Evaluating the Impact of an Educational Intervention on Nursing Labor Support Practices and Cesarean Birth Rates.

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1891/JDNP-2023-0033
Caitlin Jeanmougin
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of an Educational Intervention on Nursing Labor Support Practices and Cesarean Birth Rates.","authors":"Caitlin Jeanmougin","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-2023-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Over 30% of births in the United States occur via cesarean section despite increased risks to the birthing person and neonate. Evidence-based nursing practice related to fetal monitoring, patient positioning, and management of the second stage of labor can decrease the incidence of cesarean birth. <b>Objective:</b> The objective is to decrease the cesarean birth rate by 3% in a Midwestern suburban hospital. <b>Methods:</b> Baseline data on demographics, labor interventions, and birth outcomes were collected for 4 weeks (<i>n</i> = 85 births). The intervention included a sample of 24 labor nurses who took a pretest, viewed a narrated PowerPoint on methods to promote vaginal birth, and completed a posttest. Data were then collected for another four weeks (<i>n</i> = 90 births). <b>Results:</b> The mean improvement in posttest scores was 4.792 points, providing strong evidence that this education would result in a score increase between 3.9 and 5.6 with 95% confidence. There was no increase in the number of nursing interventions utilized during labor. The overall cesarean birth rate increased from 18.8% to 28.9%. <b>Conclusions:</b> The education was highly effective in increasing nurse knowledge, but this did not affect a change in nursing practice or cesarean birth rate. <b>Implications for Nursing:</b> High-quality education is not enough to change practice or outcomes. Additional research is needed on barriers that prevent the translation of knowledge into practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-2023-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over 30% of births in the United States occur via cesarean section despite increased risks to the birthing person and neonate. Evidence-based nursing practice related to fetal monitoring, patient positioning, and management of the second stage of labor can decrease the incidence of cesarean birth. Objective: The objective is to decrease the cesarean birth rate by 3% in a Midwestern suburban hospital. Methods: Baseline data on demographics, labor interventions, and birth outcomes were collected for 4 weeks (n = 85 births). The intervention included a sample of 24 labor nurses who took a pretest, viewed a narrated PowerPoint on methods to promote vaginal birth, and completed a posttest. Data were then collected for another four weeks (n = 90 births). Results: The mean improvement in posttest scores was 4.792 points, providing strong evidence that this education would result in a score increase between 3.9 and 5.6 with 95% confidence. There was no increase in the number of nursing interventions utilized during labor. The overall cesarean birth rate increased from 18.8% to 28.9%. Conclusions: The education was highly effective in increasing nurse knowledge, but this did not affect a change in nursing practice or cesarean birth rate. Implications for Nursing: High-quality education is not enough to change practice or outcomes. Additional research is needed on barriers that prevent the translation of knowledge into practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估教育干预对护理劳动支持实践和剖宫产率的影响。
背景:尽管对产妇和新生儿的风险增加,但在美国,超过30%的分娩是通过剖宫产进行的。循证护理实践涉及胎儿监测、患者体位和第二产程管理,可降低剖宫产的发生率。目的:目的是将中西部郊区医院的剖宫产率降低3%。方法:收集人口统计学、分娩干预和分娩结局的基线数据,为期4周(n = 85例分娩)。干预包括24名分娩护士的样本,他们进行了前测,观看了关于促进阴道分娩方法的解说ppt,并完成了后测。然后收集另外四周的数据(n = 90个新生儿)。结果:测试后分数的平均改善为4.792分,提供了强有力的证据,证明这种教育将导致分数在95%的置信度下提高3.9至5.6分。分娩过程中使用的护理干预措施数量没有增加。整体剖宫产率由18.8%上升至28.9%。结论:教育在提高护士知识方面是非常有效的,但这并不影响护理实践的改变或剖宫产率。对护理的启示:高质量的教育不足以改变实践或结果。需要进一步研究阻碍将知识转化为实践的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Facilitators and Barriers to Doctor of Nursing Practice Nurse Practitioner Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Study. Improving Patient Appointment Adherence With an Enhanced Appointment Reminder System. Implementation of a Theory-Driven and Evidence-Based Posthospital Discharge Tobacco Cessation Pilot Program. Unfinished Nursing Care in General Medical and Surgical Units: A Systematic Review. An Evidence-Based Quality Improvement Project of the Impact of a Nurse Practitioner-Led Heart Failure, Self-Care-Focused, Patient Education on Health Care-Related Quality of Life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1