Secondary Stroke Prevention in Ontario: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1017/cjn.2025.9
Jamie L Fleet, Moira K Kapral, Brooke Carter, Stephanie Frisbee, Melody Lam, Salimah Z Shariff
{"title":"Secondary Stroke Prevention in Ontario: A Population-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Jamie L Fleet, Moira K Kapral, Brooke Carter, Stephanie Frisbee, Melody Lam, Salimah Z Shariff","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2025.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Secondary stroke prevention can reduce subsequent vascular events, mortality and accumulation of disability. Current rates of adherence to secondary stroke prevention indicators are unknown. Our aim was to evaluate secondary stroke prevention care in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using health administrative databases included all adults discharged alive following an ischemic stroke from April 2010 to March 2019. Indicators of secondary stroke prevention, including laboratory testing, physician visits and receipt of routine influenza vaccinations, were evaluated among survivors in the one year following a stroke event. The use of medication was also assessed among individuals over the age of 65 years and within subgroups of stroke survivors with diabetes and atrial fibrillation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After exclusions, 54,712 individuals (mean age 68.4 years, 45.7% female) survived at least one year following their stroke event. In the 90 days following discharge from the hospital, most individuals (92.8%) were seen by a general practitioner, while 26.2% visited an emergency department. Within the year following discharge, 66.2% and 61.4% were tested for low-density lipoprotein and glycated hemoglobin, respectively, and 39.6% received an influenza vaccine. Among those over the age of 65 years, 85.5% were prescribed a lipid-lowering agent, and 88.7% were prescribed at least one antihypertensive medication. In those with diabetes, 70.3% were prescribed an antihyperglycemic medication, while 84.9% with atrial fibrillation were prescribed an anticoagulant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Secondary stroke prevention, especially for important laboratory values, remains suboptimal, despite thorough best practice guidelines. Future studies should explore barriers to better secondary stroke care.</p>","PeriodicalId":56134,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2025.9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Secondary stroke prevention can reduce subsequent vascular events, mortality and accumulation of disability. Current rates of adherence to secondary stroke prevention indicators are unknown. Our aim was to evaluate secondary stroke prevention care in Ontario, Canada.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study using health administrative databases included all adults discharged alive following an ischemic stroke from April 2010 to March 2019. Indicators of secondary stroke prevention, including laboratory testing, physician visits and receipt of routine influenza vaccinations, were evaluated among survivors in the one year following a stroke event. The use of medication was also assessed among individuals over the age of 65 years and within subgroups of stroke survivors with diabetes and atrial fibrillation.

Results: After exclusions, 54,712 individuals (mean age 68.4 years, 45.7% female) survived at least one year following their stroke event. In the 90 days following discharge from the hospital, most individuals (92.8%) were seen by a general practitioner, while 26.2% visited an emergency department. Within the year following discharge, 66.2% and 61.4% were tested for low-density lipoprotein and glycated hemoglobin, respectively, and 39.6% received an influenza vaccine. Among those over the age of 65 years, 85.5% were prescribed a lipid-lowering agent, and 88.7% were prescribed at least one antihypertensive medication. In those with diabetes, 70.3% were prescribed an antihyperglycemic medication, while 84.9% with atrial fibrillation were prescribed an anticoagulant.

Conclusion: Secondary stroke prevention, especially for important laboratory values, remains suboptimal, despite thorough best practice guidelines. Future studies should explore barriers to better secondary stroke care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安大略省二级卒中预防:一项基于人群的队列研究。
背景:二级卒中预防可以减少随后的血管事件、死亡率和残疾积累。目前对二级卒中预防指标的依从率尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估加拿大安大略省的二级卒中预防护理。方法:使用卫生管理数据库进行回顾性队列研究,纳入2010年4月至2019年3月期间缺血性卒中后存活出院的所有成年人。二级中风预防指标,包括实验室检测、医生就诊和接受常规流感疫苗接种,在中风事件发生后的一年内对幸存者进行评估。在65岁以上的个体和伴有糖尿病和房颤的中风幸存者亚组中,也评估了药物的使用情况。结果:排除后,54,712例患者(平均年龄68.4岁,45.7%为女性)卒中后存活至少1年。在出院后的90天内,大多数人(92.8%)看了全科医生,而26.2%的人去了急诊室。出院后一年内,66.2%和61.4%的患者接受了低密度脂蛋白和糖化血红蛋白检测,39.6%的患者接受了流感疫苗接种。在65岁以上的人群中,85.5%的人开过降脂药,88.7%的人至少开过一种降压药。在糖尿病患者中,70.3%的人开了抗高血糖药物,而84.9%的房颤患者开了抗凝剂。结论:尽管有完善的最佳实践指南,二级卒中预防,特别是重要的实验室值,仍然不是最理想的。未来的研究应该探索更好的继发性卒中护理的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences is the official publication of the four member societies of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation -- Canadian Neurological Society (CNS), Canadian Association of Child Neurology (CACN), Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS), Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists (CSCN). The Journal is a widely circulated internationally recognized medical journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles. The Journal is published in January, March, May, July, September, and November in an online only format. The first Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (the Journal) was published in 1974 in Winnipeg. In 1981, the Journal became the official publication of the member societies of the CNSF.
期刊最新文献
Reviewer Comment on Hunt et al. "A Retrospective Evaluation of Ocrelizumab and Rituximab Discontinuation in a Real-World Patient Cohort". Diagnosing Hemi-Laryngopharyngeal Spasm: Avoiding Unnecessary Tracheostomies. Risk Factors and Antimicrobial Resistance in Secondary Intracranial Infections Following Viral Encephalitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Reviewer Comment on Buchel et al. "Geographic Differences in Healthcare Utilization Outcomes in Ischemic Stroke:A Population-Level Study from Manitoba". Reviewer Comment on Cooper et al. "Exploring the Value of Brain T2* Weighted and FLAIR Imaging for Diagnosing Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1