Prevalence of Pathogenic Variants and Eligibility Criteria for Genetic Testing in Patients Who Visit a Memory Clinic.

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology Pub Date : 2025-02-25 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000210273
Sven J Van Der Lee, Marc Hulsman, Rosalina Van Spaendonk, Jetske Van Der Schaar, Janna Dijkstra, Niccoló Tesi, Fred van Ruissen, Mariet Elting, Marcel Reinders, Itziar De Rojas, Corien C Verschuuren-Bemelmans, Wiesje M Van Der Flier, Mieke M van Haelst, Christa de Geus, Yolande Pijnenburg, Henne Holstege
{"title":"Prevalence of Pathogenic Variants and Eligibility Criteria for Genetic Testing in Patients Who Visit a Memory Clinic.","authors":"Sven J Van Der Lee, Marc Hulsman, Rosalina Van Spaendonk, Jetske Van Der Schaar, Janna Dijkstra, Niccoló Tesi, Fred van Ruissen, Mariet Elting, Marcel Reinders, Itziar De Rojas, Corien C Verschuuren-Bemelmans, Wiesje M Van Der Flier, Mieke M van Haelst, Christa de Geus, Yolande Pijnenburg, Henne Holstege","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000210273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Identifying genetic causes of dementia in patients visiting memory clinics is important for patient care and family planning. Traditional clinical selection criteria for genetic testing may miss carriers of pathogenic variants in dementia-related genes. This study aimed identify how many carriers we are missing and to optimize criteria for selecting patients for genetic counseling in memory clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this clinical cohort study, we retrospectively genetically tested patients during 2.5 years (2010-2012) visiting the Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, a specialized memory clinic. Genetic tests consisted of a 54-gene dementia panel, focusing on Class IV/V variants per American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines, including <i>APP</i> duplications and the <i>C9ORF72</i> repeat expansion. We determined the prevalence of pathogenic variants and propose new eligibility criteria for genetic testing in memory clinics. The eligibility criteria were prospectively applied for 1 year (2021-2022), and results were compared with the retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Genetic tests were retrospectively performed in in 1,022 of 1,138 patients (90%) who consecutively visited the memory clinic. Among these, 1,022 patients analyzed (mean age 62.1 ± 8.9 years; 40.4% were female), 34 pathogenic variant carriers were identified (3.3%), with 24 being symptomatic. Previous clinical criteria would have identified only 15 carriers (44% of all carriers, 65% of symptomatic carriers). The proposed criteria increased identification to 22 carriers (62.5% of all carriers, 91% of symptomatic carriers). In the prospective cohort, 148 (28.7%) of 515 patients were eligible for testing under the new criteria. Of the 90 eligible patients who consented to testing, 13 pathogenic carriers were identified, representing a 73% increase compared with the previous criteria.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We found that patients who visit a memory clinic and carry a pathogenic genetic variant are often not eligible for genetic testing. The proposed new criteria improve the identification of patients with a genetic cause for their cognitive complaints. In systems without practical or financial barriers to genetic testing, the new criteria can enhance personalized care. In other countries where the health care systems differs and in other genetic ancestry groups, the performance of the criteria may be different.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"104 4","pages":"e210273"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11776143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000210273","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Identifying genetic causes of dementia in patients visiting memory clinics is important for patient care and family planning. Traditional clinical selection criteria for genetic testing may miss carriers of pathogenic variants in dementia-related genes. This study aimed identify how many carriers we are missing and to optimize criteria for selecting patients for genetic counseling in memory clinics.

Methods: In this clinical cohort study, we retrospectively genetically tested patients during 2.5 years (2010-2012) visiting the Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, a specialized memory clinic. Genetic tests consisted of a 54-gene dementia panel, focusing on Class IV/V variants per American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines, including APP duplications and the C9ORF72 repeat expansion. We determined the prevalence of pathogenic variants and propose new eligibility criteria for genetic testing in memory clinics. The eligibility criteria were prospectively applied for 1 year (2021-2022), and results were compared with the retrospective cohort.

Results: Genetic tests were retrospectively performed in in 1,022 of 1,138 patients (90%) who consecutively visited the memory clinic. Among these, 1,022 patients analyzed (mean age 62.1 ± 8.9 years; 40.4% were female), 34 pathogenic variant carriers were identified (3.3%), with 24 being symptomatic. Previous clinical criteria would have identified only 15 carriers (44% of all carriers, 65% of symptomatic carriers). The proposed criteria increased identification to 22 carriers (62.5% of all carriers, 91% of symptomatic carriers). In the prospective cohort, 148 (28.7%) of 515 patients were eligible for testing under the new criteria. Of the 90 eligible patients who consented to testing, 13 pathogenic carriers were identified, representing a 73% increase compared with the previous criteria.

Discussion: We found that patients who visit a memory clinic and carry a pathogenic genetic variant are often not eligible for genetic testing. The proposed new criteria improve the identification of patients with a genetic cause for their cognitive complaints. In systems without practical or financial barriers to genetic testing, the new criteria can enhance personalized care. In other countries where the health care systems differs and in other genetic ancestry groups, the performance of the criteria may be different.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
访问记忆诊所的患者中致病变异的患病率和基因检测的资格标准。
背景与目的:识别记忆门诊患者痴呆的遗传原因对患者护理和计划生育具有重要意义。传统的临床基因检测选择标准可能会遗漏痴呆相关基因致病性变异的携带者。这项研究旨在确定我们缺失了多少携带者,并优化记忆诊所选择患者进行遗传咨询的标准。方法:在这项临床队列研究中,我们回顾性地对在阿姆斯特丹阿尔茨海默中心(一家专门的记忆诊所)就诊的患者进行了2.5年(2010-2012年)的基因检测。基因测试包括一个54个基因痴呆小组,根据美国医学遗传学和基因组学学院的指南,重点关注IV/V类变异,包括APP重复和C9ORF72重复扩增。我们确定了致病变异的患病率,并提出了记忆诊所基因检测的新资格标准。入选标准前瞻性应用1年(2021-2022),并与回顾性队列结果进行比较。结果:对连续访问记忆诊所的1138名患者中的1022名(90%)进行回顾性基因检测。其中1022例患者(平均年龄62.1±8.9岁;女性40.4%),发现病原变异携带者34例(3.3%),有症状者24例。以前的临床标准只能确定15名携带者(占所有携带者的44%,有症状携带者的65%)。拟议的标准将识别增加到22名携带者(占所有携带者的62.5%,有症状携带者的91%)。在前瞻性队列研究中,515例患者中有148例(28.7%)符合新标准。在同意检测的90名符合条件的患者中,确定了13名致病携带者,与以前的标准相比增加了73%。讨论:我们发现访问记忆诊所并携带致病基因变异的患者通常不适合进行基因检测。提出的新标准提高了对患者认知疾病遗传原因的识别。在基因检测没有实际或经济障碍的系统中,新标准可以加强个性化护理。在卫生保健系统不同的其他国家和在其他遗传祖先群体中,标准的执行可能不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Primary Motor Cortex Involvement and Its Association With Seizure Risk in Patients With Brain Metastases. Detection of Ruptured and Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Has Decreased: A Population-Based Study. Stroke Incidence, Case Fatality, and Mortality Using the WHO International Classification of Diseases 11: The Geneva Stroke Study. Prospective Study of Video Hand Opening Time as a Quantitative Measurement of Myotonia in Patients With Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1. When the Brain Mourns Itself.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1