Nathan Alloun, Alexander Orsi, Christopher Plaskos, Thomas Brosset, Florian Boureau, Sophie Putman
{"title":"Posterior cruciate ligament resection increases intraoperative lateral and medial flexion laxity during total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Nathan Alloun, Alexander Orsi, Christopher Plaskos, Thomas Brosset, Florian Boureau, Sophie Putman","doi":"10.1007/s00264-025-06413-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study reports the relationship between posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention vs resection and soft tissue laxity and balance throughout flexion using a robotically controlled ligament tensioner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>55 robotic-assisted TKAs (Total knee arthroplasty) were retrospectively reviewe. The robotic ligament tensioner collected laxity data both before and after PCL resection. Medial and lateral coronal laxity were compared before and after PCL resection at 10°, 45°, and 90° flexion. Gap opening was compared between pre-operative coronal hip-knee-ankle groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lateral laxity was greater after PCL resection at 60° (12.7 ± 2 vs 11.5 ± 3 mm), 75° (13.2 ± 2 vs 11.8 ± 3 mm), and 90° (13.7 ± 2 vs 12.1 ± 3 mm). Medial laxity was significantly greater after PCL resection at 90° (10.1 ± 2 vs 9 ± 2 mm). After PCL resection, laxity in valgus knees increased more compared to neutral/varus knees laterally at 30° (1.2 ± 1 vs 0.3 ± 1 mm), 45° (1.6 ± 1 vs 0.6 ± 1 mm), and 60° (2.1 ± 2 vs 1 ± 1 mm). A similar, but non-significant trend was observed at 90° (2.7 ± 2 vs 1.5 ± 1 mm, p = 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCL resection increases flexion laxity laterally by up to 1.6 mm and medially by 1.1 mm on average, with valgus knees increasing more than neutral/varus knees. The findings emphasize that surgeons should consider the interplay between PCL resection and coronal deformity when planning and executing TKA procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"613-619"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06413-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study reports the relationship between posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention vs resection and soft tissue laxity and balance throughout flexion using a robotically controlled ligament tensioner.
Methods: 55 robotic-assisted TKAs (Total knee arthroplasty) were retrospectively reviewe. The robotic ligament tensioner collected laxity data both before and after PCL resection. Medial and lateral coronal laxity were compared before and after PCL resection at 10°, 45°, and 90° flexion. Gap opening was compared between pre-operative coronal hip-knee-ankle groups.
Results: Lateral laxity was greater after PCL resection at 60° (12.7 ± 2 vs 11.5 ± 3 mm), 75° (13.2 ± 2 vs 11.8 ± 3 mm), and 90° (13.7 ± 2 vs 12.1 ± 3 mm). Medial laxity was significantly greater after PCL resection at 90° (10.1 ± 2 vs 9 ± 2 mm). After PCL resection, laxity in valgus knees increased more compared to neutral/varus knees laterally at 30° (1.2 ± 1 vs 0.3 ± 1 mm), 45° (1.6 ± 1 vs 0.6 ± 1 mm), and 60° (2.1 ± 2 vs 1 ± 1 mm). A similar, but non-significant trend was observed at 90° (2.7 ± 2 vs 1.5 ± 1 mm, p = 0.09).
Conclusion: PCL resection increases flexion laxity laterally by up to 1.6 mm and medially by 1.1 mm on average, with valgus knees increasing more than neutral/varus knees. The findings emphasize that surgeons should consider the interplay between PCL resection and coronal deformity when planning and executing TKA procedures.
目的:本研究报告了使用机器人控制的韧带张力器后交叉韧带(PCL)保留与切除与整个屈曲过程中软组织松弛和平衡的关系。方法:回顾性分析55例机器人辅助全膝关节置换术。机器人韧带张紧器收集PCL切除术前后的松弛数据。在屈曲10°、45°和90°时,比较PCL切除前后冠状动脉内侧和外侧的松弛程度。术前冠状面-髋关节-踝关节组间隙开度比较。结果:PCL切除术后60°(12.7±2 vs 11.5±3 mm)、75°(13.2±2 vs 11.8±3 mm)和90°(13.7±2 vs 12.1±3 mm)侧部松弛更大。内侧松弛度在PCL切除90°后显著增加(10.1±2 vs 9±2 mm)。PCL切除术后,外翻膝关节的松弛度比中性/内翻膝关节的松弛度增加更多,外侧为30°(1.2±1 vs 0.3±1 mm), 45°(1.6±1 vs 0.6±1 mm)和60°(2.1±2 vs 1±1 mm)。在90°处观察到类似但不显著的趋势(2.7±2 vs 1.5±1 mm, p = 0.09)。结论:PCL切除可使外侧屈曲松弛度增加1.6 mm,内侧平均增加1.1 mm,外翻膝关节比中性/内翻膝关节增加更多。研究结果强调,外科医生在计划和执行TKA手术时应考虑PCL切除与冠状畸形之间的相互作用。
期刊介绍:
International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters.
Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable.
The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.