Unveiling pterion variability: a meta-analytic approach to enhance neurosurgical precision.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1007/s00276-025-03571-6
George Triantafyllou, Nektaria Karangeli, Fabrice Duparc, Maria Piagkou, Renato Galzio, George Tsakotos, George Botis, Theodosis Kalamatianos, Sabino Luzzi
{"title":"Unveiling pterion variability: a meta-analytic approach to enhance neurosurgical precision.","authors":"George Triantafyllou, Nektaria Karangeli, Fabrice Duparc, Maria Piagkou, Renato Galzio, George Tsakotos, George Botis, Theodosis Kalamatianos, Sabino Luzzi","doi":"10.1007/s00276-025-03571-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This meta-analytical systematic review aims at investigating the variability of the pterion, focusing on its morphological types and precise distances from various bony landmarks. Additionally, the neurosurgical significance of this critical cranial landmark is examined in depth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 and Evidence-based Anatomy Workgroup guidelines for anatomical studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Anatomical Quality Assurance Tool (AQUA). The meta-analysis was performed using R programming software and RStudio, employing the \"meta\" and \"metafor\" packages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 79 studies were included, encompassing 18,694 skull sides. The sphenoparietal type was identified as the most prevalent pterion variant, with a pooled prevalence of 78.54%. The epipteric type followed at 8.41%, while the frontotemporal (5.74%) and stellate (4.26%) types were the rarest. Significant differences in the prevalence of the epipteric, frontotemporal, and stellate types were observed across different nationalities. However, sex, side, and study type did not significantly influence pterion morphological variation. The study also extracted and calculated the distances between the pterion and key anatomical landmarks, including the midpoint of the zygomatic arch, the frontozygomatic suture, the mastoid process, and the external acoustic meatus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study offers critical anatomical insights by accurately mapping the pterion's location relative to essential cranial landmarks. These findings are vital for neurosurgical planning, particularly for procedures involving the anterior and middle cranial fossae. The detailed anatomical data provided can enhance the precision and safety of neurosurgical interventions, ultimately improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49461,"journal":{"name":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","volume":"47 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-025-03571-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This meta-analytical systematic review aims at investigating the variability of the pterion, focusing on its morphological types and precise distances from various bony landmarks. Additionally, the neurosurgical significance of this critical cranial landmark is examined in depth.

Methods: The systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 and Evidence-based Anatomy Workgroup guidelines for anatomical studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Anatomical Quality Assurance Tool (AQUA). The meta-analysis was performed using R programming software and RStudio, employing the "meta" and "metafor" packages.

Results: A total of 79 studies were included, encompassing 18,694 skull sides. The sphenoparietal type was identified as the most prevalent pterion variant, with a pooled prevalence of 78.54%. The epipteric type followed at 8.41%, while the frontotemporal (5.74%) and stellate (4.26%) types were the rarest. Significant differences in the prevalence of the epipteric, frontotemporal, and stellate types were observed across different nationalities. However, sex, side, and study type did not significantly influence pterion morphological variation. The study also extracted and calculated the distances between the pterion and key anatomical landmarks, including the midpoint of the zygomatic arch, the frontozygomatic suture, the mastoid process, and the external acoustic meatus.

Conclusion: This study offers critical anatomical insights by accurately mapping the pterion's location relative to essential cranial landmarks. These findings are vital for neurosurgical planning, particularly for procedures involving the anterior and middle cranial fossae. The detailed anatomical data provided can enhance the precision and safety of neurosurgical interventions, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示翼点变异性:一种提高神经外科精确度的元分析方法。
目的:本荟萃分析系统综述旨在研究翼点的变异性,重点关注翼点的形态类型和与各种骨标志的精确距离。此外,神经外科的意义,这一关键的颅标志进行了深入研究。方法:按照PRISMA 2020和循证解剖工作组解剖研究指南进行系统评价。使用解剖质量保证工具(AQUA)评估偏倚风险。meta分析使用R编程软件和RStudio进行,使用“meta”和“metafor”软件包。结果:共纳入79项研究,包括18,694个颅骨侧面。蝶顶型被确定为最常见的翼状变异,总患病率为78.54%。会阴型次之,占8.41%,额颞型(5.74%)和星状型(4.26%)最为少见。在不同的民族中,观察到会阴、额颞和星状型的患病率有显著差异。然而,性别、侧面和研究类型对翅片形态变化没有显著影响。该研究还提取并计算了翼点与关键解剖标志之间的距离,包括颧弓中点、颧额线、乳突和外耳道。结论:这项研究提供了关键的解剖见解,准确绘制翼点的位置相对于重要的颅标志。这些发现对于神经外科手术的规划是至关重要的,特别是对于涉及前颅窝和中颅窝的手术。所提供的详细解剖数据可以提高神经外科干预的准确性和安全性,最终改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Anatomy is a morphological science which cannot fail to interest the clinician. The practical application of anatomical research to clinical problems necessitates special adaptation and selectivity in choosing from numerous international works. Although there is a tendency to believe that meaningful advances in anatomy are unlikely, constant revision is necessary. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, the first international journal of Clinical anatomy has been created in this spirit. Its goal is to serve clinicians, regardless of speciality-physicians, surgeons, radiologists or other specialists-as an indispensable aid with which they can improve their knowledge of anatomy. Each issue includes: Original papers, review articles, articles on the anatomical bases of medical, surgical and radiological techniques, articles of normal radiologic anatomy, brief reviews of anatomical publications of clinical interest. Particular attention is given to high quality illustrations, which are indispensable for a better understanding of anatomical problems. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy is a journal written by anatomists for clinicians with a special interest in anatomy.
期刊最新文献
Sex estimation from sacral anatomy in Turkish adults: a machine learning-based analysis. Posterior interosseous ligament of the ankle: current evidence and knowledge gaps. The fovea capitis femoris as a dynamic surgical landmark: morphometric associations with the femoral inclination angle. Anatomical variations in the relationship between the sciatic nerve and the piriformis muscle: clinical implications. Isolated left common carotid artery: steal syndrome and neurological complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1