The prevalence and related factors of social frailty in older adults: A low- and middle-income country perspective

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Australasian Journal on Ageing Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1111/ajag.13409
Esra Cataltepe, Eda Ceker, Ayse Fadiloglu, Fatih Gungor, Nermin Karakurt, Hacer Dogan Varan
{"title":"The prevalence and related factors of social frailty in older adults: A low- and middle-income country perspective","authors":"Esra Cataltepe,&nbsp;Eda Ceker,&nbsp;Ayse Fadiloglu,&nbsp;Fatih Gungor,&nbsp;Nermin Karakurt,&nbsp;Hacer Dogan Varan","doi":"10.1111/ajag.13409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>There are no studies examining the prevalence of social frailty and associated factors in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of social frailty and identify the contributing factors among older adults in Türkiye.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study included 570 participants aged 65 and older, all outpatients at a geriatric clinic. Data for demographics and co-morbidities were collected. Anthropometric measurements and comprehensive geriatric assessments were conducted. Social frailty was assessed using the 5-item Social Frailty Index (SFI), and physical frailty was evaluated with the Fried Frailty Phenotype. Sarcopenia was diagnosed based on low handgrip strength and reduced calf circumference.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants' mean age was 75.2 ± 6.3 years. Social frailty, depression, physical frailty and sarcopenia prevalence were 24%, 25%, 14% and 26%, respectively. Social frailty was reported to be statistically higher in women and those living alone, while significantly lower in married individuals. Depression, physical frailty and sarcopenia were more commonly observed in participants with social frailty (<i>p</i> &lt; .01). Furthermore, participants with heart failure and Parkinson's disease were more socially vulnerable than those with other co-morbid conditions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, physical frailty and depressive mood significantly increased social frailty, whereas being married decreased it even after adjusting for potential confounding factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Social frailty was more prevalent than physical frailty among Turkish older adults, reaching 24%. Advanced age, depression, physical frailty and being unmarried were strongly related factors to social frailty.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.13409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

There are no studies examining the prevalence of social frailty and associated factors in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of social frailty and identify the contributing factors among older adults in Türkiye.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 570 participants aged 65 and older, all outpatients at a geriatric clinic. Data for demographics and co-morbidities were collected. Anthropometric measurements and comprehensive geriatric assessments were conducted. Social frailty was assessed using the 5-item Social Frailty Index (SFI), and physical frailty was evaluated with the Fried Frailty Phenotype. Sarcopenia was diagnosed based on low handgrip strength and reduced calf circumference.

Results

Participants' mean age was 75.2 ± 6.3 years. Social frailty, depression, physical frailty and sarcopenia prevalence were 24%, 25%, 14% and 26%, respectively. Social frailty was reported to be statistically higher in women and those living alone, while significantly lower in married individuals. Depression, physical frailty and sarcopenia were more commonly observed in participants with social frailty (p < .01). Furthermore, participants with heart failure and Parkinson's disease were more socially vulnerable than those with other co-morbid conditions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, physical frailty and depressive mood significantly increased social frailty, whereas being married decreased it even after adjusting for potential confounding factors.

Conclusions

Social frailty was more prevalent than physical frailty among Turkish older adults, reaching 24%. Advanced age, depression, physical frailty and being unmarried were strongly related factors to social frailty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Pathways from spousal bereavement to cognitive functioning in Pakistani older adults: Mediational role of social rhythms and moderating role of social support The prevalence and correlates of depression and anxiety symptoms in older adults receiving in-home aged care: A cross-sectional survey Advancing gerontology through intergenerational equity, social quality and healthy longevity ‘I was there because I needed to be there’: A qualitative study of the experience of older adults hospitalised with COVID-19 in Australia Enhancing the quality of life of older people in rural Türkiye: A randomised controlled appraisal of solution-focused case management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1