Poor Olfaction and Risk of Stroke in Older Adults: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048713
Keran W Chamberlin, Chenxi Li, Anna Kucharska-Newton, Zhehui Luo, Mathew Reeves, Srishti Shrestha, Jayant M Pinto, Jennifer A Deal, Vidyulata Kamath, Priya Palta, David Couper, Thomas H Mosley, Honglei Chen
{"title":"Poor Olfaction and Risk of Stroke in Older Adults: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.","authors":"Keran W Chamberlin, Chenxi Li, Anna Kucharska-Newton, Zhehui Luo, Mathew Reeves, Srishti Shrestha, Jayant M Pinto, Jennifer A Deal, Vidyulata Kamath, Priya Palta, David Couper, Thomas H Mosley, Honglei Chen","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor olfaction may be associated with adverse cerebrovascular events, but empirical evidence is limited. We aimed to investigate the association of olfaction with the risk of stroke in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 5799 older adults with no history of stroke at baseline from 2011 to 2013 (75.5±5.1 years, 59.0% female and 22.2% Black). Olfaction was assessed by the 12-item Sniffin' Sticks odor identification test and defined as poor (number correct ≤8), moderate (9-10), or good (11-12). Participants were followed from baseline to the date of the first stroke, death, last contact, or December 31, 2020, whichever occurred first. We used the discrete-time subdistribution hazard model to estimate the marginal cumulative incidence of stroke across olfactory statuses and adjusted risk ratios, accounting for covariates and competing risk of death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After up to 9.6 years of follow-up, we identified 332 incident stroke events. The adjusted marginal cumulative incidence of stroke at 9.6-year follow-up was 5.3% (95% CI, 4.2%-6.3%), 5.9% (95% CI, 4.8%-7.1%), and 7.7% (95% CI, 6.5%-9.1%) for good, moderate, and poor olfaction, respectively. Compared with good olfaction, poor olfaction was significantly associated with higher stroke risk throughout follow-up, albeit the association modestly attenuated after 6 years. Specifically, the adjusted risk ratios were 2.14 (95% CI, 1.22-3.94) at year 2, 1.98 (95% CI, 1.43-3.02) at year 4, 1.91 (95% CI, 1.43-2.77) at year 6, 1.49 (95% CI, 1.17-2.00) at year 8, and 1.45 (95% CI, 1.16-1.95) at year 9.6. Results were robust in multiple subgroup and sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In older adults, poor olfaction assessed by a single olfaction test was associated with the higher risk of stroke in the next 10 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":"56 2","pages":"465-474"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048713","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Poor olfaction may be associated with adverse cerebrovascular events, but empirical evidence is limited. We aimed to investigate the association of olfaction with the risk of stroke in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Methods: We included 5799 older adults with no history of stroke at baseline from 2011 to 2013 (75.5±5.1 years, 59.0% female and 22.2% Black). Olfaction was assessed by the 12-item Sniffin' Sticks odor identification test and defined as poor (number correct ≤8), moderate (9-10), or good (11-12). Participants were followed from baseline to the date of the first stroke, death, last contact, or December 31, 2020, whichever occurred first. We used the discrete-time subdistribution hazard model to estimate the marginal cumulative incidence of stroke across olfactory statuses and adjusted risk ratios, accounting for covariates and competing risk of death.

Results: After up to 9.6 years of follow-up, we identified 332 incident stroke events. The adjusted marginal cumulative incidence of stroke at 9.6-year follow-up was 5.3% (95% CI, 4.2%-6.3%), 5.9% (95% CI, 4.8%-7.1%), and 7.7% (95% CI, 6.5%-9.1%) for good, moderate, and poor olfaction, respectively. Compared with good olfaction, poor olfaction was significantly associated with higher stroke risk throughout follow-up, albeit the association modestly attenuated after 6 years. Specifically, the adjusted risk ratios were 2.14 (95% CI, 1.22-3.94) at year 2, 1.98 (95% CI, 1.43-3.02) at year 4, 1.91 (95% CI, 1.43-2.77) at year 6, 1.49 (95% CI, 1.17-2.00) at year 8, and 1.45 (95% CI, 1.16-1.95) at year 9.6. Results were robust in multiple subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: In older adults, poor olfaction assessed by a single olfaction test was associated with the higher risk of stroke in the next 10 years.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嗅觉不良与老年人中风风险:社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究
背景:嗅觉不良可能与不良脑血管事件有关,但经验证据有限。我们旨在调查社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究中嗅觉与中风风险的关系:我们纳入了 2011 年至 2013 年基线无中风史的 5799 名老年人(75.5±5.1 岁,59.0% 为女性,22.2% 为黑人)。嗅觉通过 12 项嗅棒气味识别测试进行评估,并定义为差(正确率≤8)、中(9-10)或好(11-12)。从基线到首次中风、死亡、最后一次接触或 2020 年 12 月 31 日(以先发生者为准),对参与者进行随访。我们使用离散时间亚分布危险模型估算了不同嗅觉状态下中风的边际累积发病率和调整风险比,并考虑了协变量和死亡竞争风险:经过长达 9.6 年的随访,我们共发现 332 例中风事件。在长达 9.6 年的随访中,嗅觉良好、嗅觉中等和嗅觉差的中风调整后边际累积发病率分别为 5.3%(95% CI,4.2%-6.3%)、5.9%(95% CI,4.8%-7.1%)和 7.7%(95% CI,6.5%-9.1%)。与嗅觉良好相比,嗅觉不良在整个随访过程中与较高的中风风险显著相关,尽管这种相关性在 6 年后略有减弱。具体来说,第 2 年的调整风险比为 2.14(95% CI,1.22-3.94),第 4 年为 1.98(95% CI,1.43-3.02),第 6 年为 1.91(95% CI,1.43-2.77),第 8 年为 1.49(95% CI,1.17-2.00),第 9 年为 1.45(95% CI,1.16-1.95)。多个亚组和敏感性分析的结果都很可靠:结论:在老年人中,通过单一嗅觉测试评估的嗅觉差与未来 10 年中风风险较高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
期刊最新文献
Strategies to Advance Stroke Care in Women: An International Conversation. Sex Differences in Prescription Patterns and Medication Adherence to Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Among Patients With Ischemic Stroke. Preparing for (and Making the Most of) Your Next Scientific Conference. Immunothrombosis in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Sex Differences in the Pre- and In-Hospital Setting of Patients With Stroke Are Driven by Higher Age and Stroke Severity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1