The welfare impact of climate action: A distributional analysis for Italy

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108181
Valeria Costantini , Chiara Martini , Benedetta Mina , Mariangela Zoli
{"title":"The welfare impact of climate action: A distributional analysis for Italy","authors":"Valeria Costantini ,&nbsp;Chiara Martini ,&nbsp;Benedetta Mina ,&nbsp;Mariangela Zoli","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving the climate targets the European Union sets requires a complex policy mix, which is expected to cause a general increase in end-user prices, especially for carbon-intensive goods. For those countries already affected by large inequalities, this constitutes a risk of further negative impacts in distributional terms. This paper contributes to the debate by assessing the distributional impacts on Italian households of a policy mix coherent with the EU climate targets. The policy instruments considered are the removal of fossil fuels subsidies and carbon taxation. The analysis is carried out by soft-linking a dynamic CGE model with a microsimulation model at the household level. The estimation of a consumer demand system includes direct, indirect, and demand-side effects of the policy scenario. We then complement the analysis on the uses-side by simulating the impacts on the sources-side, computing the burden imposed on households by changes in the returns to production factors. The overall impacts of the climate policy lead to a welfare loss for households at all levels of the expenditure distribution. However, we find that both the uses and sources-side impacts of the policy are progressive, and the sources-side effects strongly reinforce the uses-side ones. Finally, we show that reinvesting revenues in clean energy technologies is key to improving the progressivity of climate policies in Italy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 108181"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325000040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving the climate targets the European Union sets requires a complex policy mix, which is expected to cause a general increase in end-user prices, especially for carbon-intensive goods. For those countries already affected by large inequalities, this constitutes a risk of further negative impacts in distributional terms. This paper contributes to the debate by assessing the distributional impacts on Italian households of a policy mix coherent with the EU climate targets. The policy instruments considered are the removal of fossil fuels subsidies and carbon taxation. The analysis is carried out by soft-linking a dynamic CGE model with a microsimulation model at the household level. The estimation of a consumer demand system includes direct, indirect, and demand-side effects of the policy scenario. We then complement the analysis on the uses-side by simulating the impacts on the sources-side, computing the burden imposed on households by changes in the returns to production factors. The overall impacts of the climate policy lead to a welfare loss for households at all levels of the expenditure distribution. However, we find that both the uses and sources-side impacts of the policy are progressive, and the sources-side effects strongly reinforce the uses-side ones. Finally, we show that reinvesting revenues in clean energy technologies is key to improving the progressivity of climate policies in Italy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气候行动对福利的影响:意大利的分布分析
实现欧盟设定的气候目标需要复杂的政策组合,预计这将导致终端用户价格普遍上涨,尤其是碳密集型商品。对于那些已经受到严重不平等影响的国家来说,这构成了在分配方面进一步产生负面影响的风险。本文通过评估与欧盟气候目标相一致的政策组合对意大利家庭的分配影响,为辩论做出了贡献。考虑的政策工具是取消化石燃料补贴和碳税。分析是通过软链接的动态CGE模型和微观模拟模型在家庭层面上进行的。消费者需求系统的估计包括政策情景的直接、间接和需求侧影响。然后,我们通过模拟对源端的影响来补充对用户端的分析,计算生产要素回报变化给家庭带来的负担。气候政策的总体影响导致了各级支出分配家庭的福利损失。然而,我们发现政策的使用侧和源侧影响都是渐进的,并且源侧效应强烈地强化了使用侧效应。最后,我们表明,将收入再投资于清洁能源技术是提高意大利气候政策累进性的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
How electric load responds to temperature and weather variables in Texas Do gasoline price expectations affect household readiness to spend at the ZLB? Evidence from Michigan survey data Welfare effects, carbon abatement costs, and market impacts of EV subsidies in Norway Policy uncertainty and electric utility investments The ‘climate Kuznets curve’: A critique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1