Clients' experiences in their first entry to the operating room: a descriptive phenomenological study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Perioperative Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1186/s13741-025-00494-z
Nasim Alipour, Amir Jalali, Rostam Jalali, Alireza Khatony
{"title":"Clients' experiences in their first entry to the operating room: a descriptive phenomenological study.","authors":"Nasim Alipour, Amir Jalali, Rostam Jalali, Alireza Khatony","doi":"10.1186/s13741-025-00494-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The unfamiliar atmosphere of the operating room, waiting for anesthesia, and the process of surgery and anesthesia are some of the factors causing fear and anxiety in patients. It leads to physical and psychological pressure on patients. Better understanding of patients' feelings, beliefs, or fears and recording their experiences for optimal care after surgery is helpful. This study explains the experiences of clients in the first entry to the operating room.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was conducted using a descriptive phenomenological method. In this study, 17 patients who had the experience of entering the operating room for the first time as an elective surgery under general anesthesia over the last 6 months were purposefully selected as participants. Then, they underwent an in-depth and semi-structured interview. After conducting the interview, the participants' statements were qualitatively analyzed using the seven-step Colaizzi method. During the steps of this study, Lincoln and Guba's four reliable criteria were observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By continuous analysis of interviews about patients' experiences, 308 codes, 10 sub-themes, 6 primary themes, and 3 general themes were obtained. Themes included unpleasant emotions experienced, unpleasant atmosphere factors, and the induction of relaxation and hope.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients' exposure to an unfamiliar place with new and unknown equipment, personnel with different clothing, stress, worry, psychosomatic reactions following stress, and annoying environmental factors can lead to an unpleasant experience for patients, if they are not managed. Also, the effective communication of the surgical team with the patients leads to reducing or removing the stress and complications caused by it.</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-025-00494-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The unfamiliar atmosphere of the operating room, waiting for anesthesia, and the process of surgery and anesthesia are some of the factors causing fear and anxiety in patients. It leads to physical and psychological pressure on patients. Better understanding of patients' feelings, beliefs, or fears and recording their experiences for optimal care after surgery is helpful. This study explains the experiences of clients in the first entry to the operating room.

Methods: This qualitative study was conducted using a descriptive phenomenological method. In this study, 17 patients who had the experience of entering the operating room for the first time as an elective surgery under general anesthesia over the last 6 months were purposefully selected as participants. Then, they underwent an in-depth and semi-structured interview. After conducting the interview, the participants' statements were qualitatively analyzed using the seven-step Colaizzi method. During the steps of this study, Lincoln and Guba's four reliable criteria were observed.

Results: By continuous analysis of interviews about patients' experiences, 308 codes, 10 sub-themes, 6 primary themes, and 3 general themes were obtained. Themes included unpleasant emotions experienced, unpleasant atmosphere factors, and the induction of relaxation and hope.

Conclusion: Patients' exposure to an unfamiliar place with new and unknown equipment, personnel with different clothing, stress, worry, psychosomatic reactions following stress, and annoying environmental factors can lead to an unpleasant experience for patients, if they are not managed. Also, the effective communication of the surgical team with the patients leads to reducing or removing the stress and complications caused by it.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:手术室的陌生气氛、等待麻醉以及手术和麻醉过程是导致患者恐惧和焦虑的部分因素。这会给患者带来生理和心理压力。更好地了解患者的感受、信念或恐惧,并记录他们的经历,有助于术后的最佳护理。本研究解释了患者首次进入手术室的经历:本研究采用描述性现象学方法进行定性研究。在这项研究中,我们有目的地选择了 17 名在过去 6 个月中有过首次进入手术室经历的患者作为参与者。然后,他们接受了深入的半结构式访谈。访谈结束后,采用科莱兹七步法对参与者的陈述进行了定性分析。在这一研究步骤中,林肯和古巴的四个可靠标准得到了遵守:通过对患者经历的访谈进行连续分析,得出了 308 个代码、10 个子主题、6 个主主题和 3 个总主题。主题包括不愉快的情绪体验、不愉快的氛围因素、放松和希望的诱导:结论:如果不加以控制,患者在陌生的地方接触到新的未知设备、不同服装的人员、压力、担忧、压力后的心身反应以及恼人的环境因素都可能导致患者经历不愉快的经历。此外,手术团队与患者的有效沟通也会减少或消除压力及其引起的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Construction and application of a stratified nursing intervention program for postoperative delirium after Stanford type A aortic dissection: a quasi-experimental trial. Global research trends in music therapy for surgery: a bibliometric analysis (2009-2023). Clients' experiences in their first entry to the operating room: a descriptive phenomenological study. The effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) application on airway problems in pediatric patients with subglottic stenosis who undergo balloon dilatation. Analgesic efficacy and safety of methylene blue combined with cocktail for periarticular infiltration following total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1