007
Michal Schäfer MD, PhD , Carol McFarland MD , Venugopal Amula MD , Dongngan Truong MD , Linda M. Lambert APRN , Eric R. Griffiths MD , Aaron W. Eckhauser MD, MS , S. Adil Husain MD , Reilly D. Hobbs MD, MBS
{"title":"Volume–Outcome Relationship of Norwood Procedures: Insights from the National Pediatric Cardiology–Quality Improvement Collaborative Database","authors":"Michal Schäfer MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Carol McFarland MD ,&nbsp;Venugopal Amula MD ,&nbsp;Dongngan Truong MD ,&nbsp;Linda M. Lambert APRN ,&nbsp;Eric R. Griffiths MD ,&nbsp;Aaron W. Eckhauser MD, MS ,&nbsp;S. Adil Husain MD ,&nbsp;Reilly D. Hobbs MD, MBS","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Prior investigations of the center-specific case volume on outcomes in hypoplastic left heart syndrome have conflicting results. This study utilized the National Pediatric Cardiology–Quality Improvement Collaborative registry to investigate the center volume–outcome relationship in patients after the Norwood procedure with consideration of preoperative high-risk features.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between 2016 and 2023, centers were categorized by Norwood procedure volume into low- (≤5 cases/y), medium- (6 to 10 cases/y), and high-volume centers (&gt;10 cases/y). We compared preoperative high-risk features between the center volume categories and assessed survival outcomes, focusing on 30-day and 1-year mortality. We further compared short-term perioperative morbidity outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 3397 patients from 69 institutions participating in the National Pediatric Cardiology–Quality Improvement Collaborative. Twenty-nine centers were classified as a low-, 20 as medium-, and 20 as high-volume centers. There was no difference in frequency of preoperative high-risk features among the center categories in the majority of considered variables. There was no association between the volume categories and 30-day mortality. Low-volume and medium-volume were associated with higher risk of 1-year mortality. This difference remained when adjusting for the presence of high-risk features (Low: odds ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.03-1.60], <em>P</em> = .020; Medium: odds ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.05-1.86], <em>P</em> = .025). Postoperative comorbidities were more frequent in low- and medium-volume centers, including the need for diagnostic and interventional catheterization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients undergoing Norwood procedure in low- and medium-volume centers have worse 1-year mortality. The outcome characteristics are potentiated when adjusted for high-risk features, with significantly higher survival and lower morbidity in patients treated in high-volume centers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":"119 5","pages":"Pages 1045-1052"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003497525000712","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Prior investigations of the center-specific case volume on outcomes in hypoplastic left heart syndrome have conflicting results. This study utilized the National Pediatric Cardiology–Quality Improvement Collaborative registry to investigate the center volume–outcome relationship in patients after the Norwood procedure with consideration of preoperative high-risk features.

Methods

Between 2016 and 2023, centers were categorized by Norwood procedure volume into low- (≤5 cases/y), medium- (6 to 10 cases/y), and high-volume centers (>10 cases/y). We compared preoperative high-risk features between the center volume categories and assessed survival outcomes, focusing on 30-day and 1-year mortality. We further compared short-term perioperative morbidity outcomes.

Results

We analyzed 3397 patients from 69 institutions participating in the National Pediatric Cardiology–Quality Improvement Collaborative. Twenty-nine centers were classified as a low-, 20 as medium-, and 20 as high-volume centers. There was no difference in frequency of preoperative high-risk features among the center categories in the majority of considered variables. There was no association between the volume categories and 30-day mortality. Low-volume and medium-volume were associated with higher risk of 1-year mortality. This difference remained when adjusting for the presence of high-risk features (Low: odds ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.03-1.60], P = .020; Medium: odds ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.05-1.86], P = .025). Postoperative comorbidities were more frequent in low- and medium-volume centers, including the need for diagnostic and interventional catheterization.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing Norwood procedure in low- and medium-volume centers have worse 1-year mortality. The outcome characteristics are potentiated when adjusted for high-risk features, with significantly higher survival and lower morbidity in patients treated in high-volume centers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诺伍德程序的体积-结果关系:来自国家儿科心脏病学-质量改进协作数据库的见解。
背景:先前对中心特定病例量的左心发育不全综合征结果的调查结果相互矛盾。本研究利用国家儿科心脏病学质量改善协作(NPC-QIC)注册表,在考虑术前高危特征的情况下,调查诺伍德手术后患者的中心容量与预后的关系。方法:2016 - 2023年,按诺伍德手术量将中心分为低(≤5例/年)、中(6 ~ 10例/年)和高(10 ~ 10例/年)。我们比较了中心容积类别的术前高危特征,并评估了生存结果,重点是30天和1年死亡率。我们进一步比较了短期围手术期发病率结果。结果:我们分析了来自69家参与NPC-QIC的机构的3397例患者。29个中心被归类为低容量中心,20个为中等容量中心,20个为高容量中心。在大多数考虑的变量中,中心类别之间术前高危特征的频率没有差异。体积类别与30天死亡率之间没有关联。小容量和中容量与较高的1年死亡率相关。当调整高危特征的存在时,这种差异仍然存在(Low: OR (95%CI) 1.40 (1.03-1.60), P=0.020;中:OR (95%CI) 1.28 (1.05-1.86), P=0.025)。术后合并症在小、中容积中心更为常见,包括需要诊断和介入导尿。结论:在中小容量中心接受诺伍德手术的患者1年死亡率更低。在大容量中心接受治疗的患者中,当考虑到具有显著较高生存率和较低发病率的高危特征时,结果特征得到增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1235
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features: • Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques • New Technology articles • Case reports • "How-to-do-it" features • Reviews of current literature • Supplements on symposia • Commentary pieces and correspondence • CME • Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery. An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Transcatheter vs Surgical Tricuspid Valve Repair: An Analysis of Medicare Beneficiaries. Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With or Without Mitral Valve Repair for Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation. Results of a Preoperative Screening Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol in Neonates Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Mechanical atrioventricular valve replacement during and after the single ventricle palliation. Successful Atrioventricular Valve Repair Modifies Clinical Outcomes in Single Ventricle Patients: Multistate Model Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1