Identifying care gaps and referral patterns in acute dermatology at urgent care centers

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Archives of Dermatological Research Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1007/s00403-024-03662-1
S. Minhaj Rahman, Amanda Rodriguez Orengo, Acacia Bowden, Clayton B. Green, Alice P. Pentland, Christopher T. Richardson, Anna De Benedetto, Molly Plovanich, Julie Ryan Wolf
{"title":"Identifying care gaps and referral patterns in acute dermatology at urgent care centers","authors":"S. Minhaj Rahman,&nbsp;Amanda Rodriguez Orengo,&nbsp;Acacia Bowden,&nbsp;Clayton B. Green,&nbsp;Alice P. Pentland,&nbsp;Christopher T. Richardson,&nbsp;Anna De Benedetto,&nbsp;Molly Plovanich,&nbsp;Julie Ryan Wolf","doi":"10.1007/s00403-024-03662-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Limited urgent access to board-certified dermatologists drives patients to seek dermatologic care at urgent care centers (UCC). UCC are staffed by clinicians with comparatively limited dermatology training, often resulting in lower quality care for acute dermatology conditions. Using a retrospective cohort of 839 referrals, this study investigates health care referral outcomes for patients seeking dermatologic care at UCC. We further surveyed five dermatologists on the appropriateness of UCC referral and UCC treatment plans in a subset of 40 referrals, as well as the feasibility of referral management by dermatology e-consultation (eConsult). Most patients referred by UCC did not complete an in-person dermatology evaluation (56.5%). Of those that completed an in-person dermatology evaluation, only 29.1% of UCC diagnoses were concordant. While our surveyed dermatologists (≥3/5 consensus) determined only 20% of UCC referrals had appropriate treatment plans, they found most referrals (92.5%) could have been managed with an eConsult with only 5.0% requiring an urgent in-person dermatology evaluation. These data reveal several practice gaps in dermatological care delivery in UCC and inefficiencies in the urgent referral process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-024-03662-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limited urgent access to board-certified dermatologists drives patients to seek dermatologic care at urgent care centers (UCC). UCC are staffed by clinicians with comparatively limited dermatology training, often resulting in lower quality care for acute dermatology conditions. Using a retrospective cohort of 839 referrals, this study investigates health care referral outcomes for patients seeking dermatologic care at UCC. We further surveyed five dermatologists on the appropriateness of UCC referral and UCC treatment plans in a subset of 40 referrals, as well as the feasibility of referral management by dermatology e-consultation (eConsult). Most patients referred by UCC did not complete an in-person dermatology evaluation (56.5%). Of those that completed an in-person dermatology evaluation, only 29.1% of UCC diagnoses were concordant. While our surveyed dermatologists (≥3/5 consensus) determined only 20% of UCC referrals had appropriate treatment plans, they found most referrals (92.5%) could have been managed with an eConsult with only 5.0% requiring an urgent in-person dermatology evaluation. These data reveal several practice gaps in dermatological care delivery in UCC and inefficiencies in the urgent referral process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别护理差距和转诊模式在急症护理中心的急性皮肤病。
有限的紧急访问委员会认证的皮肤科医生驱动患者寻求皮肤科护理在紧急护理中心(UCC)。UCC的工作人员是由相对有限的皮肤科培训的临床医生,往往导致较低质量的护理急性皮肤病。采用839例转诊患者的回顾性队列,本研究调查了在UCC寻求皮肤科治疗的患者转诊结果。我们进一步调查了5名皮肤科医生在40个转诊的子集中对UCC转诊和UCC治疗计划的适当性,以及通过皮肤科电子会诊进行转诊管理的可行性。大多数UCC转诊的患者(56.5%)没有完成亲自皮肤科评估。在完成亲自皮肤科评估的患者中,只有29.1%的UCC诊断是一致的。虽然我们调查的皮肤科医生(≥3/5的共识)确定只有20%的UCC转诊患者有适当的治疗计划,但他们发现大多数(92.5%)的转诊患者本可以通过eConsult进行管理,只有5.0%的转诊患者需要紧急的当面皮肤科评估。这些数据揭示了UCC皮肤科护理交付的几个实践差距和紧急转诊过程中的效率低下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Prospective evaluation of a 675-nm laser for facial rejuvenation in Fitzpatrick skin types III–V Improving emergency medicine resident confidence in diagnosing and managing hidradenitis suppurativa through educational intervention: a multicenter study Subtle presentation of cutaneous metastasis in a renal cell carcinoma patient Attitudes and expectations revisited: a six-month follow-up of patient outcomes after patch testing Oral isotretinoin combined with antihistaminics for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis with GRADE assessment of randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1