A descriptive report on the impact of pharmacy workflows in the operational success of hospital at home implementation at a county academic hospital system.

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-01-04 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100560
Jason N Levy, Joshua Wollen, Phuoc Anne Nguyen, Catina Brimmer, Rohan Dwivedi, Shane Tolleson
{"title":"A descriptive report on the impact of pharmacy workflows in the operational success of hospital at home implementation at a county academic hospital system.","authors":"Jason N Levy, Joshua Wollen, Phuoc Anne Nguyen, Catina Brimmer, Rohan Dwivedi, Shane Tolleson","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The hospital at home (HaH) model has become more prevalent in the American healthcare system due to its ability to decrease acute care costs and readmission risk. Recent publications have provided guidance on optimizing medication management and patient safety by leveraging clinical pharmacy services. There is limited data on pharmacoeconomic impact of HaH implementation, specifically in underinsured patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the development of HaH-related pharmacy workflows and evaluate the operational success of the program in an underinsured patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This report describes HaH program implementation between August 1st, 2022, and March 19th, 2024. Patients were eligible for home treatment if they met geographic, clinical, financial, and social criteria.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The primary outcome measured was the quantity and cost of medication waste for patients treated at home. Secondary outcomes included HaH medication turnaround time, healthcare resource utilization, and patient safety. All study outcomes were reported using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 450 patients screened, 3 met criteria and provided consent for HaH enrollment. The total cost of medication waste for all 3 patients was $41.15, and 21 out of 53 dispensed doses (40 %) were wasted. The mean medication verification time was 8.1 min, and the mean medication preparation time was 50.2 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study data provides insight into enhancing dispensing practices while establishing the benefits pharmacists bring to the HaH care team. Future research should elaborate on other measures of operational success to identify optimal performance metrics to support expanding pharmaceutical services within the HaH care model.</p>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"17 ","pages":"100560"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The hospital at home (HaH) model has become more prevalent in the American healthcare system due to its ability to decrease acute care costs and readmission risk. Recent publications have provided guidance on optimizing medication management and patient safety by leveraging clinical pharmacy services. There is limited data on pharmacoeconomic impact of HaH implementation, specifically in underinsured patients.

Objectives: To describe the development of HaH-related pharmacy workflows and evaluate the operational success of the program in an underinsured patient population.

Methods: This report describes HaH program implementation between August 1st, 2022, and March 19th, 2024. Patients were eligible for home treatment if they met geographic, clinical, financial, and social criteria.

Outcomes: The primary outcome measured was the quantity and cost of medication waste for patients treated at home. Secondary outcomes included HaH medication turnaround time, healthcare resource utilization, and patient safety. All study outcomes were reported using descriptive statistics.

Results: Out of 450 patients screened, 3 met criteria and provided consent for HaH enrollment. The total cost of medication waste for all 3 patients was $41.15, and 21 out of 53 dispensed doses (40 %) were wasted. The mean medication verification time was 8.1 min, and the mean medication preparation time was 50.2 min.

Conclusion: Study data provides insight into enhancing dispensing practices while establishing the benefits pharmacists bring to the HaH care team. Future research should elaborate on other measures of operational success to identify optimal performance metrics to support expanding pharmaceutical services within the HaH care model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
A descriptive report on the impact of pharmacy workflows in the operational success of hospital at home implementation at a county academic hospital system. Effects of a community pharmacy cardiovascular practice transformation (CPT) program on blood pressure. Knowledge, perceptions, facilitators, and barriers towards asthma self-management among patients: A systematic review of the literature. Co-development of a community pharmacy training regarding fentanyl and xylazine test strips. A systematic review of the knowledge, attitude and practice of healthcare professionals and healthcare professional students towards household pharmaceutical waste disposal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1