Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan for the Randomized Trial of Sedative Choice for Intubation (RSI).

Stephanie C DeMasi, Brant Imhoff, Ariel A Lewis, Kevin P Seitz, Brian E Driver, Kevin W Gibbs, Adit A Ginde, Stacy A Trent, Derek W Russell, Amelia L Muhs, Matthew E Prekker, John P Gaillard, Daniel Resnick-Ault, L Jane Stewart, Micah R Whitson, Graham W W Van Schaik, Aaron E Robinson, Jessica A Palakshappa, Neil R Aggarwal, Jason C Brainard, David J Douin, Carolynn Lyle, Sheetal Gandotra, Aaron J Lacy, Kristen C Sherlin, Greta K Carlson, J Maycee Cain, Brianne Redman, Carrie Higgins, Cori Withers, Logan L Beach, Barbara Gould, Jasmine McIntosh, Bradley D Lloyd, Tiffany L Israel, Li Wang, Todd W Rice, Wesley H Self, Jin H Han, Jonathan D Casey, Matthew W Semler
{"title":"Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan for the Randomized Trial of Sedative Choice for Intubation (RSI).","authors":"Stephanie C DeMasi, Brant Imhoff, Ariel A Lewis, Kevin P Seitz, Brian E Driver, Kevin W Gibbs, Adit A Ginde, Stacy A Trent, Derek W Russell, Amelia L Muhs, Matthew E Prekker, John P Gaillard, Daniel Resnick-Ault, L Jane Stewart, Micah R Whitson, Graham W W Van Schaik, Aaron E Robinson, Jessica A Palakshappa, Neil R Aggarwal, Jason C Brainard, David J Douin, Carolynn Lyle, Sheetal Gandotra, Aaron J Lacy, Kristen C Sherlin, Greta K Carlson, J Maycee Cain, Brianne Redman, Carrie Higgins, Cori Withers, Logan L Beach, Barbara Gould, Jasmine McIntosh, Bradley D Lloyd, Tiffany L Israel, Li Wang, Todd W Rice, Wesley H Self, Jin H Han, Jonathan D Casey, Matthew W Semler","doi":"10.1101/2025.01.18.25320768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency tracheal intubation is a common and high-risk procedure. Ketamine and etomidate are sedative medicines commonly used to induce anesthesia for emergency tracheal intubation, but whether the induction medication used affects patient outcomes is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does the use of ketamine for induction of anesthesia decrease the incidence of death among adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation, compared to the use of etomidate?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>The Randomized trial of Sedative choice for Intubation (RSI) is a pragmatic, multicenter, unblinded, parallel-group, randomized trial being conducted in 14 sites (6 emergency departments and 8 intensive care units) in the United States. The trial compares ketamine vs etomidate for induction of anesthesia among 2,364 critically ill adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation. The primary outcome is all-cause, 28-day in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome is the incidence of cardiovascular collapse during intubation, a composite of hypotension, receipt of vasopressors, and cardiac arrest. Enrollment began on April 6, 2022, and is expected to conclude in 2025.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The RSI trial will provide important data on the effects of ketamine vs etomidate on death and other outcomes for critically ill adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation. Specifying the protocol and statistical analysis plan before the conclusion of enrollment increases the rigor, reproducibility, and interpretability of the trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registry: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ; No.: NCT05277896 ; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.</p><p><strong>Take-home points: </strong><b>Study Question:</b> Does use of ketamine for induction of anesthesia during emergency tracheal intubation decrease the incidence of death, compared with use of etomidate?<b>Results:</b> This manuscript describes the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Randomized trial of Sedative choice for Intubation (RSI) comparing ketamine vs etomidate for induction of anesthesia for emergency tracheal intubation.<b>Interpretation:</b> Prespecifying the full statistical analysis plan before completion of enrollment increases rigor, reproducibility, and transparency of the trial results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.18.25320768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency tracheal intubation is a common and high-risk procedure. Ketamine and etomidate are sedative medicines commonly used to induce anesthesia for emergency tracheal intubation, but whether the induction medication used affects patient outcomes is uncertain.

Research question: Does the use of ketamine for induction of anesthesia decrease the incidence of death among adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation, compared to the use of etomidate?

Study design and methods: The Randomized trial of Sedative choice for Intubation (RSI) is a pragmatic, multicenter, unblinded, parallel-group, randomized trial being conducted in 14 sites (6 emergency departments and 8 intensive care units) in the United States. The trial compares ketamine vs etomidate for induction of anesthesia among 2,364 critically ill adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation. The primary outcome is all-cause, 28-day in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome is the incidence of cardiovascular collapse during intubation, a composite of hypotension, receipt of vasopressors, and cardiac arrest. Enrollment began on April 6, 2022, and is expected to conclude in 2025.

Interpretation: The RSI trial will provide important data on the effects of ketamine vs etomidate on death and other outcomes for critically ill adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation. Specifying the protocol and statistical analysis plan before the conclusion of enrollment increases the rigor, reproducibility, and interpretability of the trial.

Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov ; No.: NCT05277896 ; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Take-home points: Study Question: Does use of ketamine for induction of anesthesia during emergency tracheal intubation decrease the incidence of death, compared with use of etomidate?Results: This manuscript describes the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Randomized trial of Sedative choice for Intubation (RSI) comparing ketamine vs etomidate for induction of anesthesia for emergency tracheal intubation.Interpretation: Prespecifying the full statistical analysis plan before completion of enrollment increases rigor, reproducibility, and transparency of the trial results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
插管镇静剂选择随机试验 (RSI) 的方案和统计分析计划。
背景:紧急气管插管是一种常见且高风险的手术。氯胺酮和依托咪酯是常用的用于紧急气管插管诱导麻醉的镇静药物,但所使用的诱导药物是否会影响患者的预后尚不确定。研究问题:与使用依托咪酯相比,使用氯胺酮诱导麻醉是否能降低急诊气管插管成人的死亡率?研究设计和方法:插管镇静选择随机试验(RSI)是一项实用、多中心、非盲、平行组、随机试验,在美国14个地点(6个急诊科和8个重症监护病房)进行。该试验比较了氯胺酮和依托咪酯在2364名接受紧急气管插管的危重成人中诱导麻醉的效果。主要结果是全因住院28天死亡率。次要结局是插管期间心血管衰竭的发生率、低血压、接受血管加压药物和心脏骤停的复合。招生于2022年4月6日开始,预计将于2025年结束。解释:RSI试验将提供氯胺酮与依托咪酯对急诊气管插管危重成人死亡和其他结局影响的重要数据。在入组结束前明确方案和统计分析计划可提高试验的严谨性、可重复性和可解释性。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov;否。: nct05277896;网址:www.clinicaltrials.gov.Take-home要点:研究问题:与使用依托咪酯相比,在紧急气管插管中使用氯胺酮诱导麻醉是否能降低死亡率?结果:本文描述了比较氯胺酮和依托咪酯在紧急气管插管诱导麻醉中的镇静选择随机试验(RSI)的方案和统计分析计划。解释:在完成入组前预先指定完整的统计分析计划,增加了试验结果的严谨性、可重复性和透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prompting is All You Need: How to Make LLMs More Helpful for Clinical Decision Support. Multi-tissue transcriptome-wide association study identifies 29 risk genes associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Automated epilepsy and seizure type phenotyping with pre-trained language models. AI-Detected Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Incident Ischemic Stroke and Cardiovascular Events: A UK Biobank Study. Randomized Trial Protocol: Epic Generative AI Chart Summarization Tool to Reduce Ambulatory Provider Cognitive Task Load.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1