A modified screening protocol for ARDS in patients with respiratory support based on SpO2 and FiO2: A single-center prospective, observational study

Yan Xia , Qiancheng Xu , Zhiyuan Guo , Huijuan Zhang , Yingya Cao , Yupeng Qi , Qun Chen , Weihua Lu
{"title":"A modified screening protocol for ARDS in patients with respiratory support based on SpO2 and FiO2: A single-center prospective, observational study","authors":"Yan Xia ,&nbsp;Qiancheng Xu ,&nbsp;Zhiyuan Guo ,&nbsp;Huijuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Yingya Cao ,&nbsp;Yupeng Qi ,&nbsp;Qun Chen ,&nbsp;Weihua Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.jointm.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The purpose is to formulate a modified screening protocol for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with respiratory support based on saturation of pulse oximetry (SpO<sub>2</sub>) and inspired oxygen concentration (FiO<sub>2</sub>).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective observational study was conducted from August to October 2020 at the Department of Critical Care Medicine of Yijishan Hospital Affiliated with Wannan Medical College. All patients admitted during the study period and required arterial blood gas analysis and electrocardiogram monitoring were included in this study. Patients with contraindications to arterial puncture, methemoglobinemia, carbon monoxide poisoning, and other factors that could affect data collection were excluded. The demographic and clinical data, immediate percutaneous SpO<sub>2</sub>, FiO<sub>2</sub>, arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO<sub>2</sub>), and respiratory rate were recorded; and the SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio (SFR) and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio (PFR) values were calculated according to the above information. The patients were divided into two cohorts by random number table: the establishment cohort and the verification cohort. In the established part, data were divided into group H and group N according to whether SpO<sub>2</sub> &gt;97 %. For group H (SpO<sub>2</sub> ≤97 %), the regression equation was established between SFR and PFR. For group N (SpO<sub>2</sub> &gt;97 %), the correlation between each observation data and PFR was analyzed. Then, a new diagnostic process was established, and the reliability was verified with the Berlin definition set as the gold standard for diagnosis and classification.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 341 patients were included. Among them, 161 patients were used to establish the model, and 180 patients were used to verify the validity of the model. In this new diagnosis progress, when SpO<sub>2</sub> ≤97 %, if SFR ≤352, ARDS may exist; when SpO<sub>2</sub> &gt;97 %, if FiO<sub>2min</sub> &gt;39 %, there may be ARDS. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy of the new diagnosis progress for ARDS were 91.1 %, 76.7 %, 89.6 %, 79.6 %, and 83.9 %, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio demonstrates notable sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing ARDS, presenting as a credible alternative to PFR.</div><div><strong>Trail Registration</strong> Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000029217</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of intensive medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 51-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of intensive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X24000756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The purpose is to formulate a modified screening protocol for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with respiratory support based on saturation of pulse oximetry (SpO2) and inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2).

Methods

This prospective observational study was conducted from August to October 2020 at the Department of Critical Care Medicine of Yijishan Hospital Affiliated with Wannan Medical College. All patients admitted during the study period and required arterial blood gas analysis and electrocardiogram monitoring were included in this study. Patients with contraindications to arterial puncture, methemoglobinemia, carbon monoxide poisoning, and other factors that could affect data collection were excluded. The demographic and clinical data, immediate percutaneous SpO2, FiO2, arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), and respiratory rate were recorded; and the SpO2/FiO2 ratio (SFR) and PaO2/FiO2 ratio (PFR) values were calculated according to the above information. The patients were divided into two cohorts by random number table: the establishment cohort and the verification cohort. In the established part, data were divided into group H and group N according to whether SpO2 >97 %. For group H (SpO2 ≤97 %), the regression equation was established between SFR and PFR. For group N (SpO2 >97 %), the correlation between each observation data and PFR was analyzed. Then, a new diagnostic process was established, and the reliability was verified with the Berlin definition set as the gold standard for diagnosis and classification.

Results

There were 341 patients were included. Among them, 161 patients were used to establish the model, and 180 patients were used to verify the validity of the model. In this new diagnosis progress, when SpO2 ≤97 %, if SFR ≤352, ARDS may exist; when SpO2 >97 %, if FiO2min >39 %, there may be ARDS. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy of the new diagnosis progress for ARDS were 91.1 %, 76.7 %, 89.6 %, 79.6 %, and 83.9 %, respectively.

Conclusion

The SpO2/FiO2 ratio demonstrates notable sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing ARDS, presenting as a credible alternative to PFR.
Trail Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000029217
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of intensive medicine
Journal of intensive medicine Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Outside Front Cover Metabolomic profiling and prognostication in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome Outcomes and risk factors of transported patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: An ECMO center experience Microcirculatory depth of focus measurement shows reduction of tissue edema by albumin resuscitation in burn patients Current advances in neurocritical care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1