Assessment of the interobserver and the intraobserver reproducibility for the detection of renal cortical defects in adults and children using [99mTc]Tc-MAG3.

Mohammed Hashlan, Stuart More, Elton Mukonda, Anita Brink
{"title":"Assessment of the interobserver and the intraobserver reproducibility for the detection of renal cortical defects in adults and children using [99mTc]Tc-MAG3.","authors":"Mohammed Hashlan, Stuart More, Elton Mukonda, Anita Brink","doi":"10.23736/S1824-4785.24.03567-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One can assess cortical defects on the early images of [99mTc]Tc-MAG3 renography. We aimed to assess interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility for detecting renal cortical defects using [99mTc]Tc-MAG3 for adults and children; identify causes for poor inter- and intraobserver reproducibility and to assess the effect of the kidney to background ratio (KTBR) on reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred adult and 200 pediatric renograms were included. The observers reviewed the summed 1-minute posterior images for the first four minutes to detect cortical defects. Interobserver reproducibility between three observers and intra-observer reproducibility for two observers were determined. Agreement was tested using percentage agreement, Krippendorff's reliability coefficient alpha and Cohen's kappa statistic. The association between KTBR and agreement was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interobserver agreement on the 1-2 minutes images was 78 (95% CI: 74.8-82.7%) and 79.7 (95% CI: 75.9-83.5%) for left and right kidneys respectively. Intraobserver percentage was 89.7% (95% CI: 86.2-93.1%) for the senior and 80.7% (95% CI: 76.2-85.2%) for the junior observer. In 13.5% (27) of the adult and 4.5% (19) of the pediatric kidneys the difference in image interpretation between the observers would have had a clinical impact. If the KTBR is ≤2, the percentage agreement was between 61.5% and 64.8%. In cases with a KTBR >2, the percentage agreement was between 83.6% and 87.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The percentage interobserver agreement was moderate. Disagreement between normal and abnormal cases were infrequent. The interobserver reproducibility was decreased when the KTBR was ≤2.</p>","PeriodicalId":49135,"journal":{"name":"the Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"the Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1824-4785.24.03567-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One can assess cortical defects on the early images of [99mTc]Tc-MAG3 renography. We aimed to assess interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility for detecting renal cortical defects using [99mTc]Tc-MAG3 for adults and children; identify causes for poor inter- and intraobserver reproducibility and to assess the effect of the kidney to background ratio (KTBR) on reproducibility.

Methods: One hundred adult and 200 pediatric renograms were included. The observers reviewed the summed 1-minute posterior images for the first four minutes to detect cortical defects. Interobserver reproducibility between three observers and intra-observer reproducibility for two observers were determined. Agreement was tested using percentage agreement, Krippendorff's reliability coefficient alpha and Cohen's kappa statistic. The association between KTBR and agreement was evaluated.

Results: Interobserver agreement on the 1-2 minutes images was 78 (95% CI: 74.8-82.7%) and 79.7 (95% CI: 75.9-83.5%) for left and right kidneys respectively. Intraobserver percentage was 89.7% (95% CI: 86.2-93.1%) for the senior and 80.7% (95% CI: 76.2-85.2%) for the junior observer. In 13.5% (27) of the adult and 4.5% (19) of the pediatric kidneys the difference in image interpretation between the observers would have had a clinical impact. If the KTBR is ≤2, the percentage agreement was between 61.5% and 64.8%. In cases with a KTBR >2, the percentage agreement was between 83.6% and 87.1%.

Conclusions: The percentage interobserver agreement was moderate. Disagreement between normal and abnormal cases were infrequent. The interobserver reproducibility was decreased when the KTBR was ≤2.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
the Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
the Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging publishes scientific papers on clinical and experimental topics of nuclear medicine. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles and special articles. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the interobserver and the intraobserver reproducibility for the detection of renal cortical defects in adults and children using [99mTc]Tc-MAG3. Radioembolization of HCC and secondary hepatic tumors: a comprehensive review. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy with SPECT/CT. PET/MRI evaluation of hepatobiliary tumors. A review of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in the evaluation and treatment of hepatobiliary tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1