Rising Rates of Urethral Bulking: A Retrospective Study of a National Database.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001655
Taylor Whitaker, Samantha DeAndrade, K Marie Douglass, Tajnoos Yazdany
{"title":"Rising Rates of Urethral Bulking: A Retrospective Study of a National Database.","authors":"Taylor Whitaker, Samantha DeAndrade, K Marie Douglass, Tajnoos Yazdany","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects approximately 50% of women. There are limited data regarding trends in management as treatment options have changed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze trends in the surgical management of SUI, including slings and urethral bulking, from 2012 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who had undergone a sling or urethral bulking procedure were identified by Current Procedural Terminology code. Descriptive statistics and independent paired t tests were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 81,657 patients received either slings or urethral bulking from 2012 to 2022. The number of slings performed peaked in 2017, decreased in 2020, and has subsequently increased. The rate of urethral bulking increased from 2019 to 2022. The average age patients who received urethral bulking was 64 years versus 56 years for sling patients (P < 0.05). These patients were more likely to be American Society of Anesthesiology class III compared to those receiving slings (39% vs 25%, respectively, P < 0.05). Readmission and reoperation rates were not statistically different. Less invasive procedures were more likely to be performed concurrently with bulking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sling placement is the most common surgical procedure for SUI but it decreased in 2020, likely due to COVID-19-related delays, and has not yet returned to prepandemic levels. Urethral bulking has become more common, possibly due to new agents available in U.S. markets. Patients who received urethral bulking were more likely to be older, have severe systemic disease, and underwent a less invasive concurrent procedure. Further research is needed to understand these trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects approximately 50% of women. There are limited data regarding trends in management as treatment options have changed.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze trends in the surgical management of SUI, including slings and urethral bulking, from 2012 to 2022.

Study design: Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who had undergone a sling or urethral bulking procedure were identified by Current Procedural Terminology code. Descriptive statistics and independent paired t tests were performed.

Results: A total of 81,657 patients received either slings or urethral bulking from 2012 to 2022. The number of slings performed peaked in 2017, decreased in 2020, and has subsequently increased. The rate of urethral bulking increased from 2019 to 2022. The average age patients who received urethral bulking was 64 years versus 56 years for sling patients (P < 0.05). These patients were more likely to be American Society of Anesthesiology class III compared to those receiving slings (39% vs 25%, respectively, P < 0.05). Readmission and reoperation rates were not statistically different. Less invasive procedures were more likely to be performed concurrently with bulking.

Conclusions: Sling placement is the most common surgical procedure for SUI but it decreased in 2020, likely due to COVID-19-related delays, and has not yet returned to prepandemic levels. Urethral bulking has become more common, possibly due to new agents available in U.S. markets. Patients who received urethral bulking were more likely to be older, have severe systemic disease, and underwent a less invasive concurrent procedure. Further research is needed to understand these trends.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重要性:压力性尿失禁(SUI)影响着约 50% 的女性。随着治疗方案的变化,有关治疗趋势的数据十分有限:本研究旨在分析从 2012 年到 2022 年 SUI 手术治疗的趋势,包括吊带和尿道膨出:研究设计:从美国外科学院国家外科质量改进计划数据库中,根据当前程序术语代码识别出接受过吊带术或尿道膨出术的患者。进行了描述性统计和独立配对 t 检验:从2012年到2022年,共有81657名患者接受了吊带术或尿道膨出术。接受吊带术的人数在2017年达到顶峰,2020年有所下降,随后有所上升。2019年至2022年,尿道膨出率有所上升。接受尿道膨出术的患者平均年龄为 64 岁,而接受吊带术的患者平均年龄为 56 岁(P < 0.05)。与接受吊带术的患者相比,这些患者更有可能是美国麻醉学会 III 级患者(分别为 39% 和 25%,P < 0.05)。再入院率和再手术率没有统计学差异。创伤较小的手术更有可能与膨宫术同时进行:结论:吊带置入术是治疗 SUI 最常见的手术方法,但 2020 年,可能由于 COVID-19 导致的延迟,吊带置入术的使用率有所下降,目前尚未恢复到流行前的水平。尿道膨出术变得更加常见,这可能是由于美国市场上出现了新的药剂。接受尿道扩张术的患者更有可能年龄较大、患有严重的全身性疾病,并且同时接受了创伤性较小的手术。要了解这些趋势,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adverse Events Associated With Female External Urinary Collection Devices. Tamsulosin to Prevent Urinary Retention After Vaginal Urogynecologic Surgery. The Effect of Concomitant Hysterectomy Route on Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Outcomes. Urogynecology Research Is Underrepresented in Top Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals. Treatment Crossover Following Advanced Therapy for Overactive Bladder Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1