The endometrioma paradox.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.5935/1518-0557.20240090
João Antonio Dias, Carlos Roberto Izzo, Georges Fassolas, Luiz Fernando de Oliveira Henrique, Gustavo Arantes Rosa Maciel, Sérgio Podgaec, Luciana Carvalho Delamuta
{"title":"The endometrioma paradox.","authors":"João Antonio Dias, Carlos Roberto Izzo, Georges Fassolas, Luiz Fernando de Oliveira Henrique, Gustavo Arantes Rosa Maciel, Sérgio Podgaec, Luciana Carvalho Delamuta","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20240090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endometriosis is a chronic disease that affects around 10% of reproductive age women worldwide and a common cause of infertility. One of its manifestations is ovarian endometriomas, which are present in 17-44% of endometriosis patients. Endometriomas can impair fertility by mechanical stretching and local inflammation, promoting oxidative stress in the surrounding ovarian cortex that could lead to apoptosis and necrosis of early follicles. The removal of endometriomas may improve spontaneous pregnancy rates, as already demonstrated by some studies. To reduce endometriomas recurrence, it is advised to perform cystectomy followed by hormonal suppression. However, this approach is unfeasible in patients desiring pregnancy. At the same time, cystectomy poses a threat to ovarian reserve and, therefore, to controlled ovarian stimulation. Women who have endometriomas surgically removed are at risk to have diminished response to ovarian stimulation if in vitro fertilization is needed in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic disease that affects around 10% of reproductive age women worldwide and a common cause of infertility. One of its manifestations is ovarian endometriomas, which are present in 17-44% of endometriosis patients. Endometriomas can impair fertility by mechanical stretching and local inflammation, promoting oxidative stress in the surrounding ovarian cortex that could lead to apoptosis and necrosis of early follicles. The removal of endometriomas may improve spontaneous pregnancy rates, as already demonstrated by some studies. To reduce endometriomas recurrence, it is advised to perform cystectomy followed by hormonal suppression. However, this approach is unfeasible in patients desiring pregnancy. At the same time, cystectomy poses a threat to ovarian reserve and, therefore, to controlled ovarian stimulation. Women who have endometriomas surgically removed are at risk to have diminished response to ovarian stimulation if in vitro fertilization is needed in the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
期刊最新文献
Analyzing free fatty acids in seminal plasma from asthenozoospermia patients undergoing antioxidant therapy. Elective fertility preservation before and after the Covid-19 pandemic outbreak. Live births after vaginal progesterone Cyclogest suppository versus Crinone gel for luteal phase support following cleavage and blastocyst cryopreserved embryo transfer (CET); a retrospective comparative study. The endometrioma paradox. Embryo Cryopreservation: What do couples think about it?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1