Patient Perspectives on Personalized Risk Communication Using Polygenic Risk Scores to Inform Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions

Shauna R. Goldberg MPH , Linda K. Ko PhD , Li Hsu PhD , Hang Yin MS , Charles Kooperberg PhD , Ulrike Peters PhD, MPH , Andrea N. Burnett-Hartman PhD, MPH
{"title":"Patient Perspectives on Personalized Risk Communication Using Polygenic Risk Scores to Inform Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions","authors":"Shauna R. Goldberg MPH ,&nbsp;Linda K. Ko PhD ,&nbsp;Li Hsu PhD ,&nbsp;Hang Yin MS ,&nbsp;Charles Kooperberg PhD ,&nbsp;Ulrike Peters PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Andrea N. Burnett-Hartman PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2024.100308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Colorectal cancer is increasingly diagnosed in people aged &lt;50 years. New U.S. guidelines recommend screening initiation at age 45 years. Providing personalized risk for colorectal cancer using polygenic risk scores may be an opportunity to engage this younger population in colorectal cancer screening. There is limited research on patient understanding of polygenic risk scores results and use of polygenic risk scores to inform colorectal cancer screening decisions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From May 2022 to June 2023, 20 Kaiser Permanente Colorado members aged 46–51 years who had been offered colorectal cancer screening but had never completed it signed consent to provide a saliva sample for colorectal cancer polygenic risk score analysis. After receiving personalized polygenic risk scores for colorectal cancer, participants completed a semistructured interview regarding the understanding of their polygenic risk scores, perceived colorectal cancer risk, and intention to screen. Thematic analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti, Version 8.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 19 participants who successfully completed polygenic risk score–related testing and a semistructured interview, 13 were female, 14 never smoked cigarettes, 6 were Hispanic, and 13 were non-Hispanic White. One participant had high risk for colorectal cancer on the basis of polygenic risk score results. Qualitative interviews showed participants’ understanding of their results, trust in polygenic risk scores, perception of risk for colorectal cancer, plans to complete colorectal cancer screening, intent to share polygenic risk scores with healthcare providers, and concerns about genetic results impacting health care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Qualitative analyses suggest that participants were interested in and understood their polygenic risk score results. Further study is needed to develop guidelines, effective calls to action, provider engagement, and health education materials on use of polygenic risk scores for health decision making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424001263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is increasingly diagnosed in people aged <50 years. New U.S. guidelines recommend screening initiation at age 45 years. Providing personalized risk for colorectal cancer using polygenic risk scores may be an opportunity to engage this younger population in colorectal cancer screening. There is limited research on patient understanding of polygenic risk scores results and use of polygenic risk scores to inform colorectal cancer screening decisions.

Methods

From May 2022 to June 2023, 20 Kaiser Permanente Colorado members aged 46–51 years who had been offered colorectal cancer screening but had never completed it signed consent to provide a saliva sample for colorectal cancer polygenic risk score analysis. After receiving personalized polygenic risk scores for colorectal cancer, participants completed a semistructured interview regarding the understanding of their polygenic risk scores, perceived colorectal cancer risk, and intention to screen. Thematic analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti, Version 8.

Results

Of the 19 participants who successfully completed polygenic risk score–related testing and a semistructured interview, 13 were female, 14 never smoked cigarettes, 6 were Hispanic, and 13 were non-Hispanic White. One participant had high risk for colorectal cancer on the basis of polygenic risk score results. Qualitative interviews showed participants’ understanding of their results, trust in polygenic risk scores, perception of risk for colorectal cancer, plans to complete colorectal cancer screening, intent to share polygenic risk scores with healthcare providers, and concerns about genetic results impacting health care.

Conclusions

Qualitative analyses suggest that participants were interested in and understood their polygenic risk score results. Further study is needed to develop guidelines, effective calls to action, provider engagement, and health education materials on use of polygenic risk scores for health decision making.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用多基因风险评分为结直肠癌筛查决策提供信息的患者对个性化风险沟通的看法
方法:从2022年5月到2023年6月,20名年龄在46-51岁之间、曾接受过结直肠癌筛查但从未完成筛查的Kaiser Permanente Colorado会员签署了同意提供唾液样本用于结直肠癌多基因风险评分分析的同意书。在接受个性化的结直肠癌多基因风险评分后,参与者完成了一项半结构化访谈,以了解他们的多基因风险评分、感知结直肠癌风险和筛查意愿。使用Atlas进行专题分析。版本8。结果:在成功完成多基因风险评分相关测试和半结构化访谈的19名参与者中,有13名女性,14名从不吸烟,6名西班牙裔,13名非西班牙裔白人。根据多基因风险评分结果,一名参与者患结直肠癌的风险很高。定性访谈显示参与者对结果的理解、对多基因风险评分的信任、对结直肠癌风险的认知、完成结直肠癌筛查的计划、与医疗保健提供者分享多基因风险评分的意图以及对遗传结果影响医疗保健的担忧。结论:定性分析表明,参与者对他们的多基因风险评分结果感兴趣并理解。需要进一步研究制定指南、有效的行动呼吁、提供者参与和健康教育材料,将多基因风险评分用于健康决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJPM focus
AJPM focus Health, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Virtual Versus In-Person Delivery on Behavior Changes Among Adults Enrolled in the Diabetes Prevention Program in the Rio Grande Valley, Texas: A Secondary Analysis. Editorial Board and Journal Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1