Evaluating the effectiveness of prompt engineering for knowledge graph question answering.

Abstract

Many different methods for prompting large language models have been developed since the emergence of OpenAI's ChatGPT in November 2022. In this work, we evaluate six different few-shot prompting methods. The first set of experiments evaluates three frameworks that focus on the quantity or type of shots in a prompt: a baseline method with a simple prompt and a small number of shots, random few-shot prompting with 10, 20, and 30 shots, and similarity-based few-shot prompting. The second set of experiments target optimizing the prompt or enhancing shots through Large Language Model (LLM)-generated explanations, using three prompting frameworks: Explain then Translate, Question Decomposition Meaning Representation, and Optimization by Prompting. We evaluate these six prompting methods on the newly created Spider4SPARQL benchmark, as it is the most complex SPARQL-based Knowledge Graph Question Answering (KGQA) benchmark to date. Across the various prompting frameworks used, the commercial model is unable to achieve a score over 51%, indicating that KGQA, especially for complex queries, with multiple hops, set operations and filters remains a challenging task for LLMs. Our experiments find that the most successful prompting framework for KGQA is a simple prompt combined with an ontology and five random shots.