Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis vs open anastomosis for ileostomy reversal in Crohn's disease: A single center retrospective study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.98269
Wei-Hang Liu, Mao Xiong, Guo-Qing Chen, Zhui Long, Chao Xu, Li Zhu, Jing-Song Wu
{"title":"Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis <i>vs</i> open anastomosis for ileostomy reversal in Crohn's disease: A single center retrospective study.","authors":"Wei-Hang Liu, Mao Xiong, Guo-Qing Chen, Zhui Long, Chao Xu, Li Zhu, Jing-Song Wu","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.98269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an increased maturation of laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis techniques. However, research on its application for small bowel stoma reversal in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) is limited. Therefore, in this study, we compared the perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic intracorporeal ileostomy reversal (LIIR) and open ileostomy reversal (OIR).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the safety, feasibility, bowel function recovery, and short- and long-term LIIR and OIR outcomes in patients with CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients who underwent ileal reversal for CD between January 2021 and January 2023 at our institution. The baseline data, postoperative recovery, and complication indicators were retrospectively analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore factors that significantly influenced the development of enteral nutrition intolerance-related symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Notably, 15 of the 45 patients in this study underwent OIR, and the remaining 30 received LIIR. Notably, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding clinical baseline characteristics, operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, anastomotic site, enterolysis range, first postoperative flatus, postoperative complications, reoperation rate, or incidence of postoperative enteral nutrition intolerance. Compared with the OIR group, the LIIR group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay (<i>P</i> = 0.045), lower incidence of enteral nutrition intolerance symptoms (<i>P</i> = 0.019), and earlier postoperative total enteral nutrition initiation (<i>P</i> = 0.033); however, it incurred higher total hospital costs (<i>P</i> = 0.038). Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the duration of surgery and anastomotic technique were independent risk factors for postoperative symptoms of enteral nutrition intolerance (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for ileostomy reversal is safe and feasible. Patients who underwent this technique demonstrated improved tolerance to postoperative enteral nutrition and quicker resumption of total enteral nutrition.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":"98269"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.98269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is an increased maturation of laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis techniques. However, research on its application for small bowel stoma reversal in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) is limited. Therefore, in this study, we compared the perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic intracorporeal ileostomy reversal (LIIR) and open ileostomy reversal (OIR).

Aim: To compare the safety, feasibility, bowel function recovery, and short- and long-term LIIR and OIR outcomes in patients with CD.

Methods: This study included patients who underwent ileal reversal for CD between January 2021 and January 2023 at our institution. The baseline data, postoperative recovery, and complication indicators were retrospectively analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore factors that significantly influenced the development of enteral nutrition intolerance-related symptoms.

Results: Notably, 15 of the 45 patients in this study underwent OIR, and the remaining 30 received LIIR. Notably, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding clinical baseline characteristics, operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, anastomotic site, enterolysis range, first postoperative flatus, postoperative complications, reoperation rate, or incidence of postoperative enteral nutrition intolerance. Compared with the OIR group, the LIIR group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.045), lower incidence of enteral nutrition intolerance symptoms (P = 0.019), and earlier postoperative total enteral nutrition initiation (P = 0.033); however, it incurred higher total hospital costs (P = 0.038). Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the duration of surgery and anastomotic technique were independent risk factors for postoperative symptoms of enteral nutrition intolerance (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for ileostomy reversal is safe and feasible. Patients who underwent this technique demonstrated improved tolerance to postoperative enteral nutrition and quicker resumption of total enteral nutrition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜体腔内吻合术与开放式吻合术在克罗恩病回肠造口翻转术中的应用:单中心回顾性研究。
背景:腹腔镜体内吻合技术日趋成熟。然而,其在克罗恩病(CD)患者小肠造口逆转中的应用研究有限。因此,在本研究中,我们比较了腹腔镜体内回肠造口逆转(LIIR)和开放式回肠造口逆转(OIR)的围手术期结果。目的:比较CD患者的安全性、可行性、肠功能恢复、短期和长期LIIR和OIR结果。方法:本研究纳入了2021年1月至2023年1月在我院接受回肠逆转治疗的CD患者。回顾性分析基线数据、术后恢复情况和并发症指标。采用Logistic回归分析,探讨影响肠内营养不耐受相关症状发生的因素。结果:值得注意的是,本研究45例患者中有15例接受了OIR,其余30例接受了LIIR。值得注意的是,两组在临床基线特征、手术时间、术中出血、吻合口位置、肠溶范围、术后首次胀气、术后并发症、再手术率、术后肠内营养不耐受发生率等方面均无统计学差异。与OIR组相比,LIIR组术后住院时间较短(P = 0.045),肠内营养不耐受症状发生率较低(P = 0.019),术后总肠内营养起始时间较早(P = 0.033);但总住院费用较高(P = 0.038)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,手术时间和吻合技术是肠内营养不耐受术后症状的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。结论:腹腔镜回肠造口吻合术安全可行。接受该技术的患者表现出对术后肠内营养的耐受性改善和更快地恢复全肠内营养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
期刊最新文献
Augmented intelligence in "robotic" liver surgery: Integrating augmented reality and artificial intelligence for real-time navigation and margin precision. Synchronous vs sequential combination of transarterial chemoembolization and microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Efficacy and prognosis. Colitis cystica profunda diagnosed by laparoscopic excision: A case report and review of literature. Clinical controls and model calibration as keys to complete blood count-based studies of pediatric fistula-in-ano. Two-port vs four-port laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: Efficacy and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1