Physical therapists' perceptions of telerehabilitation for patients with musculoskeletal conditions in a post-pandemic world.

Kevin McLaughlin, Kate I Minick, Julie M Fritz, Nicole Tannahill, Anne Spar, Marissa Feinsilver, Matthew Weber, Erika Opoku, Jeff Adams, Richard L Skolasky
{"title":"Physical therapists' perceptions of telerehabilitation for patients with musculoskeletal conditions in a post-pandemic world.","authors":"Kevin McLaughlin, Kate I Minick, Julie M Fritz, Nicole Tannahill, Anne Spar, Marissa Feinsilver, Matthew Weber, Erika Opoku, Jeff Adams, Richard L Skolasky","doi":"10.1101/2025.01.17.25320739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine physical therapists' experience providing telerehabilitation and their perceptions of telerehabilitation for patients with musculoskeletal conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survey of members of the Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 208 completed responses to our survey invitation. Most physical therapists responding to our survey reported using little to no telerehabilitation prior to the pandemic but increased use during the pandemic, followed by decreased use of telerehabilitation after the pandemic. Respondents reported using telerehabilitation slightly more after the pandemic than beforehand. Physical therapists reported that they believed they could deliver effective care using telerehabilitation but that it was not as effective as in-clinic care and they would prefer to use telerehabilitation as part of a hybrid care model versus using only telerehabilitation. Physical therapists suggested that certain patients were more likely than others to benefit from telerehabilitation and identified specific factors (e.g., patient preference, self-efficacy, postoperative status) that influenced whom they would consider to be most appropriate for telerehabilitation. \"Patient issues with technology\" was identified as the most common barrier to telerehabilitation use. Most physical therapists reported that they planned to use telerehabilitation in the future and agreed that telerehabilitation plays an important role in expanding access to physical therapy in the United States.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physical therapists believed that telerehabilitation continues to play an important role in a post-pandemic world. Although physical therapists reported that they considered telerehabilitation to be an effective method for delivering care, they did not consider it to be a replacement for in-clinic care and believed that certain patients are more likely than others to benefit from this approach.</p><p><strong>Impact statement: </strong>Physical therapists consider telerehabilitation to be a viable care option for patients with musculoskeletal pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.17.25320739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine physical therapists' experience providing telerehabilitation and their perceptions of telerehabilitation for patients with musculoskeletal conditions.

Methods: Survey of members of the Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy.

Results: We received 208 completed responses to our survey invitation. Most physical therapists responding to our survey reported using little to no telerehabilitation prior to the pandemic but increased use during the pandemic, followed by decreased use of telerehabilitation after the pandemic. Respondents reported using telerehabilitation slightly more after the pandemic than beforehand. Physical therapists reported that they believed they could deliver effective care using telerehabilitation but that it was not as effective as in-clinic care and they would prefer to use telerehabilitation as part of a hybrid care model versus using only telerehabilitation. Physical therapists suggested that certain patients were more likely than others to benefit from telerehabilitation and identified specific factors (e.g., patient preference, self-efficacy, postoperative status) that influenced whom they would consider to be most appropriate for telerehabilitation. "Patient issues with technology" was identified as the most common barrier to telerehabilitation use. Most physical therapists reported that they planned to use telerehabilitation in the future and agreed that telerehabilitation plays an important role in expanding access to physical therapy in the United States.

Conclusions: Physical therapists believed that telerehabilitation continues to play an important role in a post-pandemic world. Although physical therapists reported that they considered telerehabilitation to be an effective method for delivering care, they did not consider it to be a replacement for in-clinic care and believed that certain patients are more likely than others to benefit from this approach.

Impact statement: Physical therapists consider telerehabilitation to be a viable care option for patients with musculoskeletal pain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物理治疗师对大流行后世界肌肉骨骼疾病患者远程康复的看法。
目的:探讨物理治疗师为肌肉骨骼疾病患者提供远程康复的经验和他们对远程康复的看法。方法:对骨科物理治疗学会会员进行调查。结果:我们收到了208份调查邀请的完整回复。对我们的调查做出回应的大多数物理治疗师报告说,在大流行之前,他们很少或根本没有使用远程康复,但在大流行期间增加了使用,随后在大流行之后减少了远程康复的使用。受访者报告说,大流行后使用远程康复的人数略高于疫情前。物理治疗师报告说,他们相信他们可以使用远程康复提供有效的护理,但它不如临床护理有效,他们更愿意使用远程康复作为混合护理模式的一部分,而不是只使用远程康复。物理治疗师认为,某些患者比其他患者更有可能从远程康复中受益,并确定了影响他们认为谁最适合远程康复的具体因素(例如,患者偏好、自我效能、术后状态)。“患者对技术的问题”被确定为远程康复使用的最常见障碍。大多数物理治疗师报告说,他们计划在未来使用远程康复,并同意远程康复在扩大美国物理治疗的可及性方面发挥着重要作用。结论:物理治疗师认为,远程康复在大流行后的世界中继续发挥重要作用。尽管物理治疗师报告说,他们认为远程康复是提供护理的一种有效方法,但他们不认为它可以取代门诊护理,并认为某些患者比其他人更有可能从这种方法中受益。影响陈述:物理治疗师认为远程康复是肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的一种可行的护理选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prompting is All You Need: How to Make LLMs More Helpful for Clinical Decision Support. Multi-tissue transcriptome-wide association study identifies 29 risk genes associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Automated epilepsy and seizure type phenotyping with pre-trained language models. AI-Detected Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Incident Ischemic Stroke and Cardiovascular Events: A UK Biobank Study. Randomized Trial Protocol: Epic Generative AI Chart Summarization Tool to Reduce Ambulatory Provider Cognitive Task Load.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1