Understanding the consumer, carer and stakeholder experiences of residential respite care

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Australasian Journal on Ageing Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1111/ajag.13404
Andrew Liem Hieu Huynh, Kathryn Lee, Christa Dang, Steven Savvas, Frances Batchelor, Paul Yates, Sanka Amadoru
{"title":"Understanding the consumer, carer and stakeholder experiences of residential respite care","authors":"Andrew Liem Hieu Huynh,&nbsp;Kathryn Lee,&nbsp;Christa Dang,&nbsp;Steven Savvas,&nbsp;Frances Batchelor,&nbsp;Paul Yates,&nbsp;Sanka Amadoru","doi":"10.1111/ajag.13404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Residential aged care respite clients are vulnerable and prone to poor health-care outcomes. Improvements in the quality of care for this cohort are urgently needed. However, before proposing changes in care models, a nuanced understanding of relevant issues affecting respite care consumers and professionals is required. We aimed to explore perspectives of consumers, carers, health-care workers and aged care workers involved in residential respite care (RRC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used purposive sampling to recruit respite consumers, their family members, residential aged care staff and health-care workers across metropolitan Melbourne for semi-structured telephone interviews and electronic surveys regarding RRC. Thematic analysis of interviews and surveys was performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-three semi-structured in-depth interviews (five family members, four residential aged care staff, five general practitioners, two nurse practitioners, seven hospital staff) and 12 electronic surveys (five family members, three general practitioners, four hospital staff) were completed. Five key themes were identified: (1) reasons for using respite care vary; (2) expectations and understanding of respite care vary; (3) structural and funding factors influence the experience and quality of care; (4) care professionals often lack timely access to accurate health-care information; and (5) medical management and health-care needs of respite residents are complex.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings from multiple stakeholders highlight several issues regarding the benefits of and problems with RRC, and the interfaces between the aged care and health-care sectors. Understanding these issues is pivotal in informing targeted and systemic interventions to improve RRC.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.13404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Residential aged care respite clients are vulnerable and prone to poor health-care outcomes. Improvements in the quality of care for this cohort are urgently needed. However, before proposing changes in care models, a nuanced understanding of relevant issues affecting respite care consumers and professionals is required. We aimed to explore perspectives of consumers, carers, health-care workers and aged care workers involved in residential respite care (RRC).

Methods

We used purposive sampling to recruit respite consumers, their family members, residential aged care staff and health-care workers across metropolitan Melbourne for semi-structured telephone interviews and electronic surveys regarding RRC. Thematic analysis of interviews and surveys was performed.

Results

Twenty-three semi-structured in-depth interviews (five family members, four residential aged care staff, five general practitioners, two nurse practitioners, seven hospital staff) and 12 electronic surveys (five family members, three general practitioners, four hospital staff) were completed. Five key themes were identified: (1) reasons for using respite care vary; (2) expectations and understanding of respite care vary; (3) structural and funding factors influence the experience and quality of care; (4) care professionals often lack timely access to accurate health-care information; and (5) medical management and health-care needs of respite residents are complex.

Conclusions

These findings from multiple stakeholders highlight several issues regarding the benefits of and problems with RRC, and the interfaces between the aged care and health-care sectors. Understanding these issues is pivotal in informing targeted and systemic interventions to improve RRC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Pathways from spousal bereavement to cognitive functioning in Pakistani older adults: Mediational role of social rhythms and moderating role of social support The prevalence and correlates of depression and anxiety symptoms in older adults receiving in-home aged care: A cross-sectional survey Advancing gerontology through intergenerational equity, social quality and healthy longevity ‘I was there because I needed to be there’: A qualitative study of the experience of older adults hospitalised with COVID-19 in Australia Enhancing the quality of life of older people in rural Türkiye: A randomised controlled appraisal of solution-focused case management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1