Where does the tether break in vertebral body tethering cases? Clinical insights from revision cases after tether breakage.

IF 1.7 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine deformity Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1007/s43390-025-01048-5
Mahmoud Alkharsawi, Alice Baroncini, Dong-Gune Chang, Miguel Pishnamaz, Per David Trobisch
{"title":"Where does the tether break in vertebral body tethering cases? Clinical insights from revision cases after tether breakage.","authors":"Mahmoud Alkharsawi, Alice Baroncini, Dong-Gune Chang, Miguel Pishnamaz, Per David Trobisch","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01048-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the sites where the tether breaks in vertebral body tethering (VBT) cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Intraoperative evaluation of broken tethers in patients who had anterior revision.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>anterior revision of VBT cases with explantation of the full implant and photo documentation. Eight patients met the inclusion criteria. The primary variable of interest was the location of tether breakage in relation to the vertebral curve and the tether-screw interface. Another variable of interest was to evaluate the difference in breakage rates between anterior and posterior tethers in double tether cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty tethers bridging the intervertebral disc within this cohort of eight patients were found. Seven implants were removed from thoracolumbar curves and one implant from a thoracic curve. We identified 32 tether breakages. Double tethers were used in six patients. In these six cases, 15 breakages were found in the posterior tether and 13 in the anterior tether. Four cases (50%) exhibited breakages at the apex, eight cases (100%) at the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV), and five cases (63%) at the uppermost-instrumented vertebra (UIV). Five tether breakages (in three cases with double tether) were observed at the screw sites, while the remaining 27 exhibited cord breakages near the intervertebral discs. In double tether systems, statistical analysis did not reveal any significant difference in breakage rates between anterior and posterior tethers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In VBT cases, the tether breaks mostly at the level of the intervertebral disc, adjacent to the lowest instrumented vertebra.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV (Case series with no comparison group).</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":"1107-1114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01048-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the sites where the tether breaks in vertebral body tethering (VBT) cases.

Methods: Intraoperative evaluation of broken tethers in patients who had anterior revision.

Inclusion criteria: anterior revision of VBT cases with explantation of the full implant and photo documentation. Eight patients met the inclusion criteria. The primary variable of interest was the location of tether breakage in relation to the vertebral curve and the tether-screw interface. Another variable of interest was to evaluate the difference in breakage rates between anterior and posterior tethers in double tether cases.

Results: Sixty tethers bridging the intervertebral disc within this cohort of eight patients were found. Seven implants were removed from thoracolumbar curves and one implant from a thoracic curve. We identified 32 tether breakages. Double tethers were used in six patients. In these six cases, 15 breakages were found in the posterior tether and 13 in the anterior tether. Four cases (50%) exhibited breakages at the apex, eight cases (100%) at the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV), and five cases (63%) at the uppermost-instrumented vertebra (UIV). Five tether breakages (in three cases with double tether) were observed at the screw sites, while the remaining 27 exhibited cord breakages near the intervertebral discs. In double tether systems, statistical analysis did not reveal any significant difference in breakage rates between anterior and posterior tethers.

Conclusions: In VBT cases, the tether breaks mostly at the level of the intervertebral disc, adjacent to the lowest instrumented vertebra.

Level of evidence: Level IV (Case series with no comparison group).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在椎体系扎病例中,系扎在哪里断裂?系索断裂后翻修病例的临床观察。
目的:探讨椎体捆扎术(VBT)中系索断裂的部位。方法:术中评价前路翻修术患者系索断裂的情况。纳入标准:VBT病例前路翻修,全部种植体外移并有照片记录。8例患者符合纳入标准。主要的变量是系索断裂的位置与椎体曲线和系索-螺钉界面的关系。另一个感兴趣的变量是评估双系索病例中前后系索断裂率的差异。结果:在这组8例患者中发现了60个桥接椎间盘的系索。从胸腰椎弯曲处取出7个植入物,从胸腰椎弯曲处取出1个植入物。我们确定了32处系绳断裂。6例患者使用双系索。在这6例中,15例发现后系索断裂,13例发现前系索断裂。4例(50%)骨折发生在椎体顶点,8例(100%)骨折发生在最低椎体(LIV), 5例(63%)骨折发生在最高椎体(UIV)。在螺钉位置观察到5例系索断裂(其中3例为双系索),而其余27例在椎间盘附近出现脊髓断裂。在双系索系统中,统计分析未发现前后系索断裂率有显著差异。结论:在VBT病例中,系索断裂主要发生在椎间盘水平,靠近最低的固定椎体。证据等级:四级(无对照组的病例系列)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with prolonged brace wear in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Is there an added benefit of intraoperative traction to posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lumbar curve correction is durable at 5 years after thoracic fusion in patients with open triradiate cartilage: a cohort comparison to mature patients. Looking back to move forward: why history matters so much in spine surgery. The rise and fall of lateral electrical surface stimulation (LESS) through the lens of SRS archives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1