Nursing professionalism and associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-02713-w
Moges Tadesse Abebe, Agerie Mengistie Zeleke, Yeshiwas Ayale Ferede, Yosef Aragaw Gonete, Worku Chekol Tassew
{"title":"Nursing professionalism and associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Moges Tadesse Abebe, Agerie Mengistie Zeleke, Yeshiwas Ayale Ferede, Yosef Aragaw Gonete, Worku Chekol Tassew","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02713-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A higher level of nursing professionalism improves autonomy among nurses, the quality of nursing care, and patient outcomes. However, inconsistent findings on the prevalence of nursing professionalism and associated factors have been reported among studies conducted in Ethiopia, and a meta-analysis of pooled results have not been performed. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the pooled prevalence of higher levels of nursing professionalism and factors associated with it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Science Direct, HINARI, African Journals Online, Google Scholar, and university online institutional repositories in Ethiopia were accessed from 15/10/2024-30/10/2024. The items were assessed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The quality of the included studies was assessed via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Cross-sectional studies were included without time period limits. Data extraction was conducted via Microsoft Excel and analyzed with STATA 17. The Galbraith plot, I<sup>2</sup> statistic and meta-regression were used to determine heterogeneity. We used a random effects model in the presence of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed via funnel plots and Egger's based regression. We also computed a sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis by sample size and study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve primary studies involving 3710 nurses were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of higher levels of nursing professionalism was 43%. Bachelor's degree and above educational status (POR: 1.80, CI: 1.38, 2.33), learning from government colleges (POR: 2.14, CI: 1.34, 3.42), better payment (POR: 1.85, CI: 1.16, 2.98), long years of work experience (POR: 2.15, CI: 1.73, 2.68), positive self-image (POR: 3.85, CI: 2.17, 6.84), job satisfaction (POR: 2.42, CI: 1.49, 3.95) and training opportunities (POR: 2.88, CI: 1.14, 7.32) were factors that determined higher levels of nursing professionalism in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pooled prevalence of higher levels of nursing professionalism in Ethiopia was low. Educational status, and attending college, payment, work experience, self-image, job satisfaction, and training were factors that determined the level of professionalism. These factors can be modified to increase the level of nursing professionalism in Ethiopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"95"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02713-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A higher level of nursing professionalism improves autonomy among nurses, the quality of nursing care, and patient outcomes. However, inconsistent findings on the prevalence of nursing professionalism and associated factors have been reported among studies conducted in Ethiopia, and a meta-analysis of pooled results have not been performed. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the pooled prevalence of higher levels of nursing professionalism and factors associated with it.

Methods: PubMed, Science Direct, HINARI, African Journals Online, Google Scholar, and university online institutional repositories in Ethiopia were accessed from 15/10/2024-30/10/2024. The items were assessed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The quality of the included studies was assessed via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Cross-sectional studies were included without time period limits. Data extraction was conducted via Microsoft Excel and analyzed with STATA 17. The Galbraith plot, I2 statistic and meta-regression were used to determine heterogeneity. We used a random effects model in the presence of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed via funnel plots and Egger's based regression. We also computed a sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis by sample size and study period.

Results: Twelve primary studies involving 3710 nurses were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of higher levels of nursing professionalism was 43%. Bachelor's degree and above educational status (POR: 1.80, CI: 1.38, 2.33), learning from government colleges (POR: 2.14, CI: 1.34, 3.42), better payment (POR: 1.85, CI: 1.16, 2.98), long years of work experience (POR: 2.15, CI: 1.73, 2.68), positive self-image (POR: 3.85, CI: 2.17, 6.84), job satisfaction (POR: 2.42, CI: 1.49, 3.95) and training opportunities (POR: 2.88, CI: 1.14, 7.32) were factors that determined higher levels of nursing professionalism in Ethiopia.

Conclusion: The pooled prevalence of higher levels of nursing professionalism in Ethiopia was low. Educational status, and attending college, payment, work experience, self-image, job satisfaction, and training were factors that determined the level of professionalism. These factors can be modified to increase the level of nursing professionalism in Ethiopia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理专业和相关因素在埃塞俄比亚:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:护理专业水平的提高提高了护士的自主性、护理质量和患者预后。然而,在埃塞俄比亚进行的研究中,关于护理专业程度和相关因素的调查结果不一致,并且没有对汇总结果进行荟萃分析。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是确定较高护理专业水平的总体患病率及其相关因素。方法:从2024年10月15日至2024年10月30日访问PubMed、Science Direct、HINARI、African Journals Online、谷歌Scholar和埃塞俄比亚的大学在线机构知识库。这些项目按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行评估。纳入研究的质量通过纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。横断面研究纳入,没有时间限制。通过Microsoft Excel进行数据提取,并使用STATA 17进行分析。采用Galbraith图、I2统计量和meta回归来确定异质性。在异质性存在的情况下,我们使用随机效应模型。通过漏斗图和Egger’s回归评估发表偏倚。我们还根据样本量和研究时间计算了敏感性分析和亚组分析。结果:本系统综述和荟萃分析纳入了12项涉及3710名护士的初步研究。较高护理专业水平的总患病率为43%。本科及以上学历(POR: 1.80, CI: 1.38, 2.33)、从公立大学学习(POR: 2.14, CI: 1.34, 3.42)、较好的薪酬(POR: 1.85, CI: 1.16, 2.98)、较长的工作经验(POR: 2.15, CI: 1.73, 2.68)、积极的自我形象(POR: 3.85, CI: 2.17, 6.84)、工作满意度(POR: 2.42, CI: 1.49, 3.95)和培训机会(POR: 2.88, CI: 1.14, 7.32)是决定埃塞俄比亚护理专业水平较高的因素。结论:埃塞俄比亚护理专业水平较高的总体患病率较低。受教育程度、大学就读程度、薪酬、工作经验、自我形象、工作满意度和培训是决定专业水平的因素。这些因素可以修改,以提高护理专业水平在埃塞俄比亚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Health literacy and biosimilar acceptance in people with multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study. Comparison of immersive virtual reality and video-based home visit simulations for developing nursing students' perceived clinical reasoning, learning satisfaction, and engagement: a randomized controlled trial. Perceived organizational support as a mediator between role clarity and work engagement among neurology specialist nurses: a cross-sectional study. Nursing home nurses' experiences of psychological resilience development in dementia care: a qualitative descriptive study. The importance of Continuing Professional Development of clinical competence in municipal healthcare: a cross-sectional study of workplace-based training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1