An intelligent decision-making system for embryo transfer in reproductive technology: a machine learning-based approach.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ANDROLOGY Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1080/19396368.2024.2445831
Sanaa Badr, Meryem Tahri, Mohamed Maanan, Jan Kašpar, Noura Yousfi
{"title":"An intelligent decision-making system for embryo transfer in reproductive technology: a machine learning-based approach.","authors":"Sanaa Badr, Meryem Tahri, Mohamed Maanan, Jan Kašpar, Noura Yousfi","doi":"10.1080/19396368.2024.2445831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infertility has emerged as a significant public health concern, with assisted reproductive technology (ART) is a last-resort treatment option. However, ART's efficacy is limited by significant financial cost and physical discomfort. The aim of this study is to build Machine learning (ML) decision-support models to predict the optimal range of embryo numbers to transfer, using data from infertile couples identified through literature reviews. Binary classification models were developed to classify cases into two groups: those transferring two or fewer embryos and those transferring three or four. Four popular ML algorithms were used, including random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN), considering seven criteria: the woman's age, sperm origin, the developmental qualities of four potential embryos, infertility duration, assessment of the woman, morphological qualities of the four best embryos on the day of transfer, and number of oocytes extracted. The stratified 3-fold cross-validation results show that the SVM model obtained the highest average accuracy (95.83%) and demonstrated the best overall performance, closely followed by the ANN and LR models with an average accuracy equal to 91.67%. The RF model achieved a slightly lower average accuracy (88.89%), which demonstrated the lowest variability. Testing on a new dataset revealed all models performed well, with ANN and SVM models classified all test set instances correctly, while the RF and LR models achieved 91.68% accuracy. These results highlight the superior generalization and effectiveness of the ANN and SVM models in guiding ART decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22184,"journal":{"name":"Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine","volume":"71 1","pages":"13-28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2024.2445831","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infertility has emerged as a significant public health concern, with assisted reproductive technology (ART) is a last-resort treatment option. However, ART's efficacy is limited by significant financial cost and physical discomfort. The aim of this study is to build Machine learning (ML) decision-support models to predict the optimal range of embryo numbers to transfer, using data from infertile couples identified through literature reviews. Binary classification models were developed to classify cases into two groups: those transferring two or fewer embryos and those transferring three or four. Four popular ML algorithms were used, including random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN), considering seven criteria: the woman's age, sperm origin, the developmental qualities of four potential embryos, infertility duration, assessment of the woman, morphological qualities of the four best embryos on the day of transfer, and number of oocytes extracted. The stratified 3-fold cross-validation results show that the SVM model obtained the highest average accuracy (95.83%) and demonstrated the best overall performance, closely followed by the ANN and LR models with an average accuracy equal to 91.67%. The RF model achieved a slightly lower average accuracy (88.89%), which demonstrated the lowest variability. Testing on a new dataset revealed all models performed well, with ANN and SVM models classified all test set instances correctly, while the RF and LR models achieved 91.68% accuracy. These results highlight the superior generalization and effectiveness of the ANN and SVM models in guiding ART decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生殖技术中胚胎移植的智能决策系统:基于机器学习的方法。
不孕不育已成为一个重大的公共卫生问题,辅助生殖技术(ART)是最后的治疗选择。然而,ART的疗效受到巨大的财务成本和身体不适的限制。本研究的目的是建立机器学习(ML)决策支持模型,使用通过文献综述确定的不育夫妇的数据来预测移植胚胎数量的最佳范围。建立了二元分类模型,将病例分为两组:移植两个或更少胚胎的病例和移植三个或四个胚胎的病例。采用随机森林(RF)、逻辑回归(LR)、支持向量机(SVM)和人工神经网络(ANN)等4种流行的ML算法,考虑7个标准:女性年龄、精子来源、4个潜在胚胎的发育质量、不孕持续时间、女性评估、移植当天4个最佳胚胎的形态质量和提取的卵母细胞数量。分层3重交叉验证结果表明,SVM模型平均准确率最高(95.83%),综合性能最佳,ANN和LR模型紧随其后,平均准确率为91.67%。RF模型的平均准确率略低(88.89%),这表明变异性最低。在新数据集上的测试表明,所有模型都表现良好,ANN和SVM模型对所有测试集实例的分类正确,而RF和LR模型的准确率达到91.68%。这些结果突出了ANN和SVM模型在指导ART决策方面的卓越泛化和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine, SBiRM, publishes Research Articles, Communications, Applications Notes that include protocols a Clinical Corner that includes case reports, Review Articles and Hypotheses and Letters to the Editor on human and animal reproduction. The journal will highlight the use of systems approaches including genomic, cellular, proteomic, metabolomic, bioinformatic, molecular, and biochemical, to address fundamental questions in reproductive biology, reproductive medicine, and translational research. The journal publishes research involving human and animal gametes, stem cells, developmental biology and toxicology, and clinical care in reproductive medicine. Specific areas of interest to the journal include: male factor infertility and germ cell biology, reproductive technologies (gamete micro-manipulation and cryopreservation, in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF/ET) and contraception. Research that is directed towards developing new or enhanced technologies for clinical medicine or scientific research in reproduction is of significant interest to the journal.
期刊最新文献
SBiRM 2026. A concise overview of mammalian spermatogenesis. Possible mechanisms and clinical innovations of sequential embryo transfer in assisted reproduction. A novel homozygous variant of AURKC causes macrozoospermia in a Chinese family. The biology and clinical aspects of female infertility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1