Physical Activity and Incident Pancreatic Cancer: Results From the UK Biobank Prospective Cohort.

IF 1.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cureus Pub Date : 2025-01-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.78040
Borna A Assarian, Christopher D Byrne, Declan McDonnell, Zaed Hamady
{"title":"Physical Activity and Incident Pancreatic Cancer: Results From the UK Biobank Prospective Cohort.","authors":"Borna A Assarian, Christopher D Byrne, Declan McDonnell, Zaed Hamady","doi":"10.7759/cureus.78040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The relationship between physical activity and incident pancreatic cancer is poorly defined, and the evidence to date is inconsistent, largely due to small sample sizes and insufficient incident outcomes. Using the UK Biobank cohort dataset, the association between physical activity levels at recruitment and incident pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at follow-up was analysed. Method Physical activity, the key exposure, was quantified using Metabolic Equivalent Task (MET) values and categorised into walking, moderate, and vigorous activity. These categories were each analysed in quartiles. Summed activity was analysed both in quartiles and using International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) activity levels (low, moderate, high). Univariate hazard ratios (HRs) and multivariable-adjusted HRs (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox regression analyses. Results A total of 542 incident PDAC cases and 2,139 controls (1:4 matching for age and sex) with a median (IQR) follow-up of 6.8 (1.7) years were analysed. No significant association was found in walking, moderate, and vigorous activities. In summed activity, only the 3rd quartile showed a statistically significant inverse association with PDAC risk (aHR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.86, p<0.01). For IPAQ activity, the moderate and high activity groups showed borderline statistically significant associations with incident PDAC (aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.00, p=0.05, and aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-1.01, p=0.06, respectively). Conclusion The large UK Biobank cohort study did not show a strong association between physical activity levels and the development of incident PDAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 1","pages":"e78040"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.78040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The relationship between physical activity and incident pancreatic cancer is poorly defined, and the evidence to date is inconsistent, largely due to small sample sizes and insufficient incident outcomes. Using the UK Biobank cohort dataset, the association between physical activity levels at recruitment and incident pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at follow-up was analysed. Method Physical activity, the key exposure, was quantified using Metabolic Equivalent Task (MET) values and categorised into walking, moderate, and vigorous activity. These categories were each analysed in quartiles. Summed activity was analysed both in quartiles and using International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) activity levels (low, moderate, high). Univariate hazard ratios (HRs) and multivariable-adjusted HRs (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox regression analyses. Results A total of 542 incident PDAC cases and 2,139 controls (1:4 matching for age and sex) with a median (IQR) follow-up of 6.8 (1.7) years were analysed. No significant association was found in walking, moderate, and vigorous activities. In summed activity, only the 3rd quartile showed a statistically significant inverse association with PDAC risk (aHR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.86, p<0.01). For IPAQ activity, the moderate and high activity groups showed borderline statistically significant associations with incident PDAC (aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.00, p=0.05, and aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-1.01, p=0.06, respectively). Conclusion The large UK Biobank cohort study did not show a strong association between physical activity levels and the development of incident PDAC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育活动与胰腺癌发病率:来自英国生物银行前瞻性队列的结果
体育活动与胰腺癌发病率之间的关系尚不明确,迄今为止的证据也不一致,这主要是由于样本量小和发病率结果不充分。使用UK Biobank队列数据集,分析了招募时的身体活动水平与随访时胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)发生率之间的关系。方法使用代谢当量任务(MET)值对主要暴露量——体力活动进行量化,并将其分为步行、中度和剧烈活动。这些类别分别以四分位数进行分析。以四分位数和国际体育活动问卷(IPAQ)的活动水平(低、中、高)对总活动量进行分析。采用Cox回归分析计算单因素风险比(HRs)和多因素调整后的95%置信区间的风险比(aHRs)。结果共分析了542例PDAC病例和2139例对照(年龄和性别1:4匹配),中位(IQR)随访时间为6.8(1.7)年。在步行、中度和剧烈运动中没有发现显著的关联。在总活性中,只有第3个四分位数与PDAC风险呈统计学显著负相关(aHR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.86, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anesthetic Strategy for 30 Radiotherapy Sessions in a Child With Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Severe Behavioral Dysregulation: A Case Report. An In-Field Recurrent Cervical Cancer Case After Chemoradiotherapy With a Marked Response to Pembrolizumab Combined With TC (Paclitaxel-Carboplatin) Therapy: A Case Report. Delayed Recognition of Wernicke's Encephalopathy Following the Interruption of Thiamine in an Alcohol-Dependent Patient With Status Epilepticus: A Case Report. Scrub Typhus in Northern India: An Overview of Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Seasonal Patterns, and Public Health Implications. Longitudinal Response to Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy (EAT) in Chronic Nasopharyngitis With Outcome Redefinition and Stratified Analysis by Tissue Type and Baseline Severity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1