Patient Perspectives on Home Tonometer Usage for Glaucoma.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S501234
Pariyamon Thaprawat, Sarah P Dugan, Amy D Zhang
{"title":"Patient Perspectives on Home Tonometer Usage for Glaucoma.","authors":"Pariyamon Thaprawat, Sarah P Dugan, Amy D Zhang","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S501234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To understand patient experiences using the iCare HOME tonometer through assessing ease of use, device usage patterns, proficiency, and patient comments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective survey-based cohort study of 19 patients (35 eyes) with glaucoma or glaucoma suspect diagnoses. Patients received training on home tonometer usage and were loaned the device for one week to measure intraocular pressure at home multiple times daily. Participants completed a journal and survey at the end of the study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, participants measured intraocular pressure ≥4 times per eye each day (4.19±1.54 OD and 4.06±1.41 OS). Most found the home tonometer moderately or very easy to use (75% total, 31% and 44% respectively) and would be happy to use the device in the future (94%). The home tonometer was deemed comfortable to use (94%). Most participants were able to use the device without assistance from another person (88%). Many felt that they became proficient at using the home tonometer (94%) and proficiency was achieved typically by day 3 of usage. Patient comments provided insight into sources of difficulty in usage and motivations for home tonometry.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Home tonometry was easy to use and comfortable for most patients with proficiency in usage quickly achieved by day 3. Surveying patient perspectives revealed sources of difficulties in home tonometer usage. Patients were eager to obtain home intraocular pressure measurements that could help with disease management.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"199-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S501234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To understand patient experiences using the iCare HOME tonometer through assessing ease of use, device usage patterns, proficiency, and patient comments.

Methods: We conducted a prospective survey-based cohort study of 19 patients (35 eyes) with glaucoma or glaucoma suspect diagnoses. Patients received training on home tonometer usage and were loaned the device for one week to measure intraocular pressure at home multiple times daily. Participants completed a journal and survey at the end of the study period.

Results: On average, participants measured intraocular pressure ≥4 times per eye each day (4.19±1.54 OD and 4.06±1.41 OS). Most found the home tonometer moderately or very easy to use (75% total, 31% and 44% respectively) and would be happy to use the device in the future (94%). The home tonometer was deemed comfortable to use (94%). Most participants were able to use the device without assistance from another person (88%). Many felt that they became proficient at using the home tonometer (94%) and proficiency was achieved typically by day 3 of usage. Patient comments provided insight into sources of difficulty in usage and motivations for home tonometry.

Conclusion: Home tonometry was easy to use and comfortable for most patients with proficiency in usage quickly achieved by day 3. Surveying patient perspectives revealed sources of difficulties in home tonometer usage. Patients were eager to obtain home intraocular pressure measurements that could help with disease management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of IMO vifa24plus(1-2) and Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2. Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction of Two Continuous Range of Vision Intraocular Lenses. Application of the 2021 AAPOS Guidelines in Clinics with Revision and Validation of SPOT Referral Criteria. Clinical Evaluation of Faricimab in Real-World Diabetic Macular Edema in India- A Multicenter Observational Study. Propensity Score to Compare Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Scleral Buckling in Retrospective Studies [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1