Evaluating C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin Discordance Among Febrile Infants at Risk of Serious Bacterial Infections

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Acta Paediatrica Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1111/apa.17602
Shu-Ling Chong, Stella Jinran Zhan, Zi Xean Khoo, Rupini Piragasam, Lena Wong, Seyed Ehsan Saffari, Jan Hau Lee, Sashikumar Ganapathy, Gene Yong-Kwang Ong
{"title":"Evaluating C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin Discordance Among Febrile Infants at Risk of Serious Bacterial Infections","authors":"Shu-Ling Chong,&nbsp;Stella Jinran Zhan,&nbsp;Zi Xean Khoo,&nbsp;Rupini Piragasam,&nbsp;Lena Wong,&nbsp;Seyed Ehsan Saffari,&nbsp;Jan Hau Lee,&nbsp;Sashikumar Ganapathy,&nbsp;Gene Yong-Kwang Ong","doi":"10.1111/apa.17602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to investigate the prevalence and factors associated with C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) discordance in febrile infants with serious bacterial infections (SBIs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a retrospective review of febrile infants ≤ 90 days old presenting to the emergency department between December 2018 and June 2023. We compared conservative and pragmatic thresholds for PCT (&lt; 0.5 ng/mL and &lt; 1.7 ng/mL) and CRP (&lt; 10 mg/L and &lt; 20 mg/L). Discordance was defined as normal CRP with abnormal PCT and vice versa. Performance was presented using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 3459 infants, 426 infants (12.3%) had SBIs, among whom 355 (83.3%) had both CRP and PCT performed. Overall, a conservative CRP threshold had the highest sensitivity (74.1%, 95% CI 69.2%–78.6%) and NPV (95.6%, 95% CI 94.6%–96.4%). Among those with SBIs, 148/355 (41.7%) had a normal PCT (&lt; 1.7 ng/mL) and an abnormal CRP (≥ 20 mg/L), while 16/355 (4.5%) had a normal CRP (&lt; 20 mg/L) and an abnormal PCT (≥ 1.7 ng/mL). An increased discordance, specifically abnormal CRP with normal PCT, was found in males, infants 29–90 days old, and those with urinary tract infections.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>SBI clinical decision rules should consider CRP-PCT discordance in specific patient populations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paediatrica","volume":"114 7","pages":"1576-1585"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apa.17602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

We aimed to investigate the prevalence and factors associated with C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) discordance in febrile infants with serious bacterial infections (SBIs).

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of febrile infants ≤ 90 days old presenting to the emergency department between December 2018 and June 2023. We compared conservative and pragmatic thresholds for PCT (< 0.5 ng/mL and < 1.7 ng/mL) and CRP (< 10 mg/L and < 20 mg/L). Discordance was defined as normal CRP with abnormal PCT and vice versa. Performance was presented using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results

Among 3459 infants, 426 infants (12.3%) had SBIs, among whom 355 (83.3%) had both CRP and PCT performed. Overall, a conservative CRP threshold had the highest sensitivity (74.1%, 95% CI 69.2%–78.6%) and NPV (95.6%, 95% CI 94.6%–96.4%). Among those with SBIs, 148/355 (41.7%) had a normal PCT (< 1.7 ng/mL) and an abnormal CRP (≥ 20 mg/L), while 16/355 (4.5%) had a normal CRP (< 20 mg/L) and an abnormal PCT (≥ 1.7 ng/mL). An increased discordance, specifically abnormal CRP with normal PCT, was found in males, infants 29–90 days old, and those with urinary tract infections.

Conclusion

SBI clinical decision rules should consider CRP-PCT discordance in specific patient populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估严重细菌感染风险的发热婴儿c反应蛋白和降钙素原不一致。
目的:探讨严重细菌感染(SBIs)发热婴儿c反应蛋白(CRP)和降钙素原(PCT)不一致的患病率及其相关因素。方法:我们对2018年12月至2023年6月期间就诊于急诊科的年龄≤90天的发热婴儿进行了回顾性分析。我们比较了PCT的保守阈值和实用阈值(结果:在3459名婴儿中,426名婴儿(12.3%)有sbi,其中355名(83.3%)同时进行了CRP和PCT。总体而言,保守CRP阈值具有最高的敏感性(74.1%,95% CI 69.2%-78.6%)和NPV (95.6%, 95% CI 94.6%-96.4%)。在SBI患者中,148/355(41.7%)患者的PCT正常(结论:SBI临床决策规则应考虑特定患者群体的CRP-PCT不一致)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Paediatrica
Acta Paediatrica 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
384
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paediatrica is a peer-reviewed monthly journal at the forefront of international pediatric research. It covers both clinical and experimental research in all areas of pediatrics including: neonatal medicine developmental medicine adolescent medicine child health and environment psychosomatic pediatrics child health in developing countries
期刊最新文献
Paediatric Primary Care Across Europe: A Survey of 42 Countries. The Safety and Efficacy of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Biosimilars in Retinopathy of Prematurity. Regulatory Problems in Infancy: Prevalence and Association With Early Neurodevelopmental and Medical Conditions in Toddlers. Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Psychological Aggression Toward Children in Bangladesh Based on Nationally Representative Data. Behavioural and Emotional Symptoms Did not Increase During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Swedish Preschool Children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1