Intervention Stage Completion and Behavioral Health Outcomes: An Integrated Behavioral Health and Primary Care Randomized Pragmatic Trial.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1370/afm.230576
Kari A Stephens, Constance van Eeghen, Zihan Zheng, Tracy Anastas, Kris Pui Kwan Ma, Maria G Prado, Jessica Clifton, Gail Rose, Daniel Mullin, Kwun C G Chan, Rodger Kessler
{"title":"Intervention Stage Completion and Behavioral Health Outcomes: An Integrated Behavioral Health and Primary Care Randomized Pragmatic Trial.","authors":"Kari A Stephens, Constance van Eeghen, Zihan Zheng, Tracy Anastas, Kris Pui Kwan Ma, Maria G Prado, Jessica Clifton, Gail Rose, Daniel Mullin, Kwun C G Chan, Rodger Kessler","doi":"10.1370/afm.230576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We performed a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial of a comprehensive practice-level, multistage practice transformation intervention aiming to increase behavioral health integration in primary care practices and improve patient outcomes. We examined associations between completion of intervention stages and patient outcomes across a heterogeneous national sample of primary care practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two primary care practices across the United States with colocated behavioral health and 2,945 patients with multiple chronic medical and behavioral health conditions completed surveys at baseline, midpoint, and 2-year follow-up. We examined effects of intervention on patient health and primary care integration outcomes using multilevel mixed-effects models, controlling for baseline outcome measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences were found associated with the number of intervention stages completed and patient health outcomes including depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, pain interference, social participation, and physical function. However, the completion of each intervention stage was associated with increases in Practice Integration Profile domain scores and confirmed with modeling using multiple imputation for the following: workflow 3.5 (95% CI, 0.9 to 6.1), integration methods 4.6 (95% CI, 1.5 to 7.6), patient identification 2.9 (95% CI, 0.9 to 5.0), and total integration 2.7 (95% CI, 0.7 to 4.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A practice-centric flexible practice transformation intervention improved integration of behavioral health in primary care across heterogeneous primary care practices treating patients with multiple chronic conditions when accounting for completion of intervention stages. Interventions that allow practices to flexibly improve care have the potential to help complex patient populations. Future research is needed to determine how to best target patient health outcomes at the population level.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"35-43"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.230576","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We performed a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial of a comprehensive practice-level, multistage practice transformation intervention aiming to increase behavioral health integration in primary care practices and improve patient outcomes. We examined associations between completion of intervention stages and patient outcomes across a heterogeneous national sample of primary care practices.

Methods: Forty-two primary care practices across the United States with colocated behavioral health and 2,945 patients with multiple chronic medical and behavioral health conditions completed surveys at baseline, midpoint, and 2-year follow-up. We examined effects of intervention on patient health and primary care integration outcomes using multilevel mixed-effects models, controlling for baseline outcome measurements.

Results: No differences were found associated with the number of intervention stages completed and patient health outcomes including depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, pain interference, social participation, and physical function. However, the completion of each intervention stage was associated with increases in Practice Integration Profile domain scores and confirmed with modeling using multiple imputation for the following: workflow 3.5 (95% CI, 0.9 to 6.1), integration methods 4.6 (95% CI, 1.5 to 7.6), patient identification 2.9 (95% CI, 0.9 to 5.0), and total integration 2.7 (95% CI, 0.7 to 4.7).

Conclusion: A practice-centric flexible practice transformation intervention improved integration of behavioral health in primary care across heterogeneous primary care practices treating patients with multiple chronic conditions when accounting for completion of intervention stages. Interventions that allow practices to flexibly improve care have the potential to help complex patient populations. Future research is needed to determine how to best target patient health outcomes at the population level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干预阶段完成和行为健康结果:一项综合行为健康和初级保健随机实用试验。
目的:我们进行了一项实用的、集群随机对照试验,旨在提高初级保健实践中行为健康整合的综合实践水平、多阶段实践转化干预,并改善患者预后。我们在一个异质性的国家初级保健实践样本中研究了干预阶段的完成与患者结果之间的关系。方法:在美国42家行为健康的初级保健诊所和2945名患有多种慢性医疗和行为健康状况的患者完成了基线、中点和2年随访的调查。我们使用多水平混合效应模型检验了干预对患者健康和初级保健整合结果的影响,并控制了基线结果测量。结果:完成干预阶段的数量和患者的健康结果(包括抑郁、焦虑、疲劳、睡眠障碍、疼痛、疼痛干扰、社会参与和身体功能)之间没有发现差异。然而,每个干预阶段的完成与实践整合概况领域得分的增加相关,并通过使用以下多重输入的建模得到证实:工作流程3.5 (95% CI, 0.9至6.1),整合方法4.6 (95% CI, 1.5至7.6),患者识别2.9 (95% CI, 0.9至5.0),总整合2.7 (95% CI, 0.7至4.7)。结论:考虑到干预阶段的完成情况,以实践为中心的灵活实践转化干预改善了在治疗多种慢性疾病患者的异质性初级保健实践中初级保健行为健康的整合。允许实践灵活地改善护理的干预措施有可能帮助复杂的患者群体。未来的研究需要确定如何在人群水平上最好地针对患者的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
期刊最新文献
Social Risk-Informed Decision Support and Blood Pressure Control in a Primary Care Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Annals Journal Club: EHR-Integrated Social Clinical Decision Support in Community-Based Primary Care. AAFP: AAFP Residency Initiative Leads Impactful Changes for 2027 Match. A Team-Based Approach to Fair and Patient-Centered Dismissals in Family Medicine. Antithrombotic Therapy Discontinuation, Bleeding, and Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Cancer During the Last Phase of Life: Insights From Primary Care Records.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1