Facilitators and barriers in the implementation of patient-centred care interventions among general practitioners: a systematic review protocol.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Research Policy and Systems Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1186/s12961-024-01277-6
Wenhui Li, Min Su, Zhengrong Li, Xiaojing Fan
{"title":"Facilitators and barriers in the implementation of patient-centred care interventions among general practitioners: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Wenhui Li, Min Su, Zhengrong Li, Xiaojing Fan","doi":"10.1186/s12961-024-01277-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Challenges in the patient-provider relationship are prevalent, underscoring the importance of patient-centred care, which is respectful and responsive to patients' needs. General practitioners (GPs), also known as family doctors, serve as gatekeepers in primary care and are well positioned to deliver this type of care. However, effectively implementing patient-centred care remains a challenge. While behaviour change interventions have been developed to enhance patient-centred care in general practices, a comprehensive understanding of the facilitators and barriers to their implementation is lacking. This review aims to examine contextual factors of implementing interventions for patient-centred care by GPs. Implementation research analyses all aspects of application, including factors influencing it, processes involved and outcomes achieved within different contexts. The review will use the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0) to analyse influential factors and the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) to define interventions to promote behaviour change in patient-centred care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic literature review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search of five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) will be conducted to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing interventions in promoting patient-centred care by GPs. The CFIR 2.0 framework will guide the categorization and synthesis of barriers and facilitators, while the BCW will be employed to define the interventions. Two independent reviewers will conduct study screening, data extraction, quality appraisal and data analysis. Any disagreements between the reviewers will be resolved through the involvement of additional reviewers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This protocol outlines a systematic review utilizing an updated framework-based approach to identify and synthesize evidence on barriers and facilitators to implementing behaviour change interventions by GPs. The findings will provide insights into the effectiveness of these interventions in enhancing patient-centred care and will inform future research and clinical practice. This review will identify gaps and challenges in existing studies and propose strategies for the effective implementation of behavior change interventions among GPs. Additionally, it will inform clinical practice by refining behaviour change interventions to enhance the delivery of patient-centred care by GPs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO: CRD42023485014.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01277-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Challenges in the patient-provider relationship are prevalent, underscoring the importance of patient-centred care, which is respectful and responsive to patients' needs. General practitioners (GPs), also known as family doctors, serve as gatekeepers in primary care and are well positioned to deliver this type of care. However, effectively implementing patient-centred care remains a challenge. While behaviour change interventions have been developed to enhance patient-centred care in general practices, a comprehensive understanding of the facilitators and barriers to their implementation is lacking. This review aims to examine contextual factors of implementing interventions for patient-centred care by GPs. Implementation research analyses all aspects of application, including factors influencing it, processes involved and outcomes achieved within different contexts. The review will use the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0) to analyse influential factors and the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) to define interventions to promote behaviour change in patient-centred care.

Methods: This systematic literature review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search of five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) will be conducted to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing interventions in promoting patient-centred care by GPs. The CFIR 2.0 framework will guide the categorization and synthesis of barriers and facilitators, while the BCW will be employed to define the interventions. Two independent reviewers will conduct study screening, data extraction, quality appraisal and data analysis. Any disagreements between the reviewers will be resolved through the involvement of additional reviewers.

Discussion: This protocol outlines a systematic review utilizing an updated framework-based approach to identify and synthesize evidence on barriers and facilitators to implementing behaviour change interventions by GPs. The findings will provide insights into the effectiveness of these interventions in enhancing patient-centred care and will inform future research and clinical practice. This review will identify gaps and challenges in existing studies and propose strategies for the effective implementation of behavior change interventions among GPs. Additionally, it will inform clinical practice by refining behaviour change interventions to enhance the delivery of patient-centred care by GPs.

Trial registration: PROSPERO: CRD42023485014.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全科医生实施以患者为中心的护理干预措施的促进因素和障碍:一项系统审查方案。
背景:在病人-提供者关系的挑战是普遍存在的,强调以病人为中心的护理,这是尊重和响应病人的需要的重要性。全科医生(gp),也被称为家庭医生,作为初级保健的看门人,在提供这类护理方面处于有利地位。然而,有效地实施以病人为中心的护理仍然是一个挑战。虽然已经制定了行为改变干预措施,以加强一般做法中以患者为中心的护理,但对其实施的促进因素和障碍缺乏全面的了解。本综述的目的是检查实施干预的背景因素,以病人为中心的护理由全科医生。实施研究分析应用的所有方面,包括影响应用的因素、涉及的过程和在不同情况下取得的成果。该审查将使用更新的实施研究综合框架(CFIR 2.0)来分析影响因素,并使用行为改变轮(BCW)来确定干预措施,以促进以患者为中心的护理中的行为改变。方法:本系统文献综述将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。将对五个数据库(Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library和Web of Science)进行全面搜索,以确定实施干预措施以促进全科医生以患者为中心的护理的障碍和促进因素。CFIR 2.0框架将指导障碍和促进因素的分类和综合,而BCW将用于定义干预措施。两名独立审稿人将进行研究筛选、数据提取、质量评估和数据分析。审稿人之间的任何分歧将通过其他审稿人的参与来解决。讨论:本协议概述了一项系统审查,利用更新的基于框架的方法来识别和综合关于全科医生实施行为改变干预的障碍和促进因素的证据。研究结果将为这些干预措施在加强以患者为中心的护理方面的有效性提供见解,并将为未来的研究和临床实践提供信息。本综述将确定现有研究中的差距和挑战,并提出在全科医生中有效实施行为改变干预措施的策略。此外,它将通过改进行为改变干预措施来提高全科医生以患者为中心的护理服务,从而为临床实践提供信息。试验注册:PROSPERO: CRD42023485014。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
期刊最新文献
Embedding research in practice: enablers, challenges and pathways to sustainability for embedded health researchers in Canada. Multimorbidity: a core priority for learning health systems amidst vertical disease programme cuts. Impact assessment of a national research collaboration improving health outcomes for working-age Australians with disability. Facilitators and challenges to implementing a researcher-in-residence model to build research capacity in adult social care. The Learning Cycle method: an approach to rapidly bring evidence to the point of decision-making for health system planning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1