Disentangling effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and Black Lives Matter protests on implicit anti-Black bias

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-26 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104746
C. Donnan Gravelle , Patricia J. Brooks , Jeremy E. Sawyer
{"title":"Disentangling effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and Black Lives Matter protests on implicit anti-Black bias","authors":"C. Donnan Gravelle ,&nbsp;Patricia J. Brooks ,&nbsp;Jeremy E. Sawyer","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Terror Management Theory (TMT) holds that mortal threats bolster people's desire to support their worldviews, which may contribute to increased outgroup bias. In 2020, two events likely increased mortality salience and death anxiety: COVID-19 and the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests that followed George Floyd's murder. We used Project Implicit data to investigate their impact on implicit anti-Black bias, controlling for demographic variables. Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 82,639) found a decrease in anti-Black bias from April 1–May 20, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019, indicating that increased mortality salience amid the pandemic failed to increase anti-Black bias. Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 96,957) examined anti-Black bias and death anxiety across two seven-week periods prior to (April 1–May 20, 2020) and during the BLM protests (May 27–July 15, 2020). Death anxiety increased during the protests, while anti-Black bias decreased. Conservatives showed no link between death anxiety and anti-Black bias, yet showed a decrease in bias once the protests began. Liberals showed the TMT-predicted relation between death anxiety and increased bias, however this relation weakened during the protests. Notably, these attitude changes in the context of a mass social movement differ from predominant conservative shift and worldview defense patterns in prior work on attitude change amid social crisis. Collectively, our results failed to link mortality salience with outgroup bias but suggest a role for other factors including social movements, intergroup empathy, and social solidarity in reducing bias.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 104746"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825000599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Terror Management Theory (TMT) holds that mortal threats bolster people's desire to support their worldviews, which may contribute to increased outgroup bias. In 2020, two events likely increased mortality salience and death anxiety: COVID-19 and the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests that followed George Floyd's murder. We used Project Implicit data to investigate their impact on implicit anti-Black bias, controlling for demographic variables. Study 1 (N = 82,639) found a decrease in anti-Black bias from April 1–May 20, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019, indicating that increased mortality salience amid the pandemic failed to increase anti-Black bias. Study 2 (N = 96,957) examined anti-Black bias and death anxiety across two seven-week periods prior to (April 1–May 20, 2020) and during the BLM protests (May 27–July 15, 2020). Death anxiety increased during the protests, while anti-Black bias decreased. Conservatives showed no link between death anxiety and anti-Black bias, yet showed a decrease in bias once the protests began. Liberals showed the TMT-predicted relation between death anxiety and increased bias, however this relation weakened during the protests. Notably, these attitude changes in the context of a mass social movement differ from predominant conservative shift and worldview defense patterns in prior work on attitude change amid social crisis. Collectively, our results failed to link mortality salience with outgroup bias but suggest a role for other factors including social movements, intergroup empathy, and social solidarity in reducing bias.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行和“黑人的命也重要”抗议活动对隐性反黑人偏见的影响。
恐怖管理理论(TMT)认为,致命的威胁增强了人们支持自己世界观的愿望,这可能会导致外群体偏见的增加。2020年,两件事可能会增加死亡率和死亡焦虑:2019冠状病毒病和乔治·弗洛伊德被谋杀后的“黑人的命也重要”抗议活动。我们使用隐式项目数据来调查它们对内隐反黑人偏见的影响,控制人口变量。研究1 (N = 82639)发现,与2019年同期相比,2020年4月1日至5月20日期间,反黑人偏见有所减少,这表明大流行期间死亡率的上升并未增加反黑人偏见。研究2 (N = 96,957)在BLM抗议活动之前(2020年4月1日至5月20日)和期间(2020年5月27日至7月15日)的两个七周期间检查了反黑人偏见和死亡焦虑。在抗议期间,死亡焦虑增加,而反黑人偏见减少。保守派没有显示出死亡焦虑和反黑人偏见之间的联系,但在抗议活动开始后,他们的偏见有所减少。自由主义者显示了tmt预测的死亡焦虑和偏见增加之间的关系,然而这种关系在抗议期间减弱了。值得注意的是,这些在大规模社会运动背景下的态度变化,不同于以往研究社会危机中态度变化的主流保守转变和世界观防御模式。总的来说,我们的结果未能将死亡率显著性与外群体偏见联系起来,但表明其他因素,包括社会运动、群体间同理心和社会团结,在减少偏见方面发挥了作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
期刊最新文献
The influence of e-commerce virtual streamer characteristics on consumers' purchase intention: Based on a hybrid SEM-ANN approach Attentional strategies and ancillary gestures in resisting unintentional synchronization during joint action Transitions of School-Family-Community assets profiles and their associations with adolescent positive development and adjustment Doing well by doing good: The role of entrepreneurial mindfulness, social capital, and moral obligation in social entrepreneurial intentions Associations of work- and personal-life-related techno-stressors with emotional exhaustion, sickness absenteeism, and turnover intentions in public administration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1