Borna A Assarian, Christopher D Byrne, Declan McDonnell, Zaed Hamady
{"title":"Physical Activity and Incident Pancreatic Cancer: Results From the UK Biobank Prospective Cohort.","authors":"Borna A Assarian, Christopher D Byrne, Declan McDonnell, Zaed Hamady","doi":"10.7759/cureus.78040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The relationship between physical activity and incident pancreatic cancer is poorly defined, and the evidence to date is inconsistent, largely due to small sample sizes and insufficient incident outcomes. Using the UK Biobank cohort dataset, the association between physical activity levels at recruitment and incident pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at follow-up was analysed. Method Physical activity, the key exposure, was quantified using Metabolic Equivalent Task (MET) values and categorised into walking, moderate, and vigorous activity. These categories were each analysed in quartiles. Summed activity was analysed both in quartiles and using International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) activity levels (low, moderate, high). Univariate hazard ratios (HRs) and multivariable-adjusted HRs (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox regression analyses. Results A total of 542 incident PDAC cases and 2,139 controls (1:4 matching for age and sex) with a median (IQR) follow-up of 6.8 (1.7) years were analysed. No significant association was found in walking, moderate, and vigorous activities. In summed activity, only the 3rd quartile showed a statistically significant inverse association with PDAC risk (aHR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.86, p<0.01). For IPAQ activity, the moderate and high activity groups showed borderline statistically significant associations with incident PDAC (aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.00, p=0.05, and aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-1.01, p=0.06, respectively). Conclusion The large UK Biobank cohort study did not show a strong association between physical activity levels and the development of incident PDAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 1","pages":"e78040"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.78040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background The relationship between physical activity and incident pancreatic cancer is poorly defined, and the evidence to date is inconsistent, largely due to small sample sizes and insufficient incident outcomes. Using the UK Biobank cohort dataset, the association between physical activity levels at recruitment and incident pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at follow-up was analysed. Method Physical activity, the key exposure, was quantified using Metabolic Equivalent Task (MET) values and categorised into walking, moderate, and vigorous activity. These categories were each analysed in quartiles. Summed activity was analysed both in quartiles and using International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) activity levels (low, moderate, high). Univariate hazard ratios (HRs) and multivariable-adjusted HRs (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox regression analyses. Results A total of 542 incident PDAC cases and 2,139 controls (1:4 matching for age and sex) with a median (IQR) follow-up of 6.8 (1.7) years were analysed. No significant association was found in walking, moderate, and vigorous activities. In summed activity, only the 3rd quartile showed a statistically significant inverse association with PDAC risk (aHR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.86, p<0.01). For IPAQ activity, the moderate and high activity groups showed borderline statistically significant associations with incident PDAC (aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.00, p=0.05, and aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-1.01, p=0.06, respectively). Conclusion The large UK Biobank cohort study did not show a strong association between physical activity levels and the development of incident PDAC.
体育活动与胰腺癌发病率之间的关系尚不明确,迄今为止的证据也不一致,这主要是由于样本量小和发病率结果不充分。使用UK Biobank队列数据集,分析了招募时的身体活动水平与随访时胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)发生率之间的关系。方法使用代谢当量任务(MET)值对主要暴露量——体力活动进行量化,并将其分为步行、中度和剧烈活动。这些类别分别以四分位数进行分析。以四分位数和国际体育活动问卷(IPAQ)的活动水平(低、中、高)对总活动量进行分析。采用Cox回归分析计算单因素风险比(HRs)和多因素调整后的95%置信区间的风险比(aHRs)。结果共分析了542例PDAC病例和2139例对照(年龄和性别1:4匹配),中位(IQR)随访时间为6.8(1.7)年。在步行、中度和剧烈运动中没有发现显著的关联。在总活性中,只有第3个四分位数与PDAC风险呈统计学显著负相关(aHR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.86, p