F-18 FDG PET/CT based Preoperative Machine Learning Prediction Models for Evaluating Regional Lymph Node Metastasis Status of Patients with Colon Cancer.

Su Jung Choi, Ji Sun Park, Hyung Joo Baik, Min Sung An, Ki Beom Bae, Sun Seong Lee
{"title":"F-18 FDG PET/CT based Preoperative Machine Learning Prediction Models for Evaluating Regional Lymph Node Metastasis Status of Patients with Colon Cancer.","authors":"Su Jung Choi, Ji Sun Park, Hyung Joo Baik, Min Sung An, Ki Beom Bae, Sun Seong Lee","doi":"10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.1.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop a simple machine-learning model incorporating lymph node metastasis status with F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) and clinical information for predicting regional lymph node metastasis in patients with colon cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 193 patients diagnosed with colon cancer between January 2014 and December 2017. All patients underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT and blood test before surgery. One categorical variable (lymph node FDG uptake [LNFDG]) and six continuous variables (age, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA], carbohydrate antigen 19-9 [CA19-9], C-reactive protein, and maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor) were used as input variables. Four supervised machine learning methods were used to build predictive models: logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and support vector machine (SVM). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the validation set were used for evaluating and comparing model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of patients with lymph node metastasis were 63 (33%). The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 28.8 ± 11.4. The mean CEA, CA19-9, and CRP levels were 4.8 ± 9.3 ng/ml, 15.6 ± 42.8 U/ml, and 1.0 ± 3.0 mg/dl, respectively. The mean NLR was 2.2 ± 1.2. The mean SUVmax levels of the primary tumor were 15.2 ± 7.9. Fifty-one (26%) patients showed FDG uptake in the pericolic lymph nodes.  The mean AUC of the LR, RF, GBM, and SVM methods for the LNFDG model was 0.7046, 0.7047, 0.7040, and 0.7058, respectively. The mean AUC of the LR, RF, GBM, and SVM methods for the LNFDG plus clinical information model was 0.7046, 0.7302, 0.7444, and 0.7097, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning methods using LNFDG and clinical information could predict the lymph node metastasis status in patients with colon cancer with higher accuracy than a model using only FDG uptake of the lymph nodes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55451,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":"26 1","pages":"85-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.1.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop a simple machine-learning model incorporating lymph node metastasis status with F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) and clinical information for predicting regional lymph node metastasis in patients with colon cancer.

Methods: This retrospective study included 193 patients diagnosed with colon cancer between January 2014 and December 2017. All patients underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT and blood test before surgery. One categorical variable (lymph node FDG uptake [LNFDG]) and six continuous variables (age, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA], carbohydrate antigen 19-9 [CA19-9], C-reactive protein, and maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor) were used as input variables. Four supervised machine learning methods were used to build predictive models: logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and support vector machine (SVM). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the validation set were used for evaluating and comparing model performance.

Results: The number of patients with lymph node metastasis were 63 (33%). The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 28.8 ± 11.4. The mean CEA, CA19-9, and CRP levels were 4.8 ± 9.3 ng/ml, 15.6 ± 42.8 U/ml, and 1.0 ± 3.0 mg/dl, respectively. The mean NLR was 2.2 ± 1.2. The mean SUVmax levels of the primary tumor were 15.2 ± 7.9. Fifty-one (26%) patients showed FDG uptake in the pericolic lymph nodes.  The mean AUC of the LR, RF, GBM, and SVM methods for the LNFDG model was 0.7046, 0.7047, 0.7040, and 0.7058, respectively. The mean AUC of the LR, RF, GBM, and SVM methods for the LNFDG plus clinical information model was 0.7046, 0.7302, 0.7444, and 0.7097, respectively.

Conclusion: Machine learning methods using LNFDG and clinical information could predict the lymph node metastasis status in patients with colon cancer with higher accuracy than a model using only FDG uptake of the lymph nodes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
779
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Cancer is a very complex disease. While many aspects of carcinoge-nesis and oncogenesis are known, cancer control and prevention at the community level is however still in its infancy. Much more work needs to be done and many more steps need to be taken before effective strategies are developed. The multidisciplinary approaches and efforts to understand and control cancer in an effective and efficient manner, require highly trained scientists in all branches of the cancer sciences, from cellular and molecular aspects to patient care and palliation. The Asia Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention (APOCP) and its official publication, the Asia Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (APJCP), have served the community of cancer scientists very well and intends to continue to serve in this capacity to the best of its abilities. One of the objectives of the APOCP is to provide all relevant and current scientific information on the whole spectrum of cancer sciences. They aim to do this by providing a forum for communication and propagation of original and innovative research findings that have relevance to understanding the etiology, progression, treatment, and survival of patients, through their journal. The APJCP with its distinguished, diverse, and Asia-wide team of editors, reviewers, and readers, ensure the highest standards of research communication within the cancer sciences community across Asia as well as globally. The APJCP publishes original research results under the following categories: -Epidemiology, detection and screening. -Cellular research and bio-markers. -Identification of bio-targets and agents with novel mechanisms of action. -Optimal clinical use of existing anti-cancer agents, including combination therapies. -Radiation and surgery. -Palliative care. -Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction. -Health economic evaluations.
期刊最新文献
Development of Mobile Application Based System for Improving Population Based Cancer Screening by Community Health Workers. Effect of Education on Nutritional Knowledge of Cancer Prevention based on Health Belief Model: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Effectiveness of a Dentist-based Anti-Smoking Intervention Among Malaysian Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Field Trial. Emerging Research and Future Directions on Doxorubicin: A Snapshot. Enhancing Medication Safety: Reducing Administration Errors in Oncology Setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1