Factors Influencing Pregnant Women's Participation in Randomised Clinical Trials in India: A Qualitative Study.

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.18074
Mridula Shankar, Umesh Charantimath, Ashwini Dandappanavar, Alya Hazfiarini, Yeshita V Pujar, Manjunath S Somannavar, Sara Rushwan, Joshua P Vogel, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Meghan A Bohren
{"title":"Factors Influencing Pregnant Women's Participation in Randomised Clinical Trials in India: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Mridula Shankar, Umesh Charantimath, Ashwini Dandappanavar, Alya Hazfiarini, Yeshita V Pujar, Manjunath S Somannavar, Sara Rushwan, Joshua P Vogel, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Meghan A Bohren","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore factors affecting participation of pregnant women in randomised clinical trials in Belagavi, Karnataka, India.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study using semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions as data collection methods.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Primary, secondary and tertiary health facilities and their community catchment areas in Belagavi district.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>Thirty-three in-depth interviews with health workers and previous participants of a pregnancy-focused trial, and 12 focus group discussions with currently pregnant women who had not previously participated in a clinical trial, family and community members, and accredited social health activists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Inductive thematic analysis with a team-based approach to interpretation in the study context.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pregnant women were often unable to distinguish between maternal health programmes and trial interventions. Among previous trial participants, expectations of higher quality care were a key motivation for trial participation. Household gendered power relations and trust in the health workforce influenced decisional dynamics regarding participation. Health workers vouched for trial safety, once they assessed the intervention as acceptable. Trial Implementation by the health workforce required understanding and navigating pregnancy-related beliefs and practices in communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anticipated health benefits, improved healthcare access, and trust in health workers are facilitators of trial participation. Engaging primary decision-makers is essential due to household gender dynamics. Trials must integrate strategies that clarify the distinct goals of research versus clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.18074","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore factors affecting participation of pregnant women in randomised clinical trials in Belagavi, Karnataka, India.

Design: A qualitative study using semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions as data collection methods.

Setting: Primary, secondary and tertiary health facilities and their community catchment areas in Belagavi district.

Sample: Thirty-three in-depth interviews with health workers and previous participants of a pregnancy-focused trial, and 12 focus group discussions with currently pregnant women who had not previously participated in a clinical trial, family and community members, and accredited social health activists.

Methods: Inductive thematic analysis with a team-based approach to interpretation in the study context.

Results: Pregnant women were often unable to distinguish between maternal health programmes and trial interventions. Among previous trial participants, expectations of higher quality care were a key motivation for trial participation. Household gendered power relations and trust in the health workforce influenced decisional dynamics regarding participation. Health workers vouched for trial safety, once they assessed the intervention as acceptable. Trial Implementation by the health workforce required understanding and navigating pregnancy-related beliefs and practices in communities.

Conclusion: Anticipated health benefits, improved healthcare access, and trust in health workers are facilitators of trial participation. Engaging primary decision-makers is essential due to household gender dynamics. Trials must integrate strategies that clarify the distinct goals of research versus clinical care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Fetal Fraction of Cell-Free DNA in the Prediction of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study. The Contribution of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy to Neonatal Unit Admissions and Iatrogenic Preterm Delivery at < 34+0 Weeks' Gestation in the UK: A Population-Based Study Using the National Neonatal Research Database. Unilateral Oophorectomy and Age at Natural Menopause: A Longitudinal Community-Based Cohort Study. Biopsychosocial Approaches for the Management of Female Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review. Outcome Reporting in Studies Investigating Treatment for Caesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1