Acceptability and Determinants of Opportunistic Screening for Breast Cancer in Indian Women.

Maheshkumar Bhausaheb Jagatap, Ajeet Pratap Maurya, Bharati Pandya, Swagata Brahmachari, Raghvendra Pratap Singh
{"title":"Acceptability and Determinants of Opportunistic Screening for Breast Cancer in Indian Women.","authors":"Maheshkumar Bhausaheb Jagatap, Ajeet Pratap Maurya, Bharati Pandya, Swagata Brahmachari, Raghvendra Pratap Singh","doi":"10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.1.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Screening for breast cancer has been effective in decreasing mortality. Mammography is not readily available in resource-limited countries like India. Annual clinical breast examination has been demonstrated to be as effective as biennial mammography in reducing mortality with much less cost. In absence of an organized systematic screening program opportunity of women visiting the hospital can be used to educate and screen. The current study was designed to assess the acceptability, determinants of acceptability and effectiveness of opportunistic breast cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care center in central India. Women of age >35 years with no breast complaints were offered to undergo screening for breast cancer by clinical breast examination. Women with non-breast related complaints or accompanying some other patients were included. Abnormal findings on clinical breast examination were followed by ultrasound (<40 years of age) or mammography (>40 years of age). Standard methods of examination were used. The sample size was 382 and the duration of the study was 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study out of 382 participants 255 (66.74%) accepted the examination and 127 denied. Only 66% of participants consented for screening and a lump was detected in seven (2.7%) women. All seven women with breast lump refused further diagnostic work-up. Acceptance of screening was not significantly affected by religion, educational status, marital status and occupation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was low acceptability to screening, awareness about breast cancer and treatment compliance rates to further management. Acceptability of screening is not affected by socioeconomic or educational status.</p>","PeriodicalId":55451,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":"26 1","pages":"43-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.1.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Screening for breast cancer has been effective in decreasing mortality. Mammography is not readily available in resource-limited countries like India. Annual clinical breast examination has been demonstrated to be as effective as biennial mammography in reducing mortality with much less cost. In absence of an organized systematic screening program opportunity of women visiting the hospital can be used to educate and screen. The current study was designed to assess the acceptability, determinants of acceptability and effectiveness of opportunistic breast cancer screening.

Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care center in central India. Women of age >35 years with no breast complaints were offered to undergo screening for breast cancer by clinical breast examination. Women with non-breast related complaints or accompanying some other patients were included. Abnormal findings on clinical breast examination were followed by ultrasound (<40 years of age) or mammography (>40 years of age). Standard methods of examination were used. The sample size was 382 and the duration of the study was 2 years.

Results: In the study out of 382 participants 255 (66.74%) accepted the examination and 127 denied. Only 66% of participants consented for screening and a lump was detected in seven (2.7%) women. All seven women with breast lump refused further diagnostic work-up. Acceptance of screening was not significantly affected by religion, educational status, marital status and occupation.

Conclusion: There was low acceptability to screening, awareness about breast cancer and treatment compliance rates to further management. Acceptability of screening is not affected by socioeconomic or educational status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度妇女乳腺癌机会性筛查的可接受性和决定因素。
背景:乳腺癌筛查在降低死亡率方面是有效的。在印度等资源有限的国家,乳房x光检查并不容易获得。在降低死亡率方面,每年一次的临床乳房检查已被证明与两年一次的乳房x光检查一样有效,而且成本要低得多。在缺乏有组织有系统的筛查方案的情况下,可以利用妇女到医院就诊的机会进行教育和筛查。本研究旨在评估机会性乳腺癌筛查的可接受性、可接受性的决定因素和有效性。方法:一项前瞻性横断面研究在印度中部的三级保健中心进行。年龄在50至35岁之间、无乳腺疾患的妇女接受临床乳腺检查进行乳腺癌筛查。有非乳房相关疾病或伴随其他患者的妇女也包括在内。对临床乳腺检查发现异常者进行超声检查(年龄40岁)。采用标准的检查方法。样本量为382例,研究时间为2年。结果:在382名参与者中,255人(66.74%)接受检查,127人拒绝接受检查。只有66%的参与者同意进行筛查,在7名(2.7%)女性中发现了肿块。所有患有乳房肿块的7名妇女都拒绝进一步的诊断检查。宗教、教育程度、婚姻状况和职业对筛查接受度无显著影响。结论:患者对乳腺癌筛查的接受程度、乳腺癌认知程度和治疗依从率较低。筛查的可接受性不受社会经济或教育状况的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
779
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Cancer is a very complex disease. While many aspects of carcinoge-nesis and oncogenesis are known, cancer control and prevention at the community level is however still in its infancy. Much more work needs to be done and many more steps need to be taken before effective strategies are developed. The multidisciplinary approaches and efforts to understand and control cancer in an effective and efficient manner, require highly trained scientists in all branches of the cancer sciences, from cellular and molecular aspects to patient care and palliation. The Asia Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention (APOCP) and its official publication, the Asia Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (APJCP), have served the community of cancer scientists very well and intends to continue to serve in this capacity to the best of its abilities. One of the objectives of the APOCP is to provide all relevant and current scientific information on the whole spectrum of cancer sciences. They aim to do this by providing a forum for communication and propagation of original and innovative research findings that have relevance to understanding the etiology, progression, treatment, and survival of patients, through their journal. The APJCP with its distinguished, diverse, and Asia-wide team of editors, reviewers, and readers, ensure the highest standards of research communication within the cancer sciences community across Asia as well as globally. The APJCP publishes original research results under the following categories: -Epidemiology, detection and screening. -Cellular research and bio-markers. -Identification of bio-targets and agents with novel mechanisms of action. -Optimal clinical use of existing anti-cancer agents, including combination therapies. -Radiation and surgery. -Palliative care. -Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction. -Health economic evaluations.
期刊最新文献
HPV Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening in Morocco: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Prognostic Impact of Supraclavicular Lymph Node Metastases in Lung Cancer: Do We Need a Modification of the Current Staging System? The Combined Effects of Eleutherine bulbosa Ethanol Extract and Tamoxifen On Cox-2 Levels in a BaLB/c Mouse Breast Cancer Model. The Interplay of CD8+ TILs and Microvascular Density: A Novel Prognostic Indicator in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma. The Non-Coding Code: Silent Regulators of MEG3 and Let-7i-3p/5p in the Progression of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1