Assessing Kinesiophobia and Catastrophizing Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Efficacy of Capacitive-Resistive Monopolar Radiofrequency Combined with Myofascial Techniques vs. Sham Radiofrequency in Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome-A Secondary Analysis.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Urogynecology Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1007/s00192-025-06052-x
Andrea Carralero-Martínez, Cristina Naranjo-Ortiz, Laia Blanco-Ratto, Stéphanie Kauffmann, Inés Ramírez-García
{"title":"Assessing Kinesiophobia and Catastrophizing Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Efficacy of Capacitive-Resistive Monopolar Radiofrequency Combined with Myofascial Techniques vs. Sham Radiofrequency in Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome-A Secondary Analysis.","authors":"Andrea Carralero-Martínez, Cristina Naranjo-Ortiz, Laia Blanco-Ratto, Stéphanie Kauffmann, Inés Ramírez-García","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06052-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome causes psychological distress, worsened by kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing. This study assesses whether combining capacitive-resistive monopolar radiofrequency with myofascial techniques is more effective than myofascial techniques alone for improving psychological outcomes such as kinesiophobia and catastrophizing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind, randomized controlled trial enrolled 81 chronic pelvic pain syndrome patients (67.9% female, mean age 43.6 years) from March 2019 to April 2021. Participants were assigned to either an activated (intervention) or deactivated (control) capacitive-resistive monopolar radiofrequency group, with both groups receiving physiotherapy and pain education over 10 weeks. Outcomes on kinesiophobia and catastrophizing were assessed at weeks 5 and 10, using the Spanish versions of the Tampa Scale (TSK-11) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At treatment's end, the intervention group showed greater improvement in kinesiophobia (3 points) compared to controls, though nonsignificant (p = .099). The intervention also significantly reduced catastrophizing scores by 8 points versus control (p = .042). No major adverse effects occurred, and adherence was high (86.4%), with no differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that combining capacitive-resistive monopolar radiofrequency with myofascial techniques can improve kinesiophobia and catastrophizing in chronic pelvic pain syndrome patients, such as fear movement and catastrophic thinking related to pain. This marks a potential breakthrough in chronic pain management. Future research should focus on larger, multicenter RCTs with extended follow-up periods to better assess long-term effects.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Clinical trial registration (NCT03797911).</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"799-811"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06052-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome causes psychological distress, worsened by kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing. This study assesses whether combining capacitive-resistive monopolar radiofrequency with myofascial techniques is more effective than myofascial techniques alone for improving psychological outcomes such as kinesiophobia and catastrophizing.

Methods: This double-blind, randomized controlled trial enrolled 81 chronic pelvic pain syndrome patients (67.9% female, mean age 43.6 years) from March 2019 to April 2021. Participants were assigned to either an activated (intervention) or deactivated (control) capacitive-resistive monopolar radiofrequency group, with both groups receiving physiotherapy and pain education over 10 weeks. Outcomes on kinesiophobia and catastrophizing were assessed at weeks 5 and 10, using the Spanish versions of the Tampa Scale (TSK-11) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS).

Results: At treatment's end, the intervention group showed greater improvement in kinesiophobia (3 points) compared to controls, though nonsignificant (p = .099). The intervention also significantly reduced catastrophizing scores by 8 points versus control (p = .042). No major adverse effects occurred, and adherence was high (86.4%), with no differences between groups.

Conclusion: This study shows that combining capacitive-resistive monopolar radiofrequency with myofascial techniques can improve kinesiophobia and catastrophizing in chronic pelvic pain syndrome patients, such as fear movement and catastrophic thinking related to pain. This marks a potential breakthrough in chronic pain management. Future research should focus on larger, multicenter RCTs with extended follow-up periods to better assess long-term effects.

Registration: Clinical trial registration (NCT03797911).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一项随机对照试验中评估运动恐惧症并对患者报告的结果进行灾难化:电容-电阻单极射频联合肌筋膜技术与假射频治疗慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的疗效-二次分析。
简介和假设:慢性盆腔疼痛综合征引起心理困扰,并因运动恐惧症和疼痛灾难化而恶化。本研究评估了将电容电阻单极射频与肌筋膜技术相结合是否比单独使用肌筋膜技术更有效地改善心理结果,如运动恐惧症和灾难化。方法:该双盲随机对照试验于2019年3月至2021年4月招募81例慢性盆腔疼痛综合征患者(67.9%为女性,平均年龄43.6岁)。参与者被分配到激活(干预)或不激活(对照)的电容电阻单极射频组,两组都接受物理治疗和疼痛教育超过10周。在第5周和第10周使用西班牙版坦帕量表(TSK-11)和疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)评估运动恐惧症和灾难化的结果。结果:在治疗结束时,干预组在运动恐惧症方面比对照组有更大的改善(3分),尽管无统计学意义(p = 0.099)。与对照组相比,干预也显著降低了灾难化得分8分(p = 0.042)。未发生重大不良反应,依从性高(86.4%),组间无差异。结论:本研究表明,容阻单极射频联合肌筋膜技术可改善慢性盆腔疼痛综合征患者的运动恐惧症和灾难化,如与疼痛相关的恐惧运动和灾难思维。这标志着慢性疼痛管理的潜在突破。未来的研究应侧重于更大规模的多中心随机对照试验,延长随访期,以更好地评估长期效果。注册:临床试验注册(NCT03797911)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
期刊最新文献
Hybrid Surgery for Urethral Diverticulum Penetrating the Bladder. Incontinence Severity Index (ISI): Translation and Validation Study of the Russian Version. Outcomes of Redo Dorsal Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty After Failed Ventral Urethroplasty in Women. vNOTES vs Minimally Invasive Colpopexy: National Study and Literature Review. Pharmacological Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence with Atypical Leakage Features, Symptom Response to Short-term Solifenacin Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1