Exploring factors behind patient non-adherence to intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in macular diseases.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic Research Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1159/000543352
Efrat Naaman, Noa Yanir-Prat, Diana Shair, Nitai Bar, Beata Miller, Anna Fishman, Shiri Zayit-Soudry
{"title":"Exploring factors behind patient non-adherence to intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in macular diseases.","authors":"Efrat Naaman, Noa Yanir-Prat, Diana Shair, Nitai Bar, Beata Miller, Anna Fishman, Shiri Zayit-Soudry","doi":"10.1159/000543352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years, intravitreal injections (IVT) of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors have become the standard of care for several macular disorders. Frequently, the therapeutic course requires numerous injections, posing a burden on patients. Non-adherence to treatment may result in reduced visual outcomes, therefore understanding and addressing the underlying causes is imperative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of patients who missed their scheduled appointment for anti-VEGF IVT as part of the routine management of their macular disease at a single tertiary center between November 2020 and February 2021. A telephone survey was conducted and patient medical charts were reviewed for ophthalmological data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100/556 (18%) patients who failed to attend their scheduled anti-VEGF IVT appointments were documented. Among these subjects, the average age was 66 (SD ±14) years with a nearly equal gender distribution of 49:51 F:M ratio. Reported no-show reasons included concurrent illness (39%), administrative issues such as missing financial coverage forms or scheduling problems (28%), and lack of motivation (11%). Additionally, 73% of patients who missed appointments expressed a need for accompaniment, and 74% resided outside the hospital city.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study results highlight modifiable factors contributing to no-shows to anti-VEGF IVT, such as poor transportation access, complicated administrative processes, and difficulty rescheduling missed appointments. Understanding potential obstacles to anti-VEGF IVT therapy, particularly those that are preventable, can enhance adherence and potentially improve the clinical outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":19662,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543352","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, intravitreal injections (IVT) of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors have become the standard of care for several macular disorders. Frequently, the therapeutic course requires numerous injections, posing a burden on patients. Non-adherence to treatment may result in reduced visual outcomes, therefore understanding and addressing the underlying causes is imperative.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of patients who missed their scheduled appointment for anti-VEGF IVT as part of the routine management of their macular disease at a single tertiary center between November 2020 and February 2021. A telephone survey was conducted and patient medical charts were reviewed for ophthalmological data.

Results: A total of 100/556 (18%) patients who failed to attend their scheduled anti-VEGF IVT appointments were documented. Among these subjects, the average age was 66 (SD ±14) years with a nearly equal gender distribution of 49:51 F:M ratio. Reported no-show reasons included concurrent illness (39%), administrative issues such as missing financial coverage forms or scheduling problems (28%), and lack of motivation (11%). Additionally, 73% of patients who missed appointments expressed a need for accompaniment, and 74% resided outside the hospital city.

Conclusions: Study results highlight modifiable factors contributing to no-shows to anti-VEGF IVT, such as poor transportation access, complicated administrative processes, and difficulty rescheduling missed appointments. Understanding potential obstacles to anti-VEGF IVT therapy, particularly those that are preventable, can enhance adherence and potentially improve the clinical outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmic Research
Ophthalmic Research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
75
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Ophthalmic Research'' features original papers and reviews reporting on translational and clinical studies. Authors from throughout the world cover research topics on every field in connection with physical, physiologic, pharmacological, biochemical and molecular biological aspects of ophthalmology. This journal also aims to provide a record of international clinical research for both researchers and clinicians in ophthalmology. Finally, the transfer of information from fundamental research to clinical research and clinical practice is particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Exploring factors behind patient non-adherence to intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in macular diseases. Prevalence and Causes of Blindness and Vision Impairment in the State of Qatar - Results of a Population-based Cross-Sectional Study. The change of ciliary muscle-trabecular meshwork-Schlemm canal complex after phacoemulsification using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Impact of patient characteristics and surgery-related risk factors on endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: a meta-analysis. Analysis of Retinal and Choroidal Microvasculature in Systemic Sclerosis Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1