Analysis of artery injury types and clinical characteristics of patients with transcatheter angioembolization after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1429821
Xianghu Meng, Rong Cong, Yibo Hua, Zengjun Wang, Ninghong Song, Wei Yang, Rijin Song
{"title":"Analysis of artery injury types and clinical characteristics of patients with transcatheter angioembolization after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.","authors":"Xianghu Meng, Rong Cong, Yibo Hua, Zengjun Wang, Ninghong Song, Wei Yang, Rijin Song","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1429821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no systematic classification of renal vascular injuries conducted for severe post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) bleeding.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the present study was to explore the various types of artery injury and clinical characteristics of patients who underwent transcatheter angioembolization (TAE) after PCNL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 52 patients who underwent renal arteriography (RA) because of severe bleeding after PCNL between April 2009 and December 2023. Among the patients, 38 underwent TAE due to positive RA results. Clinical data on the TAE patients, such as gender, age, body mass index, TAE interval, hemoglobin (Hb) decrease, operation time, stone size, the number and size of tracts, and clinical bleeding type, were summarized. The types of artery injury in TAE patients and their relationships with clinical characteristics were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Retrospective analysis revealed that, among the 38 TAE patients (32 males and 6 females), the mean TAE interval, average Hb decrease, mean tract number, and mean tract size reached 5.00 (6.25) days, 44.50 (24.50) g/L, 1 (0.25), and F20(6), respectively. Among the TAE patients, four kinds of vascular injury were observed, namely, 18 cases of pseudoaneurysm (PA), 12 cases of arteriocaliceal fistula (ACF), 7 cases of arteriovenous fistula (AVF), and 1 case of arterioperirenal fistula (APF). Analysis of the clinical characteristics of the three types of vascular injury (PA, ACF, and AVF) revealed that the number of tracts was the only factor that differed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RA results indicate that the types of postoperative renal artery injury mainly include PA, ACF, AVF, and APF, and the number of tracts may be related to the type of vascular injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1429821"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1429821","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is no systematic classification of renal vascular injuries conducted for severe post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) bleeding.

Aim: The aim of the present study was to explore the various types of artery injury and clinical characteristics of patients who underwent transcatheter angioembolization (TAE) after PCNL.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 52 patients who underwent renal arteriography (RA) because of severe bleeding after PCNL between April 2009 and December 2023. Among the patients, 38 underwent TAE due to positive RA results. Clinical data on the TAE patients, such as gender, age, body mass index, TAE interval, hemoglobin (Hb) decrease, operation time, stone size, the number and size of tracts, and clinical bleeding type, were summarized. The types of artery injury in TAE patients and their relationships with clinical characteristics were analyzed.

Results: Retrospective analysis revealed that, among the 38 TAE patients (32 males and 6 females), the mean TAE interval, average Hb decrease, mean tract number, and mean tract size reached 5.00 (6.25) days, 44.50 (24.50) g/L, 1 (0.25), and F20(6), respectively. Among the TAE patients, four kinds of vascular injury were observed, namely, 18 cases of pseudoaneurysm (PA), 12 cases of arteriocaliceal fistula (ACF), 7 cases of arteriovenous fistula (AVF), and 1 case of arterioperirenal fistula (APF). Analysis of the clinical characteristics of the three types of vascular injury (PA, ACF, and AVF) revealed that the number of tracts was the only factor that differed.

Conclusion: The RA results indicate that the types of postoperative renal artery injury mainly include PA, ACF, AVF, and APF, and the number of tracts may be related to the type of vascular injury.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮肾镜取石术后经导管血管栓塞患者动脉损伤类型及临床特点分析。
背景:对于经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)后严重出血的肾血管损伤,目前尚无系统的分类。目的:本研究旨在探讨PCNL术后行经导管血管栓塞术(transcatheter angioembolization, TAE)患者的各种动脉损伤类型及临床特点。方法:回顾性分析2009年4月至2023年12月间因PCNL术后严重出血而行肾动脉造影(RA)的52例患者。其中38例患者因RA阳性结果行TAE。总结TAE患者的性别、年龄、体重指数、TAE间隔、血红蛋白(Hb)下降、手术时间、结石大小、尿路数量及大小、临床出血类型等临床资料。分析TAE患者动脉损伤的类型及其与临床特征的关系。结果:回顾性分析38例TAE患者(男32例,女6例),TAE平均间隔时间5.00(6.25)天,平均Hb下降44.50 (24.50)g/L,平均束数1 (0.25)g/L,平均束大小F20(6) g/L。在TAE患者中,观察到4种血管损伤,分别为假性动脉瘤(PA) 18例、动脉血管瘘(ACF) 12例、动静脉瘘(AVF) 7例、动脉肾周瘘(APF) 1例。分析三种类型血管损伤(PA、ACF和AVF)的临床特征,发现束数是唯一不同的因素。结论:RA结果提示术后肾动脉损伤类型主要有PA、ACF、AVF、APF,且束数可能与血管损伤类型有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
期刊最新文献
Redefining precision in biliary surgery: a paradigm shift from operative mastery to prognostic-driven strategy. Surgical decision making in late-presenting Hirschsprung's disease: direct pull-though or stoma first. Analysis of the current status of research on perianal lesions associated with Crohn's disease: a bibliometric and visualization analysis. Hemiarthroplasty vs. proximal femoral nail fixation in unstable pertrochanteric fractures: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Risk factors for postoperative febrile urinary tract infection in patients with urolithiasis: a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1