Demographic Characteristics Associated With Adolescent Receipt of Provider E-Cigarette Screening and Advice and the Impact on Harm Perception

AJPM focus Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.focus.2024.100309
John S. Acosta-Peñaloza MS, Karen W. Geletko MPH, Jon Mills PhD
{"title":"Demographic Characteristics Associated With Adolescent Receipt of Provider E-Cigarette Screening and Advice and the Impact on Harm Perception","authors":"John S. Acosta-Peñaloza MS,&nbsp;Karen W. Geletko MPH,&nbsp;Jon Mills PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2024.100309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The growing prevalence of E-cigarette use among adolescents is alarming because it increases the probability of persistent tobacco use and addiction to nicotine. Healthcare providers are in a unique position to influence their patients’ use of E-cigarettes. The purpose of the study is to determine the frequency at which providers screen adolescents for E-cigarette use and advise against use during healthcare visits. The study also examines associations between provider intervention and adolescent harm perception.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using data from the 2021 National Youth Tobacco Survey, the authors examined provider E-cigarette screening and advice to not use from 16,910 participants who self-reported receiving medical care within the preceding year. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess whether the odds of provider intervention varied by age, sex, and race/ethnicity and whether receiving provider intervention was associated with a likelihood for harm perception.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Provider intervention was more likely among those aged 13–18 years, who are male, and who are White and/or non-Hispanic (<em>p</em>&lt;0.001). The authors found no association between provider intervention and increased harm perception of E-cigarettes; however, provider intervention was associated with the belief that E-cigarettes are equally or more addictive than cigarettes (<em>p</em>&lt;0.0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Study findings emphasize the significance of addressing disparities in E-cigarette use and healthcare provider intervention among minority adolescents, underscoring the need for healthcare providers to be thorough in screening for E-cigarette use and providing appropriate cessation support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424001275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The growing prevalence of E-cigarette use among adolescents is alarming because it increases the probability of persistent tobacco use and addiction to nicotine. Healthcare providers are in a unique position to influence their patients’ use of E-cigarettes. The purpose of the study is to determine the frequency at which providers screen adolescents for E-cigarette use and advise against use during healthcare visits. The study also examines associations between provider intervention and adolescent harm perception.

Methods

Using data from the 2021 National Youth Tobacco Survey, the authors examined provider E-cigarette screening and advice to not use from 16,910 participants who self-reported receiving medical care within the preceding year. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess whether the odds of provider intervention varied by age, sex, and race/ethnicity and whether receiving provider intervention was associated with a likelihood for harm perception.

Results

Provider intervention was more likely among those aged 13–18 years, who are male, and who are White and/or non-Hispanic (p<0.001). The authors found no association between provider intervention and increased harm perception of E-cigarettes; however, provider intervention was associated with the belief that E-cigarettes are equally or more addictive than cigarettes (p<0.0001).

Conclusions

Study findings emphasize the significance of addressing disparities in E-cigarette use and healthcare provider intervention among minority adolescents, underscoring the need for healthcare providers to be thorough in screening for E-cigarette use and providing appropriate cessation support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年接受电子烟筛查和建议的人口学特征及其对危害认知的影响
电子烟在青少年中的日益流行令人担忧,因为它增加了持续使用烟草和对尼古丁成瘾的可能性。医疗保健提供者在影响患者使用电子烟方面处于独特的地位。该研究的目的是确定提供者筛查青少年使用电子烟的频率,并建议在就诊期间不要使用电子烟。该研究还调查了提供者干预与青少年伤害认知之间的关系。方法:使用2021年全国青少年烟草调查的数据,作者检查了16,910名自我报告在前一年接受过医疗护理的参与者的电子烟筛查和不使用建议。使用多变量逻辑回归模型来评估提供者干预的几率是否因年龄、性别和种族/民族而异,以及接受提供者干预是否与感知伤害的可能性有关。结果:提供者干预更有可能发生在13-18岁的男性、白人和/或非西班牙裔人群中。结论:研究结果强调了解决少数族裔青少年电子烟使用差异和医疗保健提供者干预的重要性,强调了医疗保健提供者对电子烟使用进行彻底筛查和提供适当戒烟支持的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJPM focus
AJPM focus Health, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Virtual Versus In-Person Delivery on Behavior Changes Among Adults Enrolled in the Diabetes Prevention Program in the Rio Grande Valley, Texas: A Secondary Analysis Afterschool Child Firearm Assaults: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Massachusetts’ Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Surveillance System, 2020–2022 Aggregated 50-State, Regional, and State-Level Trends in State and Local Government Health Employees in the U.S. From 2000 Through 2023 Decomposing the Association Between Neighborhood Homicide Rates and Stress-Related Health Outcomes Among Black Men in Chicago
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1