Implementation of intraoperative procedures to prevent anastomotic leak in low anterior rectal resections: a pilot study for a novel technique to evaluate anastomotic vascularization.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-11506-2
Monica Ortenzi, Andrea Carsetti, Andrea Picchetto, Giancarlo D'Ambrosio, Erika Casarotta, Alberto Sartori, Andrea Balla, Mauro Podda, Abele Donati, Salvatore Iuorio, Giovanni Lezoche, Alberto Arezzo, Mario Guerrieri
{"title":"Implementation of intraoperative procedures to prevent anastomotic leak in low anterior rectal resections: a pilot study for a novel technique to evaluate anastomotic vascularization.","authors":"Monica Ortenzi, Andrea Carsetti, Andrea Picchetto, Giancarlo D'Ambrosio, Erika Casarotta, Alberto Sartori, Andrea Balla, Mauro Podda, Abele Donati, Salvatore Iuorio, Giovanni Lezoche, Alberto Arezzo, Mario Guerrieri","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11506-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Altered vascular microcirculation is recognized as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage (AL) in colorectal surgery. However, few studies evaluated its impact on AL using different devices, with heterogeneous results. The present study reported the initial experience measuring gut microcirculatory density and flow with the aid of incidence dark-field (IDF) videomicroscopy (Cytocam, Braedius, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) comparing its operative outcome using a propensity score matching (PSM) model based on age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Videos from 5 different sites (at least 10 s/site) were recorded from both the mucosal and serosal site of the left colon end after the colonic resection. Total vessel density (TVD), Perfused Vessel Density (PVD), De Backer score, Proportion of Perfused Vessels (PPV), and Microvascular Flow Index (MFI) were analyzed. At each recording, noninvasive measurements of blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, use of vasoactive drugs, and peripheral oxygen saturation were simultaneously recorded. The association between postoperative outcomes and microcirculation evaluation was investigated using PSM analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-nine patients were included in the Cytocam group. The mean TVD small was 8.9 ± 2.8 mm/mm<sup>2</sup>, the PPV small % was 100 in all patients but 1, while the MFI was 3 in all patients. The mean PVD small was 8.76 ± 2.8 mm/mm<sup>2</sup> and the mean De Becker score was 4.4 ± 1.3. In 2 patients (10.5%), the finding of altered vascularization resulted in the change of the operative strategy with an extension of the resection point. AL occurred in 2 patients of the No Cytocam group (p = 0.811).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This type of anastomotic evaluation has shown to be feasible, safe, and useful in easily detecting any alteration of the resected colon before anastomotic construction. Moreover, this technology could offer a more cost-effective manner than other devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"1935-1944"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11506-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Altered vascular microcirculation is recognized as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage (AL) in colorectal surgery. However, few studies evaluated its impact on AL using different devices, with heterogeneous results. The present study reported the initial experience measuring gut microcirculatory density and flow with the aid of incidence dark-field (IDF) videomicroscopy (Cytocam, Braedius, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) comparing its operative outcome using a propensity score matching (PSM) model based on age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).

Materials and methods: Videos from 5 different sites (at least 10 s/site) were recorded from both the mucosal and serosal site of the left colon end after the colonic resection. Total vessel density (TVD), Perfused Vessel Density (PVD), De Backer score, Proportion of Perfused Vessels (PPV), and Microvascular Flow Index (MFI) were analyzed. At each recording, noninvasive measurements of blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, use of vasoactive drugs, and peripheral oxygen saturation were simultaneously recorded. The association between postoperative outcomes and microcirculation evaluation was investigated using PSM analyses.

Results: Ninety-nine patients were included in the Cytocam group. The mean TVD small was 8.9 ± 2.8 mm/mm2, the PPV small % was 100 in all patients but 1, while the MFI was 3 in all patients. The mean PVD small was 8.76 ± 2.8 mm/mm2 and the mean De Becker score was 4.4 ± 1.3. In 2 patients (10.5%), the finding of altered vascularization resulted in the change of the operative strategy with an extension of the resection point. AL occurred in 2 patients of the No Cytocam group (p = 0.811).

Conclusion: This type of anastomotic evaluation has shown to be feasible, safe, and useful in easily detecting any alteration of the resected colon before anastomotic construction. Moreover, this technology could offer a more cost-effective manner than other devices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在低位直肠前切除术中实施术中程序以防止吻合口漏:一项评估吻合口血管的新技术的试点研究。
导言:血管微循环改变被认为是结直肠手术中吻合口漏的危险因素。然而,很少有研究评估其对使用不同设备的AL的影响,结果也不尽相同。本研究报告了利用发生率暗场(IDF)视频显微镜(Cytocam, Braedius, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)测量肠道微循环密度和流量的初步经验,使用基于年龄、性别和Charlson合并症指数(CCI)的倾向评分匹配(PSM)模型比较其手术结果。材料和方法:在结肠切除后的左结肠末端粘膜和浆膜处分别记录5个不同部位的视频(至少10s /个)。分析总血管密度(TVD)、灌注血管密度(PVD)、De Backer评分、灌注血管比例(PPV)、微血管流动指数(MFI)。在每次记录中,同时记录血压、心率、体温、血管活性药物的使用和外周氧饱和度的无创测量。使用PSM分析研究术后结果与微循环评价之间的关系。结果:99例患者纳入Cytocam组。TVD小的平均值为8.9±2.8 mm/mm2, PPV小的百分比除1外均为100,MFI为3。平均PVD小为8.76±2.8 mm/mm2,平均De Becker评分为4.4±1.3。2例患者(10.5%)因发现血管化改变而改变手术策略,扩大切除点。无Cytocam组有2例发生AL (p = 0.811)。结论:这种吻合器评价方法可行、安全,可在吻合器构建前方便地发现切除结肠的任何改变。此外,这项技术可以提供比其他设备更具成本效益的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
期刊最新文献
Comparative benefits of robotic gastrectomy over laparoscopic surgery across different age and BMI groups. Balloon dilation versus endoscopic stricturotomy in the treatment of Crohn's anastomotic stricture: experimental randomized study. Comparative seven year outcomes of RYGB and SADI-S as revisional procedures for weight recurrence regain after sleeve gastrectomy: weight loss trajectory, reflux control, and metabolic safety. Comparison of laparoscopic and robotic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastric ischemic conditioning before esophagectomy: contemporary practices and insights from an international survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1